Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

A study on the standard setting, validity and reliability of the standardized patient performance rating scale – student version

View through CrossRef
Abstract Introduction: The quality of standardized patients’ performance plays a significant role in the effectiveness of clinical skills education. Therefore, providing standardized patients with constant feedback is pivotal, and as the students interact one-on-one with standardized patients, it is essential to learn the students' perspectives immediately after the encounters. There is not a single study where a standard scale with a cut-off score is specifically developed for students to assess the quality of standardized patients’ performance immediately after the encounters. The three main goals of this study include: 1) Developing a scale to measure standardized patients’ performance by students; 2) Examining its psychometric properties; and 3) Doing a standard-setting to determine a cut-off score for the scale. Materials and methods: In the scale developing process; for the pilot testing, and validation process, 702 medical students participated, whereas for the standard-setting process, seven educators took part in this study. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed. For the standard-setting study, the extended Angoff method was utilized. Results: As a result of the exploratory factor analysis, the scale had a single-factor structure as confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis. Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient was calculated as 0.91. The scale consisted of nine items. The score of a standardized patient at the borderline was 24.11 out of 45. Conclusions: "Standardized Patient Performance Rating Scale – Student Version" is a valid and reliable scale for assessing the performance of standardized patients by the students immediately. It will guide standardized patient trainers during their training and will enable standardized patients to assess and develop their weaknesses on an individual performance level.
Title: A study on the standard setting, validity and reliability of the standardized patient performance rating scale – student version
Description:
Abstract Introduction: The quality of standardized patients’ performance plays a significant role in the effectiveness of clinical skills education.
Therefore, providing standardized patients with constant feedback is pivotal, and as the students interact one-on-one with standardized patients, it is essential to learn the students' perspectives immediately after the encounters.
There is not a single study where a standard scale with a cut-off score is specifically developed for students to assess the quality of standardized patients’ performance immediately after the encounters.
The three main goals of this study include: 1) Developing a scale to measure standardized patients’ performance by students; 2) Examining its psychometric properties; and 3) Doing a standard-setting to determine a cut-off score for the scale.
Materials and methods: In the scale developing process; for the pilot testing, and validation process, 702 medical students participated, whereas for the standard-setting process, seven educators took part in this study.
Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were performed.
For the standard-setting study, the extended Angoff method was utilized.
Results: As a result of the exploratory factor analysis, the scale had a single-factor structure as confirmed by confirmatory factor analysis.
Cronbach's alpha internal consistency coefficient was calculated as 0.
91.
The scale consisted of nine items.
The score of a standardized patient at the borderline was 24.
11 out of 45.
Conclusions: "Standardized Patient Performance Rating Scale – Student Version" is a valid and reliable scale for assessing the performance of standardized patients by the students immediately.
It will guide standardized patient trainers during their training and will enable standardized patients to assess and develop their weaknesses on an individual performance level.

Related Results

Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Domination of Polynomial with Application
Domination of Polynomial with Application
In this paper, .We .initiate the study of domination. polynomial , consider G=(V,E) be a simple, finite, and directed graph without. isolated. vertex .We present a study of the Ira...
KEDUDUKAN AHLI BAHASA DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR: 47/PID.SUS/2019/PN. MGT)
KEDUDUKAN AHLI BAHASA DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR: 47/PID.SUS/2019/PN. MGT)
<em><span id="page3R_mcid52" class="markedContent"><span style="left: calc(var(--scale-factor)*125.30px); top: calc(var(--scale-factor)*539.11px); font-size: calc(va...
Validation of the Slade Fear of Childbirth Scale for Pregnancy in a Sample of Iranian Women: A Crosssectional Study
Validation of the Slade Fear of Childbirth Scale for Pregnancy in a Sample of Iranian Women: A Crosssectional Study
Objectives: The existence of a valid scale of fear of childbirth (FOC) has an effective role in identifying women at risk, so this study was conducted to determine the validation o...
Development of the Ego and Discomfort Anxiety Inventory: Initial Validity and Reliability
Development of the Ego and Discomfort Anxiety Inventory: Initial Validity and Reliability
This article reports on four studies regarding the development, reliability, and validity of scales to measure two forms of anxiety, ego anxiety and discomfort anxiety. In the firs...
Assessing energy rating premiums in the performance of green office buildings in Australia
Assessing energy rating premiums in the performance of green office buildings in Australia
Purpose– Green office buildings have recently taken on increased significance in institutional property portfolios in Australia and globally. The key issue from an institutional in...
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract Introduction Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Test Validity and Reliability in Learning Evaluation
Test Validity and Reliability in Learning Evaluation
The evaluation aimed to get achievement in assessing an educational target by students. In terms of assessment, a quality assessment tool is needed to fulfil two things: validity a...

Back to Top