Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Freeport, the Environment, and the Amungme

View through CrossRef
The Amungme and Kamoro managed their environments for thousands of years in what is now Papua, Indonesia. In the late 1960s, seeking foreign capital to boost the nation’s economy, the president of Indonesia signed a contract with Freeport McMoRan Copper and Gold, which by 1988 began mining one of the world’s largest gold mines with almost no environmental regulations in place. Freeport’s close relationship to the Suharto regime resulted in the company’s ability to evade consequences for environmental and social damage. In the 1990s, NGOs began publicly criticizing the company’s substandard environmental and social record, pressuring the company through negative international attention. Freeport hurried to shield its reputation by investing in environmental management plans and addressing the social tensions with the indigenous population. Although many have addressed Freeport’s involvement in the abuses leveled on the environment and the indigenous populations in the mining concession, there is yet to be an analysis of this relationship through the lens of environmental justice history. While demonstrating how the political, material, and cultural levels of an environmental analysis aptly describe the relationship between Freeport, the environment, and the indigenous people, this thesis will argue that Freeport’s attempts at remediation were simply a veneer to ward off critics against the mining operations; all the while the company’s social and environmental records worsened over time. Freeport disrupted the lives of the indigenous people, who nevertheless showed complexity and agency in the face of great change.
Boise State University
Title: Freeport, the Environment, and the Amungme
Description:
The Amungme and Kamoro managed their environments for thousands of years in what is now Papua, Indonesia.
In the late 1960s, seeking foreign capital to boost the nation’s economy, the president of Indonesia signed a contract with Freeport McMoRan Copper and Gold, which by 1988 began mining one of the world’s largest gold mines with almost no environmental regulations in place.
Freeport’s close relationship to the Suharto regime resulted in the company’s ability to evade consequences for environmental and social damage.
In the 1990s, NGOs began publicly criticizing the company’s substandard environmental and social record, pressuring the company through negative international attention.
Freeport hurried to shield its reputation by investing in environmental management plans and addressing the social tensions with the indigenous population.
Although many have addressed Freeport’s involvement in the abuses leveled on the environment and the indigenous populations in the mining concession, there is yet to be an analysis of this relationship through the lens of environmental justice history.
While demonstrating how the political, material, and cultural levels of an environmental analysis aptly describe the relationship between Freeport, the environment, and the indigenous people, this thesis will argue that Freeport’s attempts at remediation were simply a veneer to ward off critics against the mining operations; all the while the company’s social and environmental records worsened over time.
Freeport disrupted the lives of the indigenous people, who nevertheless showed complexity and agency in the face of great change.

Related Results

Indigenous Development and Empowerment in Mimika Regency, Papua Province of Indonesia
Indigenous Development and Empowerment in Mimika Regency, Papua Province of Indonesia
The Amungme and Kamoro are indigenous groups that are among the most underprivileged and vulnerable groups in Mimika Regency, Indonesia. Modernization came to the area since the 19...
MENIMBANG POSISI INDONESIA DALAM KONTRAK KARYA FREEPORT (PROBLEMATIKA HUKUM-SOSIAL SERTA KEMUNGKINAN SOLUSINYA)
MENIMBANG POSISI INDONESIA DALAM KONTRAK KARYA FREEPORT (PROBLEMATIKA HUKUM-SOSIAL SERTA KEMUNGKINAN SOLUSINYA)
Permasalahan yang dikaji dalam penelitian ini meliputi: pertama, bagaimana posisi Indonesia dalam Kontrak Karya Freeport? Kedua, bagaimana problematika hukum dan sosial yang ditimb...
Project Management for Main Pass 299 Sulphur and Oil and Gas Facilities
Project Management for Main Pass 299 Sulphur and Oil and Gas Facilities
ABSTRACT Describes Project Management techniques used to organize and execute a major sulphur-oil and gas project located in the Gulf of Mexico. Project Managemen...
Membangun generasi melalui pendidikan: Peran YPMAK dalam Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Amungme & Kamoro
Membangun generasi melalui pendidikan: Peran YPMAK dalam Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Amungme & Kamoro
Education is a determinant of the success of a nation as evidenced by the increase in the Human Development Index. Yayasan pemberdayan masyarakat Amungme dan Kamoro (YPMAK) is a su...
Freeport rift is emblematic of Indonesian mining woes
Freeport rift is emblematic of Indonesian mining woes
Subject The dispute between PT Freeport Indonesia and the government. Significance Freeport-McMoRan, a US min...
Freeport as a Hub in the Art Market: Shanghai Art Freeport
Freeport as a Hub in the Art Market: Shanghai Art Freeport
With the soaring interest in art as an alternative investment approach and an asset class, there has been a remarkable rise in the volume of artwork transactions globally. However,...
Interview with Yves Bouvier
Interview with Yves Bouvier
Yves Charles Edgar Bouvier is a founder and/or shareholder of the following firms: Expositions Natural le Coultre SA (Geneva), Fine Art Transports Natural le Coultre SA (Geneva), L...
INDONESIA - FREEPORT ECONOMIC DISPUTE
INDONESIA - FREEPORT ECONOMIC DISPUTE
PT. Freeport Indonesia began operating in the Mimika district in Papua Province at the Gresberg mining. Their cooperation with Indonesia was marked with a contract of work I (Kontr...

Back to Top