Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Seismotectonics of the April 25, 1992, Petrolia earthquake and the Mendocino triple junction region
View through CrossRef
The April 25, 1992, Petrolia earthquake (M s 7.1) occurred at the southern tip of the Cascadia subduction zone. This is the largest thrust earthquake ever recorded instrumentally in the Cascadia subduction zone. The earthquake was followed by two large strike‐slip aftershocks (both Ms 6.6). Moment release of each of the earthquakes is as follows: 4.0 × 1019 Nm in the first 10 s for the mainshock, 0.7 × 1019 Nm in the first 8 s for the first aftershock, and 0.9 × 1019 Nm in the first 2 s for the second aftershock. These indicate that the mainshock and each of the aftershocks may have different tectonic backgrounds. The best depth estimates of the mainshock and the two aftershocks are 14 km, 18 km, and 24 km, respectively. The slip direction of the mainshock is between N75°E and N80°E. This slip direction is not consistent with either the relative motion of the North American and Juan de Fuca plates (N60°E) or between the North American plate and the Gorda deformation zone (N40°E). It has been suggested that the North American‐Pacific plate motion is accommodated by right‐lateral slip on both the San Andreas and Maacama‐Rodgers Creek‐Hayward fault systems; the intervening block is the Humboldt plate. If we modify the relative motion of the southernmost Gorda deformation zone to conform with the seismicity trends and allow the Humboldt‐Pacific plate motion to be about half the total North American‐Pacific motion, then the Gorda deformation zone‐Humboldt relative motion matches the direction of the Petrolia slip vector. Also, the mixture of focal mechanisms in the two distinct aftershock clusters can be explained by motion between the Gorda deformation zone and Pacific plate and the Humboldt and North American plates. The Gorda deformation zone is subducting beneath the Humboldt plate in the Cape Mendocino area, and the Petrolia earthquake ruptured the entire subduction segment between the Gorda deformation zone and Humboldt plate.
Title: Seismotectonics of the April 25, 1992, Petrolia earthquake and the Mendocino triple junction region
Description:
The April 25, 1992, Petrolia earthquake (M s 7.
1) occurred at the southern tip of the Cascadia subduction zone.
This is the largest thrust earthquake ever recorded instrumentally in the Cascadia subduction zone.
The earthquake was followed by two large strike‐slip aftershocks (both Ms 6.
6).
Moment release of each of the earthquakes is as follows: 4.
0 × 1019 Nm in the first 10 s for the mainshock, 0.
7 × 1019 Nm in the first 8 s for the first aftershock, and 0.
9 × 1019 Nm in the first 2 s for the second aftershock.
These indicate that the mainshock and each of the aftershocks may have different tectonic backgrounds.
The best depth estimates of the mainshock and the two aftershocks are 14 km, 18 km, and 24 km, respectively.
The slip direction of the mainshock is between N75°E and N80°E.
This slip direction is not consistent with either the relative motion of the North American and Juan de Fuca plates (N60°E) or between the North American plate and the Gorda deformation zone (N40°E).
It has been suggested that the North American‐Pacific plate motion is accommodated by right‐lateral slip on both the San Andreas and Maacama‐Rodgers Creek‐Hayward fault systems; the intervening block is the Humboldt plate.
If we modify the relative motion of the southernmost Gorda deformation zone to conform with the seismicity trends and allow the Humboldt‐Pacific plate motion to be about half the total North American‐Pacific motion, then the Gorda deformation zone‐Humboldt relative motion matches the direction of the Petrolia slip vector.
Also, the mixture of focal mechanisms in the two distinct aftershock clusters can be explained by motion between the Gorda deformation zone and Pacific plate and the Humboldt and North American plates.
The Gorda deformation zone is subducting beneath the Humboldt plate in the Cape Mendocino area, and the Petrolia earthquake ruptured the entire subduction segment between the Gorda deformation zone and Humboldt plate.
Related Results
Study the Geospace impact and the re-occurrence of pre-earthquake signals in the atmosphere: Preliminary analysis for the 2024 M 7.0 Cape Mendocino, CA and 2025 M 7.1 Southern Tibetan Plateau Earthquakes.
Study the Geospace impact and the re-occurrence of pre-earthquake signals in the atmosphere: Preliminary analysis for the 2024 M 7.0 Cape Mendocino, CA and 2025 M 7.1 Southern Tibetan Plateau Earthquakes.
This study explores the processes of generating pre-earthquake abnormalities in the atmosphere/ionosphere associated with significant seismicity. We analyzed two major earthquakes ...
Analysis of Seismic Cycle Deformation for the Ms7.1 Wushi Earthquake in Xinjiang Based on Geodetic Data
Analysis of Seismic Cycle Deformation for the Ms7.1 Wushi Earthquake in Xinjiang Based on Geodetic Data
On January 23, 2024, an Ms7.1 earthquake struck Wushi County, Aksu Prefecture, Xinjiang. While resulting in relatively limited casualties and economic losses, the event posed a cer...
Analysis of maxillofacial fracture victims in the Wenchuan earthquake and Yushu earthquake
Analysis of maxillofacial fracture victims in the Wenchuan earthquake and Yushu earthquake
Abstract – Objective: To analyze retrospectively 419 patients after the Wenchuan earthquake and 46 after Yushu earthquake with maxillofacial fractures so as to provide reference o...
Comparison of 5 and 10 Storey Frame Buildings and 5 and 10 Storey Shear Wall-Frame Buildings Under the Effect of Maras Earthquake According to the Turkish Building Earthquake Code 2018
Comparison of 5 and 10 Storey Frame Buildings and 5 and 10 Storey Shear Wall-Frame Buildings Under the Effect of Maras Earthquake According to the Turkish Building Earthquake Code 2018
In this study, the differences in the displacements, base shear forces, relative storey drifts and foundation stresses under different earthquake data on different storeys of shear...
Aftershocks of the 2 April 2024 Mw 7.4 Hualin, Taiwan Earthqauke
Aftershocks of the 2 April 2024 Mw 7.4 Hualin, Taiwan Earthqauke
ABSTRACT
A devastating Mw 7.4 earthquake occurred in Taiwan on the 2 April 2024 at 23:58:11 UTC claiming 14 human lives, injuring over 1000 and causing wide spread s...
Detect and characterize swarm-like seismicity
Detect and characterize swarm-like seismicity
Tectonic earthquake swarms exhibit a distinct temporal and spatial pattern compared to mainshock-aftershock sequences. Unlike the latter ones, where the earthquake sequence typical...
Application of apparent strong earthquake activity pattern in operational earthquake forecasting
Application of apparent strong earthquake activity pattern in operational earthquake forecasting
Abstract
Consulting the Catalogue of the International Seismological Centre (ISC), for the period 1904–2016 to detect the occurrence of potentially damaging earthquakes we ...
A unified geodetic data-based earthquake catalog of Taiwan from 2006 to 2018
A unified geodetic data-based earthquake catalog of Taiwan from 2006 to 2018
A unified geodetic data-based earthquake catalog may provide the asperity information to improve the seismic hazard assessment. Therefore, we propose a unified geodetic data-based ...

