Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Stereotyped Zoonyms in Rusin Phraseology
View through CrossRef
The article regards stereotypes for presenting zoonyms in Rusin phraseology in the psycho-cognitive aspect of ethnic mentality. The zoonymic metaphors are considered to be double-natured: originally, the animal character epitomizes human features, and then, the human is seen through animalist characteristics. The ability to metaphorically nominate a human in the phraseological world concept is mostly revealed in the names of domestic animals. Stereotyped zoonyms in Rusin phraseology are based on the anthropomorphic analogy: zoonyms are used to analyze a person’s psycho-emotional and physiological states and characteristics. Zoonyms are quite frequent in paradoxes in which folk humor can be easily traced: there they creatively trigger the instances of irony as a basis for generating some witticisms. Zoomorphic metaphors are semantically dominated by lowered emotive estimating features being the most powerful expressive means to lower the addressee’s status. Negatively charged zoomorphic nomination is mainly connected with features of character, behavior, intellect, physique, social status, and psychology, which compare a person with a beast. Zoonyms are used to denote the relations of space, time, measure, and quantity. Stereotypically related phraseology units with zoonym components had been shaped in the Rusin culture through naïve beliefs, traditions and myths. As evaluating stereotypes, zoonyms are found in curses or biddings of grief, jokingly uttered. Presented in linguistically arranged texts, zoonymic stereotypes appear to reveal strong connections between language, culture and ethnic entity, as well as main features of Rusin mentality.
Title: Stereotyped Zoonyms in Rusin Phraseology
Description:
The article regards stereotypes for presenting zoonyms in Rusin phraseology in the psycho-cognitive aspect of ethnic mentality.
The zoonymic metaphors are considered to be double-natured: originally, the animal character epitomizes human features, and then, the human is seen through animalist characteristics.
The ability to metaphorically nominate a human in the phraseological world concept is mostly revealed in the names of domestic animals.
Stereotyped zoonyms in Rusin phraseology are based on the anthropomorphic analogy: zoonyms are used to analyze a person’s psycho-emotional and physiological states and characteristics.
Zoonyms are quite frequent in paradoxes in which folk humor can be easily traced: there they creatively trigger the instances of irony as a basis for generating some witticisms.
Zoomorphic metaphors are semantically dominated by lowered emotive estimating features being the most powerful expressive means to lower the addressee’s status.
Negatively charged zoomorphic nomination is mainly connected with features of character, behavior, intellect, physique, social status, and psychology, which compare a person with a beast.
Zoonyms are used to denote the relations of space, time, measure, and quantity.
Stereotypically related phraseology units with zoonym components had been shaped in the Rusin culture through naïve beliefs, traditions and myths.
As evaluating stereotypes, zoonyms are found in curses or biddings of grief, jokingly uttered.
Presented in linguistically arranged texts, zoonymic stereotypes appear to reveal strong connections between language, culture and ethnic entity, as well as main features of Rusin mentality.
Related Results
Übersetzungsorientierte Didaktisierung juristischer Phraseologie
Übersetzungsorientierte Didaktisierung juristischer Phraseologie
Abstract
Legal phraseology is an essential component of legal language, and thus of legal communication, in both quantitative and qualitative terms. It is also one o...
The Rusin question in Russian conservative journals (1890-1894)
The Rusin question in Russian conservative journals (1890-1894)
The article focuses on how Russian conservative journals in 1890-1894 discussed the Rusin question in Galicia, Bukovina, and Transcarpathia in connection with some noticeable polit...
Phytonymic Phraseology and Linguocultural Features of Paremiological Units
Phytonymic Phraseology and Linguocultural Features of Paremiological Units
The article comparatively examines phytonomic phraseology, forming a branch of onomastic phraseology of English and Azerbaijani languages. Internal classification of onomastic phra...
English Phraseology
English Phraseology
This book introduces students of English to one of the most fascinating and at the same time most difficult parts of language: Phraseology. Commonly known as phrases and idioms, ph...
Zoonyms denoting deer in the Altai linguistic culture
Zoonyms denoting deer in the Altai linguistic culture
The article is devoted to the linguistic and cultural specificity of zoonyms denoting reindeer family members (sygyn ‘deer, deer’ and bulan ‘elk’) in the Altai culture. A case stud...
FRAZEOLOGY IN DANSKOVĪTE’S PLAYS
FRAZEOLOGY IN DANSKOVĪTE’S PLAYS
Frequently used phrases in Danskovīte’ plays help to create a typical cultural landscape of Latgale, at the same time a wide range of stylistically expressive vocabulary, most ofte...
New taxonomic proposal for Chinese phraseology
New taxonomic proposal for Chinese phraseology
Over the years, the taxonomy of Chinese phraseology has been controversial. One of the main challenges for research in the field of phraseology is to discover how to classify all o...
Zoonyms represented in “Lahjatu-l-lug’ot”
Zoonyms represented in “Lahjatu-l-lug’ot”
Nowadays, the study, translation and analysis of the manuscripts existing in our scientific heritage is considered one of the most urgent is-sues. The work “Lahjatu-l-luguot” that ...

