Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Bioenergy production chain development in the Netherlands: key factors for success

View through CrossRef
AbstractDevelopment of bioenergy production in the Netherlands is lagging. This paper presents an inventory of problems met by new bioenergy chains and compares these to literature and to other countries. Theoretical frameworks suggest that five elements are crucial for successful bioenergy chain development: (i) availability of (proven) technology; (ii) access to information; (iii) access to feedstocks, financial means, and markets; (iv) locations for new installations; and (v) efficient lobby activities and public support. Nine bioenergy chains were interviewed. Problems that are reported relate to insufficient knowledge of new technological concepts, and of nuisances (noise, emission, odor, and other) caused during bioenergy production. Feedstock markets (wood, byproducts, waste) and product markets (heat, CO2) are underdeveloped, while some chains are experiencing extra problems finding a suitable location or obtaining necessary permits. Problems related to insufficient public support are most relevant for bioenergy chains depending on tax exemptions (pure vegetation oil transportation fuels) or requiring adaptation of legislation (location permits for farm fermenters). An international comparison to barriers for biofuel suggests that economic factors (including lack of capital), limitations in know‐how and institutional capacities, underdeveloped biomass and carbon markets, problems in chain coordination, and limited public support are largest problems for new bioenergy chains. Recommendations to stimulate bioenergy production in the Netherlands refer to performance standards for new installation types, information on feedstock availability, protocols for heat exchange and on improved credit facilities. © 2010 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
Title: Bioenergy production chain development in the Netherlands: key factors for success
Description:
AbstractDevelopment of bioenergy production in the Netherlands is lagging.
This paper presents an inventory of problems met by new bioenergy chains and compares these to literature and to other countries.
Theoretical frameworks suggest that five elements are crucial for successful bioenergy chain development: (i) availability of (proven) technology; (ii) access to information; (iii) access to feedstocks, financial means, and markets; (iv) locations for new installations; and (v) efficient lobby activities and public support.
Nine bioenergy chains were interviewed.
Problems that are reported relate to insufficient knowledge of new technological concepts, and of nuisances (noise, emission, odor, and other) caused during bioenergy production.
Feedstock markets (wood, byproducts, waste) and product markets (heat, CO2) are underdeveloped, while some chains are experiencing extra problems finding a suitable location or obtaining necessary permits.
Problems related to insufficient public support are most relevant for bioenergy chains depending on tax exemptions (pure vegetation oil transportation fuels) or requiring adaptation of legislation (location permits for farm fermenters).
An international comparison to barriers for biofuel suggests that economic factors (including lack of capital), limitations in know‐how and institutional capacities, underdeveloped biomass and carbon markets, problems in chain coordination, and limited public support are largest problems for new bioenergy chains.
Recommendations to stimulate bioenergy production in the Netherlands refer to performance standards for new installation types, information on feedstock availability, protocols for heat exchange and on improved credit facilities.
© 2010 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Related Results

Should China subsidize cofiring to meet its 2020 bioenergy target? A spatio‐techno‐economic analysis
Should China subsidize cofiring to meet its 2020 bioenergy target? A spatio‐techno‐economic analysis
AbstractChina has developed ambitious bioenergy installation targets as part of its broader goals to increase its renewable energy‐generating capacity and decarbonize its economy. ...
Applications of artificial intelligence‐based modeling for bioenergy systems: A review
Applications of artificial intelligence‐based modeling for bioenergy systems: A review
AbstractBioenergy is widely considered a sustainable alternative to fossil fuels. However, large‐scale applications of biomass‐based energy products are limited due to challenges r...
Is woody bioenergy carbon neutral? A comparative assessment of emissions from consumption of woody bioenergy and fossil fuel
Is woody bioenergy carbon neutral? A comparative assessment of emissions from consumption of woody bioenergy and fossil fuel
AbstractUnder the current accounting systems, emissions produced when biomass is burnt for energy are accounted as zero, resulting in what is referred to as the ‘carbon neutrality’...
Problems and Prospects of Realizing the Bioenergy Potential of Ukraine
Problems and Prospects of Realizing the Bioenergy Potential of Ukraine
The article examines the key challenges facing the Ukrainian energy sector and explores global energy development trends in the 21st century, emphasizing the growing importance of ...
Natural climate solutions versus bioenergy: Can carbon benefits of natural succession compete with bioenergy from short rotation coppice?
Natural climate solutions versus bioenergy: Can carbon benefits of natural succession compete with bioenergy from short rotation coppice?
AbstractShort rotation plantations are often considered as holding vast potentials for future global bioenergy supply. In contrast to raising biomass harvests in forests, purpose‐g...
Prospects of Bioenergy Cropping Systems for A More Social-Ecologically Sound Bioeconomy
Prospects of Bioenergy Cropping Systems for A More Social-Ecologically Sound Bioeconomy
The growing bioeconomy will require a greater supply of biomass in the future for both bioenergy and bio-based products. Today, many bioenergy cropping systems (BCS) are suboptimal...
Carbon balance indicator for forest bioenergy scenarios
Carbon balance indicator for forest bioenergy scenarios
AbstractA carbon (C) balance indicator is presented for the evaluation of forest bioenergy scenarios as a means to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. A bioenergy‐intensive scen...
Sustainable Forest Bioenergy Development Strategies in Indochina: Collaborative Effort to Establish Regional Policies
Sustainable Forest Bioenergy Development Strategies in Indochina: Collaborative Effort to Establish Regional Policies
We conducted a feasibility study in Indochina (Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam) with the aim of promoting biomass and bioenergy markets, technology transfer, rural d...

Back to Top