Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Abstract 14077: One-year Outcome After PCI in Patients Treated Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers - Subanalysis From Multicenter Registry -
View through CrossRef
Background:
The prescription of inhibitors for renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is associated with improved prognosis but have respectively different mechanisms of action in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) therapy in patients with CAD undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Methods:
This study is a subanalysis from the TWINCRE registry that is a multicentral prospective cohort including patients who underwent PCI. After excluding 18 patients who received both ACEi and ARB from 2,896 registered patients, we ultimately evaluated 369 patients treated with ACEi, 492 with ARB and 541 without ACEi or ARB. The primary endpoint was a major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) including death from any cause, acute coronary syndrome, stent thrombosis, stroke and hospitalization for heart failure. The impact of RAAS inhibitors on all-cause mortality alone was also evaluated.
Results:
During the observation period with 366 days of a median follow-up, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the ARB group had the lowest rate of MACCE than other two groups (Log-rank for trend, p< for < 0.0001, Figure). Regarding all-cause mortality, the ARB group and ACEi group had comparable rates for MACCE, which were lower than the no-ACEi/ARB group (p< for < 0.0001). In a Cox regression analysis, after adjusting with age, gender, comorbidities, multivessel disease, acute myocardial infarction, and medications at discharge including dual antiplatelet therapy and statins, ARB therapy was still had a superiority to ACEi therapy regarding with MACCE (hazard ratio: 0.54, 95% confidence interval: 0.30-0.98).
Conclusion:
In the multicenter cohort study, ARB therapy was associated with better one-year clinical outcomes compared to ACEi therapy in patients undergoing PCI.
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Title: Abstract 14077: One-year Outcome After PCI in Patients Treated Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers - Subanalysis From Multicenter Registry -
Description:
Background:
The prescription of inhibitors for renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is associated with improved prognosis but have respectively different mechanisms of action in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).
We aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) therapy in patients with CAD undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Methods:
This study is a subanalysis from the TWINCRE registry that is a multicentral prospective cohort including patients who underwent PCI.
After excluding 18 patients who received both ACEi and ARB from 2,896 registered patients, we ultimately evaluated 369 patients treated with ACEi, 492 with ARB and 541 without ACEi or ARB.
The primary endpoint was a major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) including death from any cause, acute coronary syndrome, stent thrombosis, stroke and hospitalization for heart failure.
The impact of RAAS inhibitors on all-cause mortality alone was also evaluated.
Results:
During the observation period with 366 days of a median follow-up, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the ARB group had the lowest rate of MACCE than other two groups (Log-rank for trend, p< for < 0.
0001, Figure).
Regarding all-cause mortality, the ARB group and ACEi group had comparable rates for MACCE, which were lower than the no-ACEi/ARB group (p< for < 0.
0001).
In a Cox regression analysis, after adjusting with age, gender, comorbidities, multivessel disease, acute myocardial infarction, and medications at discharge including dual antiplatelet therapy and statins, ARB therapy was still had a superiority to ACEi therapy regarding with MACCE (hazard ratio: 0.
54, 95% confidence interval: 0.
30-0.
98).
Conclusion:
In the multicenter cohort study, ARB therapy was associated with better one-year clinical outcomes compared to ACEi therapy in patients undergoing PCI.
Related Results
SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF THROMBOLYSIS FOLLOWED BY EARLY PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION VIA TRANSRADIAL ARTERY APPROACH IN PATIENTS WITH ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF THROMBOLYSIS FOLLOWED BY EARLY PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION VIA TRANSRADIAL ARTERY APPROACH IN PATIENTS WITH ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION
Objectives
This study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of thrombolysis followed by early PCI via transradial artery approach in patients with ST-segment...
Predictors of Major Adverse Cardiac Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Sana’a City-Yemen (Single center study)
Predictors of Major Adverse Cardiac Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Sana’a City-Yemen (Single center study)
Background: Recently, many hospitals in Yemen have been started using Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) procedure for treatment coronary artery disease (CAD), including Dr. ...
Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers on cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes and overt nephropathy: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers on cardiovascular events in patients with diabetes and overt nephropathy: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
Objective:
The efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in reducing cardiovascular outcomes in patients with diabe...
e0540 Efficacy and safety of tirofiban-assisted Delayed PCI in Patients with ST-segment elavation myocardial infarction
e0540 Efficacy and safety of tirofiban-assisted Delayed PCI in Patients with ST-segment elavation myocardial infarction
Objective
To compare the outcomes of IIb/IIIa antagonist assisted PCI within 12–72 h of onset with that of selective PCI within 7–10 days in STEMI patients.
...
Possible effects and changes of myocardial injury markers in percutaneous coronary intervention
Possible effects and changes of myocardial injury markers in percutaneous coronary intervention
Objective
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) is a technique of cardiac intervention treatment in revascularisation of coronary vessel. The use of PCI in pat...
Managing bifurcations: are two stents better than one?
Managing bifurcations: are two stents better than one?
Abstract
Introduction
Bifurcation percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with a higher degree of complexity when...
Safety and efficacy of early versus elective percutaneous coronary intervention on patients with non-ST segment elevation infarction
Safety and efficacy of early versus elective percutaneous coronary intervention on patients with non-ST segment elevation infarction
Objectives
To investigate the safety and efficacy of early percutaneous coronary intervention (early PCI) in patients with non-ST Segment elevation infarction (NS...
e0641 Contrast study of transulnar artery PCI and transradial artery PCI
e0641 Contrast study of transulnar artery PCI and transradial artery PCI
Objective
To compare the feasibility and safety of TUA-PCI to TRA-PCI (transradial artery PCI).
Methods
...

