Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Foreign Policy Decision-Making
View through CrossRef
The study of foreign policy decision-making seeks to understand how states formulate and enact foreign policy. It views foreign policy as a series of decisions made by particular actors using specific decision-making processes. The origins of this focus on decision-making are generally traced to the 1950s and 1960s, with the literature increasing in complexity and diversity of approaches in more recent decades. Foreign policy decision-making is situated within foreign policy analysis (a subfield of international relations subfield), which applies theories and methods from an array of disciplines—political science, public administration, economics, psychology, sociology—to understand how states make foreign policy, and how these policies translate into geopolitical outcomes. The literature on foreign policy decision-making is often subdivided based on assumptions about the process by which actors make foreign policy decisions—primarily falling into rational and nonrational decision-making; about who is assumed to make the decision—states, individuals, groups, or organizations; and about the influences believed to be most important in affecting those decisions—international factors, domestic political factors, interpersonal dynamics, etc. While much of the literature focuses on foreign policy decision-making in the United States, there have been attempts to apply models developed in the US context to other states, as well as to generate generalizable theories about foreign policy decision-making that apply to certain types of states.
Title: Foreign Policy Decision-Making
Description:
The study of foreign policy decision-making seeks to understand how states formulate and enact foreign policy.
It views foreign policy as a series of decisions made by particular actors using specific decision-making processes.
The origins of this focus on decision-making are generally traced to the 1950s and 1960s, with the literature increasing in complexity and diversity of approaches in more recent decades.
Foreign policy decision-making is situated within foreign policy analysis (a subfield of international relations subfield), which applies theories and methods from an array of disciplines—political science, public administration, economics, psychology, sociology—to understand how states make foreign policy, and how these policies translate into geopolitical outcomes.
The literature on foreign policy decision-making is often subdivided based on assumptions about the process by which actors make foreign policy decisions—primarily falling into rational and nonrational decision-making; about who is assumed to make the decision—states, individuals, groups, or organizations; and about the influences believed to be most important in affecting those decisions—international factors, domestic political factors, interpersonal dynamics, etc.
While much of the literature focuses on foreign policy decision-making in the United States, there have been attempts to apply models developed in the US context to other states, as well as to generate generalizable theories about foreign policy decision-making that apply to certain types of states.
Related Results
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash
Abstract
This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
European Economic Integration
European Economic Integration
This book investigates the evolution of the integration process of the European Union (EU) under the lenses of economic development. The process of the European Economic Integratio...
Russian Foreign Policy
Russian Foreign Policy
Russian foreign policy has undergone substantial shifts in the post–Cold War period. Scholarly attention toward the topic has also experienced ebbs and flows as the breakup of the ...
Getting Evidence From Health Policy and Systems Research Into Policy and Practice for Controlling Endemic Tropical Diseases in Nigeria: Assessing Knowledge, Capacity, and Use
Getting Evidence From Health Policy and Systems Research Into Policy and Practice for Controlling Endemic Tropical Diseases in Nigeria: Assessing Knowledge, Capacity, and Use
BackgroundGetting evidence from Health Policy and Systems Research (HPSR) into policy and practice for effective control of neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) is essential for prov...
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
Do evidence summaries increase health policy‐makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review
This review summarizes the evidence from six randomized controlled trials that judged the effectiveness of systematic review summaries on policymakers' decision making, or the most...
Morality in Foreign Policy
Morality in Foreign Policy
The foreign policy analysis (FPA) subfield is situated at the intersection of international relations (IR) and foreign policy behaviors of states. It is characterized by the primac...
Caribbean Foreign Policy
Caribbean Foreign Policy
Despite the near-absence of studies of the Caribbean within the mainstream of international relations (IR) theory and foreign policy analysis (FPA), as well as a tendency to subsum...
How Scientific Research Impacts Policy Cycle
How Scientific Research Impacts Policy Cycle
Scientific research is increasingly referenced in policy documents issued by international, national,
and regional organizations, reflecting its role in governance and decision-mak...

