Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

ARB/ACEI use and severe COVID-19: a nationwide case-control study

View through CrossRef
SummaryBackgroundAngiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) have anti-inflammatory effects. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) uses the membrane protein angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), which is increased by ARB/ACEI treatment, as a cell entry receptor. Therefore, the use of ARBs/ACEIs for COVID-19 remains controversial.MethodsA retrospective case-control study was conducted using COVID-19 patients previously diagnosed with hypertension before COVID-19 onset. The primary outcome was severe infection or all-cause mortality. Cases included ARB/ACEI use for ≥30 days during the 6 months before COVID-19 onset. Primary controls included antihypertensive use other than ARBs/ACEIs (narrow control); secondary controls included all other hypertension patients (broad control). We investigated ARB/ACEI association with outcomes in general and by subgroups (age, sex, and presence of diabetes) using logistic regression models with propensity score matching.FindingsOf 234427 suspected COVID-19 patients we screened, 1585 hypertension patients were analyzed. In the 892 cases, 428 narrow controls, and 693 broad controls, severe infection or death occurred in 8·6%, 22·2%, and 16·7%, respectively. ARB/ACEI use was associated with a reduced risk of severe infection or death relative to the narrow control group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0·43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0·28 – 0·65) and broad control group (aOR 0·49, 95% CI 0·33 – 0·71). The association was smaller for newly diagnosed hypertension patients (aOR 0·11, 95% CI 0·03 – 0·42 compared to narrow control group). ARB/ACEI protective effects against severe infection or death were significantly observed in male and diabetic patients.InterpretationARB/ACEI use was associated with a lower risk of severe infection or mortality compared to other antihypertensives or ARB/ACEI nonuse.FundingNoneResearch in contextEvidence before this studyAnimal studies reported that ACE2 attenuates lung injury and provides a protective effect against severe pneumonia. Additionally, retrospective studies found that ARBs/ACEIs may have beneficial effects on ARDS patient survival. Previous observational studies have reported no potential harmful association of either ARBs or ACEIs with COVID-19 outcomes.Added value of this studyBy analyzing nationwide claims data in South Korea, we found that previous use of ARB/ACEI was associated with improved outcomes in COVID-19 compared with either nonuse or use of a different class of antihypertensive drugs. The risk of severe infection or death was consistently about 55% lower in those treated with ARB/ACEIs than those who were not exposed to ARB/ACEIs. The protective effect of ARB/ACEI was remained significantly among the male subgroup and patients with diabetes. This association was also observed among COVID-19 patients with newly diagnosed hypertension.Implications of all the available evidenceThese results provide supporting evidence for the continued use of ARBs/ACEIs among patients with COVID-19. Moreover, for newly diagnosed hypertension patients, initiation of ARB/ACEI use may not adversely affect COVID-19 prognosis. Given the poor prognosis of COVID-19 patients with hypertension and lack of curable strategy, these findings may have considerable clinical implications in prevention of poor outcome in patients with hypertension.
Title: ARB/ACEI use and severe COVID-19: a nationwide case-control study
Description:
SummaryBackgroundAngiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) have anti-inflammatory effects.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) uses the membrane protein angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), which is increased by ARB/ACEI treatment, as a cell entry receptor.
Therefore, the use of ARBs/ACEIs for COVID-19 remains controversial.
MethodsA retrospective case-control study was conducted using COVID-19 patients previously diagnosed with hypertension before COVID-19 onset.
The primary outcome was severe infection or all-cause mortality.
Cases included ARB/ACEI use for ≥30 days during the 6 months before COVID-19 onset.
Primary controls included antihypertensive use other than ARBs/ACEIs (narrow control); secondary controls included all other hypertension patients (broad control).
We investigated ARB/ACEI association with outcomes in general and by subgroups (age, sex, and presence of diabetes) using logistic regression models with propensity score matching.
FindingsOf 234427 suspected COVID-19 patients we screened, 1585 hypertension patients were analyzed.
In the 892 cases, 428 narrow controls, and 693 broad controls, severe infection or death occurred in 8·6%, 22·2%, and 16·7%, respectively.
ARB/ACEI use was associated with a reduced risk of severe infection or death relative to the narrow control group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0·43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0·28 – 0·65) and broad control group (aOR 0·49, 95% CI 0·33 – 0·71).
The association was smaller for newly diagnosed hypertension patients (aOR 0·11, 95% CI 0·03 – 0·42 compared to narrow control group).
ARB/ACEI protective effects against severe infection or death were significantly observed in male and diabetic patients.
InterpretationARB/ACEI use was associated with a lower risk of severe infection or mortality compared to other antihypertensives or ARB/ACEI nonuse.
FundingNoneResearch in contextEvidence before this studyAnimal studies reported that ACE2 attenuates lung injury and provides a protective effect against severe pneumonia.
Additionally, retrospective studies found that ARBs/ACEIs may have beneficial effects on ARDS patient survival.
Previous observational studies have reported no potential harmful association of either ARBs or ACEIs with COVID-19 outcomes.
Added value of this studyBy analyzing nationwide claims data in South Korea, we found that previous use of ARB/ACEI was associated with improved outcomes in COVID-19 compared with either nonuse or use of a different class of antihypertensive drugs.
The risk of severe infection or death was consistently about 55% lower in those treated with ARB/ACEIs than those who were not exposed to ARB/ACEIs.
The protective effect of ARB/ACEI was remained significantly among the male subgroup and patients with diabetes.
This association was also observed among COVID-19 patients with newly diagnosed hypertension.
Implications of all the available evidenceThese results provide supporting evidence for the continued use of ARBs/ACEIs among patients with COVID-19.
Moreover, for newly diagnosed hypertension patients, initiation of ARB/ACEI use may not adversely affect COVID-19 prognosis.
Given the poor prognosis of COVID-19 patients with hypertension and lack of curable strategy, these findings may have considerable clinical implications in prevention of poor outcome in patients with hypertension.

Related Results

Effect of ACEI and ARB treatment on nitric oxide-dependent endothelial function
Effect of ACEI and ARB treatment on nitric oxide-dependent endothelial function
Summary: Background: Angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARB) are widely used as a first-line therapy for the treatment of cardiov...
Angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors stimulate cerebral arteriogenesis
Angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors stimulate cerebral arteriogenesis
AbstractAimArteriogenesis constitutes the most efficient endogenous rescue mechanism in cases of cerebral ischaemia. The aim of this work was to investigate whether angiotensin‐con...
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct Introduction Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
ANTIHYPERTENSIVE THERAPY AND DYSLIPIDEMIA. SIAMESE TREATMENT!
ANTIHYPERTENSIVE THERAPY AND DYSLIPIDEMIA. SIAMESE TREATMENT!
Objective: Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in industrialized countries. This was a retrospective observational study, evaluatin...
Acute kidney injury induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor in a kidney transplant recipient: a case report
Acute kidney injury induced by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor in a kidney transplant recipient: a case report
Abstract Background: We described our medical records in details combined with some published literature, to discuss the suitable population and timing of Angiotensin-Conve...
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Breast Carcinoma within Fibroadenoma: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Fibroadenoma is the most common benign breast lesion; however, it carries a potential risk of malignant transformation. This systematic review provides an ove...
PRESCRIPTION PATTERN OF ANTI-HYPERTENSIVE MEDICATIONS IN PATIENTS WITH HYPERTENSION AT A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL, ASSAM
PRESCRIPTION PATTERN OF ANTI-HYPERTENSIVE MEDICATIONS IN PATIENTS WITH HYPERTENSION AT A TERTIARY CARE HOSPITAL, ASSAM
Objective: The aim of our study is to analyze the pattern of prescription of medications used for managing hypertension (HTN) at a tertiary care hospital and assess the comorbiditi...

Back to Top