Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Whewell, William
View through CrossRef
AbstractWilliam Whewell (1794–1866) developed and vigorously defended an impressive, deeply historically informed intuitionism (seeIntuitionism, Moral) at odds with the secular and theological forms of utilitarianism (seeUtilitarianism) gaining currency in his day. Although various influential critics complained that his view was no more than a simplistic intuitionism used to defend unreflective commonsense morality – by claiming that everyone just sees, clearly and distinctly, that promise‐keeping, truth‐telling, etc., are right – Whewell knowledgeably countered that charge. He held that the theory of morality, once philosophically developed and refined, yielded a system ofa priorimoral truths, and that these were apprehended intuitively but discovered and tested historically and empirically. This approach, for Whewell and his defenders, marked a productive middle path between pure rationalism, emphasizing the role of reason (rational insight or intuition) in grounding knowledge independently of sense experience, and pure empiricism, emphasizing the role of sense experience in grounding knowledge.
Title: Whewell, William
Description:
AbstractWilliam Whewell (1794–1866) developed and vigorously defended an impressive, deeply historically informed intuitionism (seeIntuitionism, Moral) at odds with the secular and theological forms of utilitarianism (seeUtilitarianism) gaining currency in his day.
Although various influential critics complained that his view was no more than a simplistic intuitionism used to defend unreflective commonsense morality – by claiming that everyone just sees, clearly and distinctly, that promise‐keeping, truth‐telling, etc.
, are right – Whewell knowledgeably countered that charge.
He held that the theory of morality, once philosophically developed and refined, yielded a system ofa priorimoral truths, and that these were apprehended intuitively but discovered and tested historically and empirically.
This approach, for Whewell and his defenders, marked a productive middle path between pure rationalism, emphasizing the role of reason (rational insight or intuition) in grounding knowledge independently of sense experience, and pure empiricism, emphasizing the role of sense experience in grounding knowledge.
Related Results
William Whewell ve John Stuart Mill’de Ahlâk-Hukuk İlişkisi
William Whewell ve John Stuart Mill’de Ahlâk-Hukuk İlişkisi
Bu makalede 19. yüzyıl Britanya’sının en önemli iki ahlâk düşünürü olan William Whewell (1794-1866) ve John Stuart Mill (1806-1873)’in ahlâk ile hukuk ilişkisine dair görüşleri kon...
The History and Geography of the Intellectual World: Whewell’s Politics of Language
The History and Geography of the Intellectual World: Whewell’s Politics of Language
Abstract
Victorian metaphors, like Victorian values, are back in style. A transformation in our reading of the natural sciences, especially Darwinism, is promised...
William Whewell, F. R. S. (1794-1866)
William Whewell, F. R. S. (1794-1866)
Abstract
I. Academic life. By R. Robson II. Contributions to science and learning. By Walter F. Cannon [Plates 19 TO 22] I. Academic life By R. Robson Fellow oj T...
William Whewell’S Odyssey: From Mathematics to Moral Philosophy
William Whewell’S Odyssey: From Mathematics to Moral Philosophy
Abstract
William Whewell was born on 24 May 1794, and died on 6 March 1866. What the ‘ruddy strapping divine’ crowded into his life brought forth from Sidney Smith, ...
William Whewell: Omniscientist
William Whewell: Omniscientist
Abstract
There was virtually no area in early nineteenth-century science in which William Whewell failed to make suggestions, comments, experiments, measurements,...
Antithetical Knowledge
Antithetical Knowledge
Abstract
As we have seen, Whewell’s Philosophy of 1840 was the culmination of a process of intense philosophical deliberation that spanned the best part of the tw...
William Whewell’s Philosophy of Knowledge and its Reception
William Whewell’s Philosophy of Knowledge and its Reception
Abstract
During Whewell’s lifetime references to his polymathic aspirations coloured most assessments of his achievements. Like Sydney Smith’s well-known aphorism...
The History of the Earth, Life, and Man: Whewell and Palaetiological Science
The History of the Earth, Life, and Man: Whewell and Palaetiological Science
Abstract
Any part of Whewell brings us to confront the whole. But Whewell as a whole is a daunting prospect. He was a very big man was Whewell, perhaps a great on...

