Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Parametric and Non Parametric measures to compare Fixed and random effects of malt barley genotypes
View through CrossRef
AMMI analysis of 21 malt barley genotypes evaluated at nine locations of north western plains zone revealed highly significant variation due to environments (61.8%), G x E interactions (19.5%) and genotypes (8.2%). Further, interaction effects were partitioned into seven interactions principal components. AMMI stability Value measures (ASV1 and ASV) had considered first two interaction principal components and based on 54.1% of total interaction variations had recommended (PL926, PL931, RD2849) and (BH1036, PL931, RD2849) malt barley genotypes respectively. Modified AMMI Stability Values measures (MASV1 and MASV) had exploited nearly 97.6% of total interaction variations, based on which BH1036, DWRB219, RD2849 and BH1036, DWRB219, PL926 malt barley genotypes were identified for stable yield performance. Geometric Mean (GM) based on BLUP effects of genotypes yield was in favour of DWRB219, BH1036 and DWRB221 while corresponding to Harmonic Mean of yield values, DWRB219, BH1036, DWRB221 genotypes would be of choice. Relative Performance of Genotypic Values (RPGV) favored DWRB219, BH1036 , DWRB221 barley genotypes and Harmonic Mean of Relative Performance of Genotypic Value (HMRPGV) measure favoured DWRB219, BH1036, DWRB220 malt genotypes. Non parametric composite measure, NPi (1) , suggested that UPB1097, RD3029, DWRB218 were suitable, whereas DWRB219, RD3029, G4 genotypes would be preferable as per values NPi(2) while NPi(3) identified DWRB219, BH1036, DWRB160. The composite measure NPi(4) found DWRB219, BH1036, DWRB160 as genotypes of choice for this zone. Measures MASV, MASV1, Si1, Si3, Si4, Si5,Si6 ,Si7, Si2, NPi (1), ASV and ASV1 accounted more in first principal component, whereas NPi (2), NPi (3), NPi (4), Average, GM, HM, Mean, PRVG, HMPRVG were major contributors for second principal component. Small cluster of standard deviation (Stdev) with CV, IPC4 and IPC7 were placed in second quadrant. Smallest cluster of IPC1 and IPC6 was also observed in this quadrant. Large cluster comprised of NPi(1), Si2 ,Si5 Si2 ,Si5 ,Si6 with ASV and ASV1. Measures GM, HM, PRVG and HMPRVG considered random effects of genotypes grouped with average and placed in last quadrant while adjacent cluster of NPi(2), NPi(3), and NPi(4) observed in same quadrant. Close association among the AMMI analysis based measures had been observed with adaptability measures based on BLUP effects of malt barley genotypes in the present study based on the Biplot analysis while considering first two principal components.
EJPB, ISPB, CPBG - Tamil Nadu Agricultural University
Title: Parametric and Non Parametric measures to compare Fixed and random effects of malt barley genotypes
Description:
AMMI analysis of 21 malt barley genotypes evaluated at nine locations of north western plains zone revealed highly significant variation due to environments (61.
8%), G x E interactions (19.
5%) and genotypes (8.
2%).
Further, interaction effects were partitioned into seven interactions principal components.
AMMI stability Value measures (ASV1 and ASV) had considered first two interaction principal components and based on 54.
1% of total interaction variations had recommended (PL926, PL931, RD2849) and (BH1036, PL931, RD2849) malt barley genotypes respectively.
Modified AMMI Stability Values measures (MASV1 and MASV) had exploited nearly 97.
6% of total interaction variations, based on which BH1036, DWRB219, RD2849 and BH1036, DWRB219, PL926 malt barley genotypes were identified for stable yield performance.
Geometric Mean (GM) based on BLUP effects of genotypes yield was in favour of DWRB219, BH1036 and DWRB221 while corresponding to Harmonic Mean of yield values, DWRB219, BH1036, DWRB221 genotypes would be of choice.
Relative Performance of Genotypic Values (RPGV) favored DWRB219, BH1036 , DWRB221 barley genotypes and Harmonic Mean of Relative Performance of Genotypic Value (HMRPGV) measure favoured DWRB219, BH1036, DWRB220 malt genotypes.
Non parametric composite measure, NPi (1) , suggested that UPB1097, RD3029, DWRB218 were suitable, whereas DWRB219, RD3029, G4 genotypes would be preferable as per values NPi(2) while NPi(3) identified DWRB219, BH1036, DWRB160.
The composite measure NPi(4) found DWRB219, BH1036, DWRB160 as genotypes of choice for this zone.
Measures MASV, MASV1, Si1, Si3, Si4, Si5,Si6 ,Si7, Si2, NPi (1), ASV and ASV1 accounted more in first principal component, whereas NPi (2), NPi (3), NPi (4), Average, GM, HM, Mean, PRVG, HMPRVG were major contributors for second principal component.
Small cluster of standard deviation (Stdev) with CV, IPC4 and IPC7 were placed in second quadrant.
Smallest cluster of IPC1 and IPC6 was also observed in this quadrant.
Large cluster comprised of NPi(1), Si2 ,Si5 Si2 ,Si5 ,Si6 with ASV and ASV1.
Measures GM, HM, PRVG and HMPRVG considered random effects of genotypes grouped with average and placed in last quadrant while adjacent cluster of NPi(2), NPi(3), and NPi(4) observed in same quadrant.
Close association among the AMMI analysis based measures had been observed with adaptability measures based on BLUP effects of malt barley genotypes in the present study based on the Biplot analysis while considering first two principal components.
Related Results
Are smallholder farmers benefiting from malt barley contract farming engagement in Ethiopia?
Are smallholder farmers benefiting from malt barley contract farming engagement in Ethiopia?
Abstract
Background
It is believed that in Ethiopia barley has been cultivated before 3000BC. Among the cereals, it is ranked in fifth place and the...
British Food Journal Volume 46 Issue 11 1944
British Food Journal Volume 46 Issue 11 1944
1. From the information given to the Committee by members of the trade the following conclusions were drawn : (i) Four main types of product are sold under a name commonly includin...
Karakterisasi Enzim Pemecah Pati dari Malt Serelia
Karakterisasi Enzim Pemecah Pati dari Malt Serelia
Abstract- Starch-degrading enzymes not only can be found in bacteria and fungi, but also in plants. Some plants that produce starch-degrading enzymes are germinated grain of sorghu...
Characterization of Barley Genotypes
and Their Biochemical Responses against Leaf
Rust (<i>Puccinia hordei</i>) Disease under Cold
Arid Environment
Characterization of Barley Genotypes
and Their Biochemical Responses against Leaf
Rust (<i>Puccinia hordei</i>) Disease under Cold
Arid Environment
Cereal rust is one of the most damaging diseases of small-grain cereals. The fungus <i>Puccinia
hordei</i> causes leaf rust in barley and other small grain crops. <i...
Identifying Putative Resistance Genes for Barley Yellow Dwarf Virus-PAV in Wheat and Barley
Identifying Putative Resistance Genes for Barley Yellow Dwarf Virus-PAV in Wheat and Barley
Barley yellow dwarf viruses (BYDVs) are one of the most widespread and economically important plant viruses affecting many cereal crops. Growing resistant varieties remains the mos...
Aberrant Somatic Hypermutation in Extranodal Marginal Zone B-Cell Lymphoma of MALT Type.
Aberrant Somatic Hypermutation in Extranodal Marginal Zone B-Cell Lymphoma of MALT Type.
Abstract
Extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa associated lymphoid tissue (MALT lymphoma) accounts for approximately 7% to 8% of all non-Hodgkin lymphom...
Factors affecting precipitation use efficiency of dryland wheat and barley genotypes
Factors affecting precipitation use efficiency of dryland wheat and barley genotypes
Abstract
Available water and its efficient use are the main determinants of yield in dryland agricultural systems. In this study, the results from two-year experiments in d...
Evaluation of Improved Malt Barley Varieties in North Shewa Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia
Evaluation of Improved Malt Barley Varieties in North Shewa Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia
Malting barley is barley that will produce high quality malt. It is a specialty crop for which a premium price is paid by domestic maltters and exporters. Quality requirements for ...

