Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Faster, Safer, Better Recovery: A Modified Robotic-Assisted Segmentectomy Versus Conventional Approaches in Early-Stage Lung Cance

View through CrossRef
Abstract Purpose The aim of this study is to evaluate the perioperative results of patients who receive robot-assisted thoracoscopic (RATS) modified segmentectomy and to compare the effectiveness and safety of this approach with those of traditional segmentectomy methods. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on perioperative data from 587 consecutive patients diagnosed with early-stage lung cancer who underwent robot-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy between January 2020 and September 2024. Using a 1:1 propensity score matching approach, 326 patients were paired based on clinical variables such as age, sex, body weight, height, pulmonary function test results, and tumor size as measured by CT. Comparative assessments of perioperative outcomes and oncological parameters were performed between the matched groups. Results Of the 587 individuals included in the study, 178 underwent conventional segmentectomy (CS), while 409 received modified segmentectomy (MS). After applying propensity score matching, a total of 328 patients were retained for the final comparative analysis. The MS group demonstrated a markedly shorter operative duration than the CS group (83.72 ± 25.46 minutes vs. 121.01 ± 35.74 minutes, P < 0.001). Although the MS group exhibited a higher mean estimated blood loss, this difference did not reach statistical significance (58.87 ± 77.57 ml vs. 44.27 ± 55.35 ml, P = 0.051). Additionally, tumor size was significantly smaller in the MS cohort (8.67 ± 2.82 mm vs. 10.41 ± 4.08 mm, P < 0.001). Complete (R0) resection was achieved in all cases. Conclusion The modified RATS segmentectomy offers significant benefits compared to conventional segmentectomy, such as shorter operative duration, improved postoperative recovery, and positive oncological results. These findings suggest that this approach may enhance both cancer control and patient recuperation, thereby supporting its wider implementation in clinical settings.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Title: Faster, Safer, Better Recovery: A Modified Robotic-Assisted Segmentectomy Versus Conventional Approaches in Early-Stage Lung Cance
Description:
Abstract Purpose The aim of this study is to evaluate the perioperative results of patients who receive robot-assisted thoracoscopic (RATS) modified segmentectomy and to compare the effectiveness and safety of this approach with those of traditional segmentectomy methods.
Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on perioperative data from 587 consecutive patients diagnosed with early-stage lung cancer who underwent robot-assisted thoracoscopic segmentectomy between January 2020 and September 2024.
Using a 1:1 propensity score matching approach, 326 patients were paired based on clinical variables such as age, sex, body weight, height, pulmonary function test results, and tumor size as measured by CT.
Comparative assessments of perioperative outcomes and oncological parameters were performed between the matched groups.
Results Of the 587 individuals included in the study, 178 underwent conventional segmentectomy (CS), while 409 received modified segmentectomy (MS).
After applying propensity score matching, a total of 328 patients were retained for the final comparative analysis.
The MS group demonstrated a markedly shorter operative duration than the CS group (83.
72 ± 25.
46 minutes vs.
121.
01 ± 35.
74 minutes, P < 0.
001).
Although the MS group exhibited a higher mean estimated blood loss, this difference did not reach statistical significance (58.
87 ± 77.
57 ml vs.
44.
27 ± 55.
35 ml, P = 0.
051).
Additionally, tumor size was significantly smaller in the MS cohort (8.
67 ± 2.
82 mm vs.
10.
41 ± 4.
08 mm, P < 0.
001).
Complete (R0) resection was achieved in all cases.
Conclusion The modified RATS segmentectomy offers significant benefits compared to conventional segmentectomy, such as shorter operative duration, improved postoperative recovery, and positive oncological results.
These findings suggest that this approach may enhance both cancer control and patient recuperation, thereby supporting its wider implementation in clinical settings.

Related Results

Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Current therapeutic strategies for erectile function recovery after radical prostatectomy – literature review and meta-analysis
Radical prostatectomy is the most commonly performed treatment option for localised prostate cancer. In the last decades the surgical technique has been improved and modified in or...
Lung Segmentectomy in NSCLC Surgery
Lung Segmentectomy in NSCLC Surgery
Current guidelines recommend surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The standard treatment for patients with cT1N0 NSCLC has been lobectomy with lymph-node dis...
Outcomes of segmentectomy versus lobectomy in adults with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis
Outcomes of segmentectomy versus lobectomy in adults with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis
Objective: Surgical resection remains the gold standard treatment for bronchiectasis in patients who present with hemoptysis or suppuration, as well as in those who do not respond ...
PROMs in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Comparison between Robotic Mako Assisted Versus Manual Technique
PROMs in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Comparison between Robotic Mako Assisted Versus Manual Technique
Study Purpose: The purpose of this observational study is to evaluate the degree of satisfaction and improvement in quality of life through PROMs (Patient Related Outcome Measures)...
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction: Although traumatic chylothorax is predominantly associated with penetrating injuries, instances following blunt trauma, as a rare and challenging condition, ...
Survival outcomes of Segmentectomy and Lobectomy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Survival outcomes of Segmentectomy and Lobectomy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Abstract Background The question of whether segmentectomy and lobectomy have similar survival outcomes for patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is ...
Minimally Invasive Thoracoscopic Surgery of Lung Adenocarcinoma in Old Age People
Minimally Invasive Thoracoscopic Surgery of Lung Adenocarcinoma in Old Age People
Background: Lung cancer is the most frequent human malignancy and the principal cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Adenocarcinoma is now the main histologic type, accounting ...

Back to Top