Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Acknowledgement to Reviewers 2025

View through CrossRef
The strength and credibility of a scientific journal rest upon the rigor, fairness, and dedication of its peer-review process. At Annals of Geophysics, peer review is not merely a procedural step; it is the foundation upon which the quality and integrity of our published research are built. On behalf of the Editorial Board of Annals of Geophysics, I wish to express our deepest gratitude to all the reviewers who, throughout the year, have generously devoted their time, expertise, and thoughtful judgment to the evaluation of submitted manuscripts. Their careful assessments, constructive recommendations, and commitment to high scientific standards ensure that the research we publish is original, methodologically sound, and relevant to the broader geoscientific community. As a Diamond Open Access journal, Annals of Geophysics is committed to making high-quality scientific research freely accessible to the global community without financial barriers for authors or readers. In this model, the contribution of reviewers becomes even more essential, as the strength and sustainability of the journal rely fundamentally on academic service, shared responsibility, and scholarly integrity. Thanks in no small part to their dedication, Annals of Geophysics has continued to strengthen its scientific standing. In 2025, the journal recorded an improvement in its Impact Factor, a result that reflects both the quality of the contributions we receive and the rigor of the evaluation process that shapes them. This achievement is the outcome of a collective effort involving authors, reviewers, and the Editorial Board working together to uphold the highest standards of scientific publishing. Peer review remains one of the most essential expressions of academic responsibility and collegiality. The continued growth, credibility, and international visibility of the journal depend directly on this shared commitment to excellence. For this reason, the Editorial Board is particularly pleased to recognize the Top 10 Outstanding Reviewers of 2025. Selected on the basis of the number of completed reviews, timeliness, and the depth and constructiveness of their reports between January 1 and December 31, 2025, these colleagues have made an exceptional contribution to improving the quality of manuscripts and strengthening the journal as a whole. To all our reviewers, we extend our sincere appreciation. We look forward to continuing this collaborative work in advancing the quality, integrity, and impact of Annals of Geophysics in the years ahead.
Title: Acknowledgement to Reviewers 2025
Description:
The strength and credibility of a scientific journal rest upon the rigor, fairness, and dedication of its peer-review process.
At Annals of Geophysics, peer review is not merely a procedural step; it is the foundation upon which the quality and integrity of our published research are built.
 On behalf of the Editorial Board of Annals of Geophysics, I wish to express our deepest gratitude to all the reviewers who, throughout the year, have generously devoted their time, expertise, and thoughtful judgment to the evaluation of submitted manuscripts.
Their careful assessments, constructive recommendations, and commitment to high scientific standards ensure that the research we publish is original, methodologically sound, and relevant to the broader geoscientific community.
 As a Diamond Open Access journal, Annals of Geophysics is committed to making high-quality scientific research freely accessible to the global community without financial barriers for authors or readers.
In this model, the contribution of reviewers becomes even more essential, as the strength and sustainability of the journal rely fundamentally on academic service, shared responsibility, and scholarly integrity.
 Thanks in no small part to their dedication, Annals of Geophysics has continued to strengthen its scientific standing.
In 2025, the journal recorded an improvement in its Impact Factor, a result that reflects both the quality of the contributions we receive and the rigor of the evaluation process that shapes them.
This achievement is the outcome of a collective effort involving authors, reviewers, and the Editorial Board working together to uphold the highest standards of scientific publishing.
 Peer review remains one of the most essential expressions of academic responsibility and collegiality.
The continued growth, credibility, and international visibility of the journal depend directly on this shared commitment to excellence.
 For this reason, the Editorial Board is particularly pleased to recognize the Top 10 Outstanding Reviewers of 2025.
Selected on the basis of the number of completed reviews, timeliness, and the depth and constructiveness of their reports between January 1 and December 31, 2025, these colleagues have made an exceptional contribution to improving the quality of manuscripts and strengthening the journal as a whole.
 To all our reviewers, we extend our sincere appreciation.
We look forward to continuing this collaborative work in advancing the quality, integrity, and impact of Annals of Geophysics in the years ahead.

Related Results

Challenges faced in the peer review system in open access journals
Challenges faced in the peer review system in open access journals
The whole mechanism of academic journal’s peer review system process effectively depends on how editors manage the journal work. The handling of the peer review system will determi...
Identifying Patterns and Motivations of ‘Mega’ Peer-Reviewers
Identifying Patterns and Motivations of ‘Mega’ Peer-Reviewers
Abstract Background. The demand for peer reviewers is disproportionate to the supply and availability of reviewers. Identifying the factors associated with peer review beha...
Acknowledgement to Reviewers of Genes in 2016
Acknowledgement to Reviewers of Genes in 2016
The editors of Genes would like to express their sincere gratitude to the following reviewers for assessing manuscripts in 2016. We greatly appreciate the contribution of expert re...
Rethinking Grant Peer Review
Rethinking Grant Peer Review
The author is a professor in the Department of Opthalmology and the Program in Cell and Molecular Biology at the Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO. I and oth...
ILOKUSI KOMUNIKATIF DALAM NOVEL THE PERFECT WORLD OF MIWAKO SUMIDA KARYA CLARISSA GOENAWAN
ILOKUSI KOMUNIKATIF DALAM NOVEL THE PERFECT WORLD OF MIWAKO SUMIDA KARYA CLARISSA GOENAWAN
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk (1) mendeskripsikan jenis Ilokusi Komunikatif dalam Novel The Perfect World of Miwako Sumida karya Clarissa Goenawan (2) mendeskripsikan fungsi Iloku...
Erratum to “Acknowledgment of Reviewers”
Erratum to “Acknowledgment of Reviewers”
Aponte, J. (2017): Acknowledgment of Reviewers. Hispanic Health Care International, 15, 200. Doi: 10.1177/1540415317746248 In the above “Acknowledgement of Review...
Acknowledgement to Reviewers of <i>OBM Transplantation</i> in 2024
Acknowledgement to Reviewers of <i>OBM Transplantation</i> in 2024
The editors of <em>OBM Transplantation</em> would like to express their sincere gratitude to the following reviewers for assessing manuscripts in 2024. We greatly appre...
Acknowledgement to Reviewers of OBM Transplantation in 2021
Acknowledgement to Reviewers of OBM Transplantation in 2021
The editors of OBM Transplantation would like to express their sincere gratitude to the following reviewers for assessing manuscripts in 2021. We greatly appreciate the contributio...

Back to Top