Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Should China subsidize cofiring to meet its 2020 bioenergy target? A spatio‐techno‐economic analysis

View through CrossRef
AbstractChina has developed ambitious bioenergy installation targets as part of its broader goals to increase its renewable energy‐generating capacity and decarbonize its economy. A key target feedstock for bioenergy is the 800 million tonnes of agricultural residues that China produces each year. At present, the main financial incentive to support bioenergy generation from agricultural residues is a feed‐in‐tariff provided for bioenergy that is produced by units that take 80% or more of their feedstock energy from biomass. Although this policy has catalysed the construction of many bioenergy units, there are reports that these projects are experiencing serious financial and technical problems, leading to low operational efficiency and even closure. An alternative option for China's agricultural residues is cofiring with coal in existing power stations. However, this is currently unprofitable for power station operators, as cofiring is not eligible for financial assistance through the bioenergy feed‐in‐tariff. In the light of China's ambitious target to install 30GW of bioenergy generation capacity by 2020, this study investigates the extent to which extension of the bioenergy feed‐in‐tariff to include cofiring could contribute towards this goal. The results suggest that 39% of China's straw energy resources are located within 50 km of a power station. Assuming cofiring ratios of up to 10% coal energy replacement, an annual 89–117TWh of electricity could be generated by cofiring agricultural residues collected within 50 km radii of power stations. If China extends its bioenergy subsidies to include cofiring, an annual 62–92TWh can be produced at an internal rate of return of 8% or more. This equates to 42–62% of the bioenergy generation that China might expect if it met its 2020 target of installing 30GW of bioenergy capacity. Overall, this indicates a strong case for the Chinese government to extend its existing bioenergy feed‐in‐tariff to include cofiring at low energy replacement ratios.
Title: Should China subsidize cofiring to meet its 2020 bioenergy target? A spatio‐techno‐economic analysis
Description:
AbstractChina has developed ambitious bioenergy installation targets as part of its broader goals to increase its renewable energy‐generating capacity and decarbonize its economy.
A key target feedstock for bioenergy is the 800 million tonnes of agricultural residues that China produces each year.
At present, the main financial incentive to support bioenergy generation from agricultural residues is a feed‐in‐tariff provided for bioenergy that is produced by units that take 80% or more of their feedstock energy from biomass.
Although this policy has catalysed the construction of many bioenergy units, there are reports that these projects are experiencing serious financial and technical problems, leading to low operational efficiency and even closure.
An alternative option for China's agricultural residues is cofiring with coal in existing power stations.
However, this is currently unprofitable for power station operators, as cofiring is not eligible for financial assistance through the bioenergy feed‐in‐tariff.
In the light of China's ambitious target to install 30GW of bioenergy generation capacity by 2020, this study investigates the extent to which extension of the bioenergy feed‐in‐tariff to include cofiring could contribute towards this goal.
The results suggest that 39% of China's straw energy resources are located within 50 km of a power station.
Assuming cofiring ratios of up to 10% coal energy replacement, an annual 89–117TWh of electricity could be generated by cofiring agricultural residues collected within 50 km radii of power stations.
If China extends its bioenergy subsidies to include cofiring, an annual 62–92TWh can be produced at an internal rate of return of 8% or more.
This equates to 42–62% of the bioenergy generation that China might expect if it met its 2020 target of installing 30GW of bioenergy capacity.
Overall, this indicates a strong case for the Chinese government to extend its existing bioenergy feed‐in‐tariff to include cofiring at low energy replacement ratios.

Related Results

KECEMASAN SAAT PANDEMI COVID 19: LITERATUR REVIEW Hardiyati, Efri Widianti, Taty Hernawaty Departemen Keperawatan Jiwa Poltekkes Kemenkes Mamuju Sulbar, Universitas Pad...
Is woody bioenergy carbon neutral? A comparative assessment of emissions from consumption of woody bioenergy and fossil fuel
Is woody bioenergy carbon neutral? A comparative assessment of emissions from consumption of woody bioenergy and fossil fuel
AbstractUnder the current accounting systems, emissions produced when biomass is burnt for energy are accounted as zero, resulting in what is referred to as the ‘carbon neutrality’...
Current Perspectives on Cystic Echinococcosis: A Systematic Review
Current Perspectives on Cystic Echinococcosis: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction: Hydatidosis, a zoonotic disease caused by the larval stage of Echinococcus granulosus, is a significant public health concern with notable economic impact. I...
Applications of artificial intelligence‐based modeling for bioenergy systems: A review
Applications of artificial intelligence‐based modeling for bioenergy systems: A review
AbstractBioenergy is widely considered a sustainable alternative to fossil fuels. However, large‐scale applications of biomass‐based energy products are limited due to challenges r...
STRATEGI PENGEMBANGAN TECHNO PARK PERIKANAN BUDIDAYA
STRATEGI PENGEMBANGAN TECHNO PARK PERIKANAN BUDIDAYA
<p>Dewasa ini Indonesia termasuk dalam kategori negara yang berada pada tahap efficiency driven, yakni suatu kondisi perekonomian yang berbasis pada proses produksi yang efis...
Doklam Standoff Resolution: Interview of Major General S B Asthana by SCMP
Doklam Standoff Resolution: Interview of Major General S B Asthana by SCMP
(Views of Major General S B Asthana,SM,VSM, (Veteran), Questioned by Jiangtao Shi of South China Morning Post on 29 August 2017.Question 1 (SCMP)Are you surprised that the over 70-...
Exploring the Role of Bioenergy in Achieving Sustainable Waste Utilization and Promoting Low-Carbon Transition Strategies
Exploring the Role of Bioenergy in Achieving Sustainable Waste Utilization and Promoting Low-Carbon Transition Strategies
The growing global emphasis on sustainable development and carbon neutrality has intensified the need for innovative waste utilization strategies that align with low-carbon transit...
Bioenergy production chain development in the Netherlands: key factors for success
Bioenergy production chain development in the Netherlands: key factors for success
AbstractDevelopment of bioenergy production in the Netherlands is lagging. This paper presents an inventory of problems met by new bioenergy chains and compares these to literature...

Back to Top