Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Improving the Strategic Benchmarking of Intellectual Capital Management in Logistics Service Providers

View through CrossRef
This research developed a new integrated method for addressing the deficiencies and gaps generally found in past studies on benchmarking and for benchmarking intellectual capital (IC) in the underdeveloped domain of logistics. To resolve the lack of consideration of relationships among past benchmarking concepts and the impacts of their managerial factors, as well as to examine the wide range of elements and indicators of IC influencing the sustainable development of organizations, the proposed approach integrated the analytic network process and the concept of thinking and non-thinking assets with the generic benchmarking procedure. This new hybrid method was implemented in four commercial companies in courier service. The proposed method prioritized and identified the magnitudes of the factors focused upon, including the IC elements, and their performance measures by considering the fundamental characteristics of intangible assets. The obtained results highlight that management focuses on the IC of the best performer and other companies. This benchmarked outcome showed gaps and improvement as well as sustainable development opportunities for inferior logistics companies. The improved framework provides more systematic and specific benchmarking processes to consider, obtain, and compare the in-depth details of IC management. Moreover, ours is the first research on benchmarking that specifically focused on IC management in logistics service providers.
Title: Improving the Strategic Benchmarking of Intellectual Capital Management in Logistics Service Providers
Description:
This research developed a new integrated method for addressing the deficiencies and gaps generally found in past studies on benchmarking and for benchmarking intellectual capital (IC) in the underdeveloped domain of logistics.
To resolve the lack of consideration of relationships among past benchmarking concepts and the impacts of their managerial factors, as well as to examine the wide range of elements and indicators of IC influencing the sustainable development of organizations, the proposed approach integrated the analytic network process and the concept of thinking and non-thinking assets with the generic benchmarking procedure.
This new hybrid method was implemented in four commercial companies in courier service.
The proposed method prioritized and identified the magnitudes of the factors focused upon, including the IC elements, and their performance measures by considering the fundamental characteristics of intangible assets.
The obtained results highlight that management focuses on the IC of the best performer and other companies.
This benchmarked outcome showed gaps and improvement as well as sustainable development opportunities for inferior logistics companies.
The improved framework provides more systematic and specific benchmarking processes to consider, obtain, and compare the in-depth details of IC management.
Moreover, ours is the first research on benchmarking that specifically focused on IC management in logistics service providers.

Related Results

Logistics capability, logistics outsourcing and firm performance in an e‐commerce market
Logistics capability, logistics outsourcing and firm performance in an e‐commerce market
PurposeEffective and efficient supply chain management is critical to the success of firms engaging in e‐commerce. The purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of logistics c...
Diagnosis of delivery vulnerability in a logistics system for logistics risk management
Diagnosis of delivery vulnerability in a logistics system for logistics risk management
PurposeDelivery vulnerability is a critically important theme in logistics risk management. However, while logistics service providers often collect and retain massive amounts of l...
Equilibrium Study of Logistics Demand and Logistics Resource Allocation in Guangdong Province
Equilibrium Study of Logistics Demand and Logistics Resource Allocation in Guangdong Province
Abstract Logistics serve as a crucial link between production and consumption. The balanced allocation of logistics demand and resources can promote the balanced developmen...
INFLUENCE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES ON THE INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT
INFLUENCE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES ON THE INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT
The article determines that the innovative development of logistics management is a key condition for the successful reconstruction of the innovative management model in general. I...
A review on benchmarking of supply chain performance measures
A review on benchmarking of supply chain performance measures
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to redress the imbalances in the past literature of supply chain benchmarking and enhance data envelopment analysis (DEA) modeling approach in s...
An Investigation of Cross-Border E-Commerce Logistics and Develop Strategies Through SCCOM Framework and Logistic Service Risk Analysis
An Investigation of Cross-Border E-Commerce Logistics and Develop Strategies Through SCCOM Framework and Logistic Service Risk Analysis
Cross-border e-commerce has become popular recently, so the importance of cross-border logistics has been enhanced. Because foreign buyers have high demand for logistics time, stre...
ORGANIZATION OF LOGISTICS SERVICE AT MACHINE-BUILDING ENTERPRISES
ORGANIZATION OF LOGISTICS SERVICE AT MACHINE-BUILDING ENTERPRISES
The modern approaches to the interpretation of "logistics service", which is considered a set of functions and types of activities; a set of services; labor products; components of...
An optimisational model of benchmarking
An optimisational model of benchmarking
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to develop a quantitative methodology for benchmarking process which is simple, effective and efficient as a rejoinder to benchmarking detractor...

Back to Top