Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Russian Foreign Policy

View through CrossRef
Russian foreign policy has undergone substantial shifts in the post–Cold War period. Scholarly attention toward the topic has also experienced ebbs and flows as the breakup of the Soviet Union drastically decreased general interest toward a newly emerged Russia. The initial period of Russian foreign policy in the early 1990s was to a large degree a continuation of Soviet foreign policy, with its focus on cooperative relations with the West. This, in turn, combined with the general weakness of the Russian state, resulted in the relative disregard of other foreign policy directions. The deepening domestic power struggle led to a growing opposition toward the pro-Western course and paved the way for a number of domestic players to influence Russia’s foreign policy course. Vladimir Putin’s arrival to power in 2000 and the domestic changes he introduced freed foreign policy from most of its domestic constraints, at least temporarily. During his first presidential term (2000–2004), Russian foreign policy oscillated between competition with the West (the United States in particular) and attempts to integrate Russia as the West’s equal partner. The consolidation of the regime, which accelerated in Putin’s second presidential term (2004–2008), left its mark on foreign policy. Russia’s engagement with the external world underwent substantial changes, which turned out to be durable for the next decade and a half. Material resurgence, the strengthening of the state, and the domestic political consolidation fueled Russia’s assertiveness in international politics. These processes culminated in Putin’s 2007 Munich speech and the 2008 war with Georgia. The following period of the so-called tandemocracy (2008–2012), with Putin becoming prime minister and Dmitri Medvedev serving as president, led to a partial warming in relations with the West, though Russia continued its assertive policy. Russia also deepened its cooperation with a rising China. Putin’s return to power in 2012 initiated the conservative-nationalist turn in domestic politics, which was reflected in foreign policy. Russia increasingly positioned itself not only as a geopolitical challenger to the West, but also a normative one. The annexation of Crimea (2014), followed by the military intervention in Syria (2015), opened a new phase in Russian foreign policy. Moscow became bolder in using military force abroad and enlarged its presence in such regions as sub-Saharan Africa. The explanations of change and continuity in Russian foreign policy can be grouped in several camps, with scholars emphasizing power politics and external constraints, domestic politics, and the role of ideas and identity. The emerging trend is the growing popularity of pluralist explanations of Russian foreign policy.
Oxford University Press
Title: Russian Foreign Policy
Description:
Russian foreign policy has undergone substantial shifts in the post–Cold War period.
Scholarly attention toward the topic has also experienced ebbs and flows as the breakup of the Soviet Union drastically decreased general interest toward a newly emerged Russia.
The initial period of Russian foreign policy in the early 1990s was to a large degree a continuation of Soviet foreign policy, with its focus on cooperative relations with the West.
This, in turn, combined with the general weakness of the Russian state, resulted in the relative disregard of other foreign policy directions.
The deepening domestic power struggle led to a growing opposition toward the pro-Western course and paved the way for a number of domestic players to influence Russia’s foreign policy course.
Vladimir Putin’s arrival to power in 2000 and the domestic changes he introduced freed foreign policy from most of its domestic constraints, at least temporarily.
During his first presidential term (2000–2004), Russian foreign policy oscillated between competition with the West (the United States in particular) and attempts to integrate Russia as the West’s equal partner.
The consolidation of the regime, which accelerated in Putin’s second presidential term (2004–2008), left its mark on foreign policy.
Russia’s engagement with the external world underwent substantial changes, which turned out to be durable for the next decade and a half.
Material resurgence, the strengthening of the state, and the domestic political consolidation fueled Russia’s assertiveness in international politics.
These processes culminated in Putin’s 2007 Munich speech and the 2008 war with Georgia.
The following period of the so-called tandemocracy (2008–2012), with Putin becoming prime minister and Dmitri Medvedev serving as president, led to a partial warming in relations with the West, though Russia continued its assertive policy.
Russia also deepened its cooperation with a rising China.
Putin’s return to power in 2012 initiated the conservative-nationalist turn in domestic politics, which was reflected in foreign policy.
Russia increasingly positioned itself not only as a geopolitical challenger to the West, but also a normative one.
The annexation of Crimea (2014), followed by the military intervention in Syria (2015), opened a new phase in Russian foreign policy.
Moscow became bolder in using military force abroad and enlarged its presence in such regions as sub-Saharan Africa.
The explanations of change and continuity in Russian foreign policy can be grouped in several camps, with scholars emphasizing power politics and external constraints, domestic politics, and the role of ideas and identity.
The emerging trend is the growing popularity of pluralist explanations of Russian foreign policy.

Related Results

Kuban State University: Russian Philology on the 45th Parallel
Kuban State University: Russian Philology on the 45th Parallel
The article represents the history and modernity of philological scholarship in Kuban State University, the oldest university of classical education in the south of Russia, which h...
“Yearbook of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs” as a Source on the History of Russian Diplomacy
“Yearbook of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs” as a Source on the History of Russian Diplomacy
For political and informational purposes, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Empire intensified its publishing activities in the 1860s. One of the important projects wa...
Russian Theory of International Relations
Russian Theory of International Relations
Unique features of Russia’s perspectives on international politics as practice can be obtained quite clearly through the investigation of the debates on Russian foreign policy orie...
European Economic Integration
European Economic Integration
This book investigates the evolution of the integration process of the European Union (EU) under the lenses of economic development. The process of the European Economic Integratio...
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The UP Manila Health Policy Development Hub recognizes the invaluable contribution of the participants in theseries of roundtable discussions listed below: RTD: Beyond Hospit...
Spatial Development of the Russian Black Sea Region in New Conditions
Spatial Development of the Russian Black Sea Region in New Conditions
Introduction. The system of Russia’s long-term economic interests in the Black Sea basin, which are realised on the basis of mobilising the maritime potential of the Russian Black ...
Caribbean Foreign Policy
Caribbean Foreign Policy
Despite the near-absence of studies of the Caribbean within the mainstream of international relations (IR) theory and foreign policy analysis (FPA), as well as a tendency to subsum...

Back to Top