Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Survival outcomes of Segmentectomy and Lobectomy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
The question of whether segmentectomy and lobectomy have similar survival outcomes for patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a matter of debate.
Methods
A cohort study and randomized controlled trial were conducted, comparing segmentectomy and lobotomy, by utilizing computerized access to the Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases up until July 2022. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to evaluate the randomized controlled trials, while the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the cohort studies. Sensitivity analyses were also carried out.
Results
The analysis incorporated 18 literature studies, including one randomized controlled trial and 17 cohort studies, and was divided into a segmentectomy group (n = 2081) and a lobectomy group (n = 2395) based on the type of surgery the patient underwent. Each study was followed up from 27 months to 130.8 months after surgery. OS:HR = 1.14, 95%CI(0.97,1.32), P = 0.10; DFS:HR = 1.13, 95%CI(0.91,1.41), P = 0.27; RFS:HR = 0.95, 95%CI(0.81,1.12), P = 0.54.
Conclusion
The results of the study suggest that the survival outcomes of the segmentectomy group were not inferior to that of the lobectomy group. Segmentectomy should therefore be considered as a treatment option for early stage NSCLC.
Research Square Platform LLC
Title: Survival outcomes of Segmentectomy and Lobectomy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Description:
Abstract
Background
The question of whether segmentectomy and lobectomy have similar survival outcomes for patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a matter of debate.
Methods
A cohort study and randomized controlled trial were conducted, comparing segmentectomy and lobotomy, by utilizing computerized access to the Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases up until July 2022.
The Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to evaluate the randomized controlled trials, while the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the cohort studies.
Sensitivity analyses were also carried out.
Results
The analysis incorporated 18 literature studies, including one randomized controlled trial and 17 cohort studies, and was divided into a segmentectomy group (n = 2081) and a lobectomy group (n = 2395) based on the type of surgery the patient underwent.
Each study was followed up from 27 months to 130.
8 months after surgery.
OS:HR = 1.
14, 95%CI(0.
97,1.
32), P = 0.
10; DFS:HR = 1.
13, 95%CI(0.
91,1.
41), P = 0.
27; RFS:HR = 0.
95, 95%CI(0.
81,1.
12), P = 0.
54.
Conclusion
The results of the study suggest that the survival outcomes of the segmentectomy group were not inferior to that of the lobectomy group.
Segmentectomy should therefore be considered as a treatment option for early stage NSCLC.
Related Results
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: A collision tumor consists of two distinct neoplastic components located within the same organ, separated by stromal tissue, without histological intermixing...
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Safety and Efficacy of Atezolizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Abstract
Introduction
Although the efficacy of PD-L1 blockade has been evaluated in analyses that combine pharmacologically distinct antibodies, the specific efficacy and safety of...
Segmentectomies in patients with primary malignant lung tumors
Segmentectomies in patients with primary malignant lung tumors
Objective. To study the immediate and long-term outcomes of segmentectomy and lobectomy for malignant lung tumors. Material and methods. A retrospective study included patients wit...
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether it i...
Real-world outcomes of lobectomy, segmentectomy and wedge resection for the treatment of stage c-IA lung carcinoma
Real-world outcomes of lobectomy, segmentectomy and wedge resection for the treatment of stage c-IA lung carcinoma
Abstract
OBJECTIVES
To determine safety and survival outcomes associated with lobectomy, segmentectomy and wedge resection for e...
Lung segmentectomy: does it offer a real functional benefit over lobectomy?
Lung segmentectomy: does it offer a real functional benefit over lobectomy?
Anatomical segmentectomy has been developed to offer better pulmonary function preservation than lobectomy, in stage IA lung cancer. Despite the retrospective nature of most of the...
Efficacy of lobectomy versus segmentectomy for congenital lung malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Efficacy of lobectomy versus segmentectomy for congenital lung malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
Background
Congenital lung malformations (CLMs) are uncommon anomalies characterized by a broad clinical spectru...

