Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Bigger is not always better: size-dependent fitness effects of adult crowding in Drosophila melanogaster

View through CrossRef
Abstract Density-dependent selection is an important factor shaping the evolution of life histories. In holometabolous insects, crowding in the larval and adult stages can have very different effects on key fitness components. While the nuanced effects of density-dependent selection through larval crowding in Drosophila melanogaster have been extensively studied for various life history traits, very few studies have investigated the effects of adult crowding in Drosophila . Moreover, these few studies were mostly conducted on large flies, derived from low larval density cultures, and typically treated the overall density of flies per culture container as an index of the strength of adult crowding. We hypothesized that the size of the adults should shape the impact of adult crowding, with small individuals experiencing less stress than large individuals when crowded. Consequently, the adverse fitness effects usually associated with adult crowding may not be observed for small individuals. We tested this hypothesis by subjecting flies of different sizes – regular-sized flies, and small flies derived via larval crowding or selection for rapid development to adulthood – to an episode of adult crowding and examining their mortality and fecundity. Thus, we explored the interactive effects between larval and adult crowding on key fitness components. Small body size enabled flies to handle adult crowding better, with significantly lower mortality under crowded conditions when compared to flies of large body size. Moreover, small flies showed a consistent pattern of increased fecundity upon adult crowding. This positive impact on fecundity was not observed when larger flies were crowded. It is clear from our study that the effects of adult crowding can be very nuanced and body size-specific, even to the extent of having a net beneficial effect on fitness components, contrary to previous belief.
Title: Bigger is not always better: size-dependent fitness effects of adult crowding in Drosophila melanogaster
Description:
Abstract Density-dependent selection is an important factor shaping the evolution of life histories.
In holometabolous insects, crowding in the larval and adult stages can have very different effects on key fitness components.
While the nuanced effects of density-dependent selection through larval crowding in Drosophila melanogaster have been extensively studied for various life history traits, very few studies have investigated the effects of adult crowding in Drosophila .
Moreover, these few studies were mostly conducted on large flies, derived from low larval density cultures, and typically treated the overall density of flies per culture container as an index of the strength of adult crowding.
We hypothesized that the size of the adults should shape the impact of adult crowding, with small individuals experiencing less stress than large individuals when crowded.
Consequently, the adverse fitness effects usually associated with adult crowding may not be observed for small individuals.
We tested this hypothesis by subjecting flies of different sizes – regular-sized flies, and small flies derived via larval crowding or selection for rapid development to adulthood – to an episode of adult crowding and examining their mortality and fecundity.
Thus, we explored the interactive effects between larval and adult crowding on key fitness components.
Small body size enabled flies to handle adult crowding better, with significantly lower mortality under crowded conditions when compared to flies of large body size.
Moreover, small flies showed a consistent pattern of increased fecundity upon adult crowding.
This positive impact on fecundity was not observed when larger flies were crowded.
It is clear from our study that the effects of adult crowding can be very nuanced and body size-specific, even to the extent of having a net beneficial effect on fitness components, contrary to previous belief.

Related Results

On Flores Island, do "ape-men" still exist? https://www.sapiens.org/biology/flores-island-ape-men/
On Flores Island, do "ape-men" still exist? https://www.sapiens.org/biology/flores-island-ape-men/
<span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="background:#f9f9f4"><span style="line-height:normal"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><b><spa...
Hubungan Perilaku Pola Makan dengan Kejadian Anak Obesitas
Hubungan Perilaku Pola Makan dengan Kejadian Anak Obesitas
<p><em><span style="font-size: 11.0pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman',serif; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-langua...
Macromolecular crowding between the natural and unnatural
Macromolecular crowding between the natural and unnatural
Cells are densely packed with molecules of different sizes and chemistries that constantly move and interact with each other. This macromolecular crowding strongly influences how b...
Pengaruh Suhu Terhadap Siklus Hidup Lalat Buah (Drosophila melanogaster)
Pengaruh Suhu Terhadap Siklus Hidup Lalat Buah (Drosophila melanogaster)
Fruit flies (Drosophila melanogaster) generally have four phases in their life cycle, namely eggs, larvae, pupae and imago. In general, Drosophila melanogaster experiences a life c...
Meiotic, genomic and evolutionary properties of crossover distribution in Drosophila yakuba
Meiotic, genomic and evolutionary properties of crossover distribution in Drosophila yakuba
ABSTRACT The number of crossovers and their location across genomes are highly regulated during meiosis, yet the key components controlling them ...
Intra- and Interspecies Variation Among Bari-1 Elements of the Melanogaster Species Group
Intra- and Interspecies Variation Among Bari-1 Elements of the Melanogaster Species Group
Abstract We have investigated the distribution of sequences homologous to Bari-1, a Tc1-like transposable element first identified in Drosophila melanogaster, in 87 ...

Back to Top