Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

SU‐FF‐T‐114: Local Minima in Anatomic Aperture‐Based IMRT Optimization

View through CrossRef
Purpose: An anatomic aperture‐based IMRT optimization program, named Ballista, was recently developed at our institution. Even though studies previously published concluded local minima in full‐IMRT optimization were not problematic, early observations with Ballista revealed their nuisance in the case of simplified IMRT. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the extent of local minima and their impact on the optimization process.Method and Materials: In Ballista beam weights are optimized by a bound‐constrained quasi‐Newton algorithm, which cannot escape local minima, even with a quadratic dose‐based objective function. Therefore, a high number (20 000) of descents were launched with random initial weights to explore the solution space for a varying number of beams. Actual treatment plan DVHs corresponding to different local minima were analyzed, yielding information on the nature of those minima. Results: When only four beam weights were optimized, only a few but very distinctive local minima were found. For a more realistic case of 20 beam weights, the optimization revealed an astonishing number of local minima, almost forming a continuum in the objective function value space. DVH analysis showed local minima generally favor one or more organs‐at‐risk (OARs) while the other objectives, especially those concerning the target volume, are less than optimal compared with the global minimum. Also, all minima lie on the boundary of the solution space. It was found that limiting the initial beam weights to small values eliminates the vast majority of the solution space containing local minima. Conclusion: With Ballista local minima proved to be a major problem. Plans corresponding to different minima differed drastically. In order to give the optimization a “clear shot” at the global minimum, initial beam weights must be limited to small values. This focuses the optimization on improving the target volume objectives since all OARs objectives are initially met.
Title: SU‐FF‐T‐114: Local Minima in Anatomic Aperture‐Based IMRT Optimization
Description:
Purpose: An anatomic aperture‐based IMRT optimization program, named Ballista, was recently developed at our institution.
Even though studies previously published concluded local minima in full‐IMRT optimization were not problematic, early observations with Ballista revealed their nuisance in the case of simplified IMRT.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the extent of local minima and their impact on the optimization process.
Method and Materials: In Ballista beam weights are optimized by a bound‐constrained quasi‐Newton algorithm, which cannot escape local minima, even with a quadratic dose‐based objective function.
Therefore, a high number (20 000) of descents were launched with random initial weights to explore the solution space for a varying number of beams.
Actual treatment plan DVHs corresponding to different local minima were analyzed, yielding information on the nature of those minima.
Results: When only four beam weights were optimized, only a few but very distinctive local minima were found.
For a more realistic case of 20 beam weights, the optimization revealed an astonishing number of local minima, almost forming a continuum in the objective function value space.
DVH analysis showed local minima generally favor one or more organs‐at‐risk (OARs) while the other objectives, especially those concerning the target volume, are less than optimal compared with the global minimum.
Also, all minima lie on the boundary of the solution space.
It was found that limiting the initial beam weights to small values eliminates the vast majority of the solution space containing local minima.
Conclusion: With Ballista local minima proved to be a major problem.
Plans corresponding to different minima differed drastically.
In order to give the optimization a “clear shot” at the global minimum, initial beam weights must be limited to small values.
This focuses the optimization on improving the target volume objectives since all OARs objectives are initially met.

Related Results

Po‐Poster ‐ 19: Local minima in anatomic aperture‐based IMRT optimization
Po‐Poster ‐ 19: Local minima in anatomic aperture‐based IMRT optimization
Purpose: An anatomic aperture‐based IMRT optimization program, named Ballista, was developed at our institution. Even though studies previously published concluded local minima in ...
Dosimetric comparison of 3DCRT and IMRT in radical chemoradiotherapy of squamous cell carcinoma esophagus
Dosimetric comparison of 3DCRT and IMRT in radical chemoradiotherapy of squamous cell carcinoma esophagus
ABSTRACT Background: Radical chemoradiation is the standard of treatment for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of esophagus and for patien...
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Objective: To determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population idiopathic determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population...
Ten-Year Outcomes of IMRT With Chemotherapy Versus IMRT Alone for Stage Ⅱ-Ⅳa Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study
Ten-Year Outcomes of IMRT With Chemotherapy Versus IMRT Alone for Stage Ⅱ-Ⅳa Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study
Abstract Background Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, ...
Evaluation of Trends in Use of IMRT in Head and Neck Cancer
Evaluation of Trends in Use of IMRT in Head and Neck Cancer
ObjectiveEvaluate the trends of use of IMRT for head and neck cancer (HNC), with emphasis on Medicare reimbursement patterns and their effect on clinical use.MethodAll patients are...

Back to Top