Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

WHO RAISED MIKHAIL FEDOROVICH TO THE KINGDOM IN 1613?

View through CrossRef
Статья посвящена выяснению вопроса о том, представители каких социально-политических сил привели Михаила Федоровича Романова к власти. Проанализированы царские пожалования в первые недели царствования Михаила Федоровича, и сделан вывод, что ко времени Земского собора 1613 г. некогда сильная и влиятельная группировка Ф.Н. Романова была фактически разгромлена и обезглавлена. Кандидатуру его сына Михаила Романова — человека, не обладавшего качествами государственного деятеля, поддержали молодые представители группировок, оппозиционных как руководству объединенного ополчения, так и бывшей «семибоярщине». Умело организованная Авраамием Палицыным и его помощниками агитация помогла приверженцам Михаила Романова сначала получить поддержку казачьего круга, затем с помощью казаков добиться избрания своего кандидата на царство. Исключительно важную роль в избрании нового царя сыграло вольное казачье войско, образовавшееся в России за счет показаченья детей боярских, служилых людей по прибору и боевых холопов. Именно поэтому избрание Михаила Романова напоминало избрание вольными казаками «казачьих царевичей». Нового царя из династии Романовых возвел на престол народ. The article is devoted to clarifying the question of which representatives of socio-political forces brought Mikhail Romanov to power. The author analyzes the royal grants in the first weeks of Mikhail Fedorovich’s reign, and concludes that by the time of the Zemsky sobor in 1613, the once strong and influential group of F.N. Romanov was actually defeated and beheaded. The candidacy of Michail Romanov, a man who did not possess the qualities of a statesman, was supported by young representatives of groups opposed to both the leadership of the United Militia and the former Semiboyarschina. The agitation skillfully organized by A. Palitsyn and his assistants helped the adherents of Michail Romanov first to get the support of the Cossack circle, then with the help of Cossacks and Muscovites to achieve the election of their candidate for the kingdom. An extremely important role in the election of the new tsar was played by the free Cossack army, formed in Russia by showing the children of boyars, serving people on the device and combat slaves. That is why the election of Mikhail Romanov very much resembled the election of «Cossack princes» by free Cossacks. The new tsar from the Romanov dynasty was enthroned by the people.
Title: WHO RAISED MIKHAIL FEDOROVICH TO THE KINGDOM IN 1613?
Description:
Статья посвящена выяснению вопроса о том, представители каких социально-политических сил привели Михаила Федоровича Романова к власти.
Проанализированы царские пожалования в первые недели царствования Михаила Федоровича, и сделан вывод, что ко времени Земского собора 1613 г.
некогда сильная и влиятельная группировка Ф.
Н.
Романова была фактически разгромлена и обезглавлена.
Кандидатуру его сына Михаила Романова — человека, не обладавшего качествами государственного деятеля, поддержали молодые представители группировок, оппозиционных как руководству объединенного ополчения, так и бывшей «семибоярщине».
Умело организованная Авраамием Палицыным и его помощниками агитация помогла приверженцам Михаила Романова сначала получить поддержку казачьего круга, затем с помощью казаков добиться избрания своего кандидата на царство.
Исключительно важную роль в избрании нового царя сыграло вольное казачье войско, образовавшееся в России за счет показаченья детей боярских, служилых людей по прибору и боевых холопов.
Именно поэтому избрание Михаила Романова напоминало избрание вольными казаками «казачьих царевичей».
Нового царя из династии Романовых возвел на престол народ.
The article is devoted to clarifying the question of which representatives of socio-political forces brought Mikhail Romanov to power.
The author analyzes the royal grants in the first weeks of Mikhail Fedorovich’s reign, and concludes that by the time of the Zemsky sobor in 1613, the once strong and influential group of F.
N.
Romanov was actually defeated and beheaded.
The candidacy of Michail Romanov, a man who did not possess the qualities of a statesman, was supported by young representatives of groups opposed to both the leadership of the United Militia and the former Semiboyarschina.
The agitation skillfully organized by A.
Palitsyn and his assistants helped the adherents of Michail Romanov first to get the support of the Cossack circle, then with the help of Cossacks and Muscovites to achieve the election of their candidate for the kingdom.
An extremely important role in the election of the new tsar was played by the free Cossack army, formed in Russia by showing the children of boyars, serving people on the device and combat slaves.
That is why the election of Mikhail Romanov very much resembled the election of «Cossack princes» by free Cossacks.
The new tsar from the Romanov dynasty was enthroned by the people.

Related Results

Tsar Mikhail Romanov: His Entry into Power
Tsar Mikhail Romanov: His Entry into Power
Introduction. As historical literature shows, the election of Tsar Mikhail Romanov at the Zemsky Sobor of 1613 occurred without broad support of boyars and nobles. The Cossacks pla...
ON THE QUESTION OF THE ROLE OF THE COSSACKS IN THE ELECTION OF MIKHAIL FEDOROVICH ROMANOV TO THE KINGDOM
ON THE QUESTION OF THE ROLE OF THE COSSACKS IN THE ELECTION OF MIKHAIL FEDOROVICH ROMANOV TO THE KINGDOM
Анализируется ход Земского собора 1613 г. Выдвинуто предположение, что избрание Михаила Федоровича Романова не сулило аристократии заметных перспектив, но несло серьезные риски, чт...
The Stryapchie as a Rank of the Sovereign Court during the Reign Mikhail Romanov
The Stryapchie as a Rank of the Sovereign Court during the Reign Mikhail Romanov
The article is devoted to the study of the stryapchie as a rank of the Sovereign’s court during the reign of Mikhail Fedorovich. The author shows that during the reign of Mikhail F...
MPD physics performance studies in Bi+Bi collisions at √sNN = 9.2 GeV
MPD physics performance studies in Bi+Bi collisions at √sNN = 9.2 GeV
TheMulti-Purpose Detector (MPD) is one of the three experiments of the Nuclotron Ion Collider-fAcility (NICA) complex, which is currently under construction at the Joint Institute ...
Regina (Keyu) and Others v. Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Another
Regina (Keyu) and Others v. Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Another
Relationship of international law and municipal law — Treaties — Effect in municipal law — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 2 of Convention — Human Rights Act 19...
Tribute to the memory of Zarivchatsky Mikhail Fedorovich - surgeon, organizer of health care, professor of Perm State Medical University
Tribute to the memory of Zarivchatsky Mikhail Fedorovich - surgeon, organizer of health care, professor of Perm State Medical University
Zarivchatsky Mikhail Fedorovich - surgeon, Honored Doctor of the Russian Federation, Academician of the Academy of Natural Sciences, former Vice-Rector for academic work, head of t...
CHURCH POLICY OF PRINCE MIKHAIL ALEXANDROVICH OF TVER
CHURCH POLICY OF PRINCE MIKHAIL ALEXANDROVICH OF TVER
The article considers the Church policy of Prince Mikhail Alexandrovich of Tver. Tver Prince managed to defend the independence of his Principality in the fight against the strengt...
Mikhail Prishvin’s artistic outlook in Razumnik Ivanov-Razumnik’s interpretation
Mikhail Prishvin’s artistic outlook in Razumnik Ivanov-Razumnik’s interpretation
It is well known that the discovery of Mikhail Prishvin as an original writer belongs to Ivanov-Razumnik with whom they were friends during a long period of time. However, the crit...

Back to Top