Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Survival outcomes of Segmentectomy and Lobectomy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Background
The question of whether segmentectomy and lobectomy have similar survival outcomes for patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a matter of debate.
Methods
A cohort study and randomized controlled trial were conducted, comparing segmentectomy and lobotomy, by utilizing computerized access to the Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases up until July 2022. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to evaluate the randomized controlled trials, while the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the cohort studies. Sensitivity analyses were also carried out.
Results
The analysis incorporated 18 literature studies, including one randomized controlled trial and 17 cohort studies, and was divided into a segmentectomy group (n = 2081) and a lobectomy group (n = 2395) based on the type of surgery the patient underwent. Each study was followed up from 27 months to 130.8 months after surgery. OS:HR = 1.14, 95%CI(0.97,1.32), P = 0.10; DFS:HR = 1.13, 95%CI(0.91,1.41), P = 0.27; RFS:HR = 0.95, 95%CI(0.81,1.12), P = 0.54.
Conclusion
The results of the study suggest that the survival outcomes of the segmentectomy group were not inferior to that of the lobectomy group. Segmentectomy should therefore be considered as a treatment option for early stage NSCLC.
Research Square Platform LLC
Title: Survival outcomes of Segmentectomy and Lobectomy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Description:
Abstract
Background
The question of whether segmentectomy and lobectomy have similar survival outcomes for patients with early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a matter of debate.
Methods
A cohort study and randomized controlled trial were conducted, comparing segmentectomy and lobotomy, by utilizing computerized access to the Pubmed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases up until July 2022.
The Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to evaluate the randomized controlled trials, while the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to evaluate the cohort studies.
Sensitivity analyses were also carried out.
Results
The analysis incorporated 18 literature studies, including one randomized controlled trial and 17 cohort studies, and was divided into a segmentectomy group (n = 2081) and a lobectomy group (n = 2395) based on the type of surgery the patient underwent.
Each study was followed up from 27 months to 130.
8 months after surgery.
OS:HR = 1.
14, 95%CI(0.
97,1.
32), P = 0.
10; DFS:HR = 1.
13, 95%CI(0.
91,1.
41), P = 0.
27; RFS:HR = 0.
95, 95%CI(0.
81,1.
12), P = 0.
54.
Conclusion
The results of the study suggest that the survival outcomes of the segmentectomy group were not inferior to that of the lobectomy group.
Segmentectomy should therefore be considered as a treatment option for early stage NSCLC.
Related Results
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Small Cell Lung Cancer and Tarlatamab: A Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
Abstract
Introduction
Tarlatamab is a Delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3) -directed bispecific T-cell engager recently approved for use in patients with advanced small cell lung cancer (SCL...
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Complex Collision Tumors: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: A collision tumor consists of two distinct neoplastic components located within the same organ, separated by stromal tissue, without histological intermixing...
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Microwave Ablation with or Without Chemotherapy in Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction
Microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged as a minimally invasive treatment for patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether it i...
Lung segmentectomy: does it offer a real functional benefit over lobectomy?
Lung segmentectomy: does it offer a real functional benefit over lobectomy?
Anatomical segmentectomy has been developed to offer better pulmonary function preservation than lobectomy, in stage IA lung cancer. Despite the retrospective nature of most of the...
Comparison of the Efficacy of SP-VATS Segmentectomy, SP-VATS Lobectomy, and 3P-VATS of Lobectomy in NSCLC Patients
Comparison of the Efficacy of SP-VATS Segmentectomy, SP-VATS Lobectomy, and 3P-VATS of Lobectomy in NSCLC Patients
Abstract
Objective: To analyze and study the clinical efficacy of single portal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (SP-VATS) segmentectomy, SP-VATS lobectomy, and convent...
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Evaluating the Science to Inform the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans Midcourse Report
Abstract
The Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans (Guidelines) advises older adults to be as active as possible. Yet, despite the well documented benefits of physical a...
Outcomes of segmentectomy versus lobectomy in adults with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis
Outcomes of segmentectomy versus lobectomy in adults with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis
Objective: Surgical resection remains the gold standard treatment for bronchiectasis in patients who present with hemoptysis or suppuration, as well as in those who do not respond ...
Hyalinizing Trabecular Tumor: A Case Series with Literature Review
Hyalinizing Trabecular Tumor: A Case Series with Literature Review
Abstract
Introduction: Hyalinizing trabecular tumor (HTT) is a rare thyroid neoplasm originating from follicular cells and poses diagnostic challenges due to its cytologic and hist...

