Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Geophysics outstanding reviewers

View through CrossRef
The value of a good peer review system cannot be overestimated. Each scientific journal receives “good, bad, and ugly” papers. Fortunately, Geophysics receives many good papers, but, occasionally, a beautifully written paper may hide bad science. On the other hand, a paper in which good science is hidden by bad writing is ugly. It is the task of editors and reviewers to distinguish between good, bad, and ugly papers; to pass the really good; reject the really bad; and lift the quality of everything else to the high standards of Geophysics. I very much appreciate the excellent and hard work of the editorial team and all reviewers. The following is a recognition of those who have gone the extra mile.
Society of Exploration Geophysicists
Title: Geophysics outstanding reviewers
Description:
The value of a good peer review system cannot be overestimated.
Each scientific journal receives “good, bad, and ugly” papers.
Fortunately, Geophysics receives many good papers, but, occasionally, a beautifully written paper may hide bad science.
On the other hand, a paper in which good science is hidden by bad writing is ugly.
It is the task of editors and reviewers to distinguish between good, bad, and ugly papers; to pass the really good; reject the really bad; and lift the quality of everything else to the high standards of Geophysics.
I very much appreciate the excellent and hard work of the editorial team and all reviewers.
The following is a recognition of those who have gone the extra mile.

Related Results

Challenges faced in the peer review system in open access journals
Challenges faced in the peer review system in open access journals
The whole mechanism of academic journal’s peer review system process effectively depends on how editors manage the journal work. The handling of the peer review system will determi...
Identifying Patterns and Motivations of ‘Mega’ Peer-Reviewers
Identifying Patterns and Motivations of ‘Mega’ Peer-Reviewers
Abstract Background. The demand for peer reviewers is disproportionate to the supply and availability of reviewers. Identifying the factors associated with peer review beha...
Acknowledgement to Reviewers 2025
Acknowledgement to Reviewers 2025
The strength and credibility of a scientific journal rest upon the rigor, fairness, and dedication of its peer-review process. At Annals of Geophysics, peer review is not merely a ...
President's Page
President's Page
Key components of the SEG strategy are to become the trusted “go-to” source for information about applied geophysics, to connect the world of applied geophysics, to connect geology...
Outstanding Reviewers
Outstanding Reviewers
The 2013–2015 Geophysics Editorial Board has been working for one year now. My team of editors works with reviewers and authors to continue the tradition of providing a fair, profe...
[Papers on marine fossils of various periods]
[Papers on marine fossils of various periods]
<p dir="ltr">Works submitted by Norcott de Bisson Hornibrook to Victoria University of Wellington for a Doctor of Science degree.</p><ol><li>Hornibrook, N. ...
Rethinking Grant Peer Review
Rethinking Grant Peer Review
The author is a professor in the Department of Opthalmology and the Program in Cell and Molecular Biology at the Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO. I and oth...

Back to Top