Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Parametric and Non Parametric measures to compare Fixed and random effects of malt barley genotypes

View through CrossRef
AMMI analysis of 21 malt barley genotypes evaluated at nine locations of north western plains zone revealed highly significant variation due to environments (61.8%), G x E interactions (19.5%) and genotypes (8.2%). Further, interaction effects were partitioned into seven interactions principal components. AMMI stability Value measures (ASV1 and ASV) had considered first two interaction principal  components and based on 54.1% of total interaction variations had recommended (PL926, PL931, RD2849) and (BH1036, PL931, RD2849) malt barley genotypes respectively. Modified AMMI Stability Values measures (MASV1 and  MASV) had exploited nearly 97.6% of total interaction variations, based on which BH1036, DWRB219, RD2849 and BH1036, DWRB219,  PL926 malt barley genotypes were identified for  stable yield performance. Geometric Mean (GM)  based on BLUP effects of genotypes yield was in favour of DWRB219, BH1036 and DWRB221 while corresponding to Harmonic Mean of yield values,  DWRB219, BH1036, DWRB221 genotypes would be of choice. Relative Performance of Genotypic Values (RPGV) favored DWRB219, BH1036 , DWRB221 barley genotypes and Harmonic Mean of Relative Performance of Genotypic Value (HMRPGV) measure favoured DWRB219, BH1036, DWRB220 malt genotypes. Non parametric composite measure, NPi (1) , suggested that UPB1097, RD3029, DWRB218 were suitable,  whereas DWRB219, RD3029, G4 genotypes would be preferable  as per values  NPi(2) while NPi(3)  identified  DWRB219, BH1036, DWRB160. The composite measure NPi(4)  found  DWRB219, BH1036, DWRB160 as genotypes of choice for this zone. Measures MASV, MASV1, Si1, Si3, Si4, Si5,Si6 ,Si7, Si2, NPi (1), ASV and ASV1 accounted more in first principal component, whereas NPi (2), NPi (3), NPi (4), Average,  GM, HM,  Mean,  PRVG, HMPRVG were major contributors  for second principal component. Small cluster of standard deviation (Stdev) with CV, IPC4 and IPC7 were placed in second quadrant. Smallest cluster of IPC1 and IPC6 was also observed in this quadrant. Large cluster comprised of NPi(1), Si2 ,Si5 Si2 ,Si5 ,Si6 with ASV and ASV1.  Measures GM, HM, PRVG and HMPRVG considered random effects of genotypes grouped with average and placed in last quadrant while adjacent cluster of NPi(2), NPi(3), and NPi(4)  observed in same quadrant. Close association among the AMMI analysis based measures had been observed with adaptability measures based on BLUP effects of malt barley genotypes in the present study based on the Biplot analysis while considering first two principal components.
Title: Parametric and Non Parametric measures to compare Fixed and random effects of malt barley genotypes
Description:
AMMI analysis of 21 malt barley genotypes evaluated at nine locations of north western plains zone revealed highly significant variation due to environments (61.
8%), G x E interactions (19.
5%) and genotypes (8.
2%).
Further, interaction effects were partitioned into seven interactions principal components.
AMMI stability Value measures (ASV1 and ASV) had considered first two interaction principal  components and based on 54.
1% of total interaction variations had recommended (PL926, PL931, RD2849) and (BH1036, PL931, RD2849) malt barley genotypes respectively.
Modified AMMI Stability Values measures (MASV1 and  MASV) had exploited nearly 97.
6% of total interaction variations, based on which BH1036, DWRB219, RD2849 and BH1036, DWRB219,  PL926 malt barley genotypes were identified for  stable yield performance.
Geometric Mean (GM)  based on BLUP effects of genotypes yield was in favour of DWRB219, BH1036 and DWRB221 while corresponding to Harmonic Mean of yield values,  DWRB219, BH1036, DWRB221 genotypes would be of choice.
Relative Performance of Genotypic Values (RPGV) favored DWRB219, BH1036 , DWRB221 barley genotypes and Harmonic Mean of Relative Performance of Genotypic Value (HMRPGV) measure favoured DWRB219, BH1036, DWRB220 malt genotypes.
Non parametric composite measure, NPi (1) , suggested that UPB1097, RD3029, DWRB218 were suitable,  whereas DWRB219, RD3029, G4 genotypes would be preferable  as per values  NPi(2) while NPi(3)  identified  DWRB219, BH1036, DWRB160.
The composite measure NPi(4)  found  DWRB219, BH1036, DWRB160 as genotypes of choice for this zone.
Measures MASV, MASV1, Si1, Si3, Si4, Si5,Si6 ,Si7, Si2, NPi (1), ASV and ASV1 accounted more in first principal component, whereas NPi (2), NPi (3), NPi (4), Average,  GM, HM,  Mean,  PRVG, HMPRVG were major contributors  for second principal component.
Small cluster of standard deviation (Stdev) with CV, IPC4 and IPC7 were placed in second quadrant.
Smallest cluster of IPC1 and IPC6 was also observed in this quadrant.
Large cluster comprised of NPi(1), Si2 ,Si5 Si2 ,Si5 ,Si6 with ASV and ASV1.
 Measures GM, HM, PRVG and HMPRVG considered random effects of genotypes grouped with average and placed in last quadrant while adjacent cluster of NPi(2), NPi(3), and NPi(4)  observed in same quadrant.
Close association among the AMMI analysis based measures had been observed with adaptability measures based on BLUP effects of malt barley genotypes in the present study based on the Biplot analysis while considering first two principal components.

Related Results

Are smallholder farmers benefiting from malt barley contract farming engagement in Ethiopia?
Are smallholder farmers benefiting from malt barley contract farming engagement in Ethiopia?
Abstract Background It is believed that in Ethiopia barley has been cultivated before 3000BC. Among the cereals, it is ranked in fifth place and the...
British Food Journal Volume 46 Issue 11 1944
British Food Journal Volume 46 Issue 11 1944
1. From the information given to the Committee by members of the trade the following conclusions were drawn : (i) Four main types of product are sold under a name commonly includin...
Karakterisasi Enzim Pemecah Pati dari Malt Serelia
Karakterisasi Enzim Pemecah Pati dari Malt Serelia
Abstract- Starch-degrading enzymes not only can be found in bacteria and fungi, but also in plants. Some plants that produce starch-degrading enzymes are germinated grain of sorghu...
Aberrant Somatic Hypermutation in Extranodal Marginal Zone B-Cell Lymphoma of MALT Type.
Aberrant Somatic Hypermutation in Extranodal Marginal Zone B-Cell Lymphoma of MALT Type.
Abstract Extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of mucosa associated lymphoid tissue (MALT lymphoma) accounts for approximately 7% to 8% of all non-Hodgkin lymphom...
Factors affecting precipitation use efficiency of dryland wheat and barley genotypes
Factors affecting precipitation use efficiency of dryland wheat and barley genotypes
Abstract Available water and its efficient use are the main determinants of yield in dryland agricultural systems. In this study, the results from two-year experiments in d...
Evaluation of Improved Malt Barley Varieties in North Shewa Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia
Evaluation of Improved Malt Barley Varieties in North Shewa Zone, Oromia, Ethiopia
Malting barley is barley that will produce high quality malt. It is a specialty crop for which a premium price is paid by domestic maltters and exporters. Quality requirements for ...
Preliminary screening of domestic barley and wild barley genotypes for salt tolerance
Preliminary screening of domestic barley and wild barley genotypes for salt tolerance
AbstractSalinity is a critical challenge facing productivity of barley around the world, necessitating the development of salinity tolerant varieties. Screening genotypes of two ba...
Impact of Malt Barley Varieties on Malt Quality: A Review
Impact of Malt Barley Varieties on Malt Quality: A Review
The greatest use of barley for malting purpose mostly for brewing industry. The quality of malt depends upon various grain parameters as kernel shape, size, boldness, grain protein...

Back to Top