Javascript must be enabled to continue!
‘God corresponds to Godself’: John Webster's doctrine of God ‘after’ Karl Barth
View through CrossRef
AbstractThe nature and extent of Karl Barth's significance in John Webster's theological formation is widely recognised but remains to be explored in detail. Addressing this lacuna, this essay considers how Barth's doctrine of the triune God animates Webster's teaching on the same. In approaching the topic, I show how Webster carries forward Barth's deep sense of God's aseity in relation to the world and follows Barth in his commitment to the singularity of God's triune being. God's particularity and aseity converge in ‘God's self-correspondence’ (namely, that God ‘in Godself’ corresponds to God ‘for us’), which represents the core of Barth's influence on Webster's theology proper. The final section responds to Katherine Sonderegger's recent criticism of Webster's ‘relationalism’, which counts God's relation to creatures as an integral aspect of God's eternal life. I reframe the issue in terms of Webster's late-career retractions of the language of inclusion and divine self-determination, arguing that the difficulties that Sonderegger identifies in earlier writings are overcome in the final decade of Webster's corpus.
Title: ‘God corresponds to Godself’: John Webster's doctrine of God ‘after’ Karl Barth
Description:
AbstractThe nature and extent of Karl Barth's significance in John Webster's theological formation is widely recognised but remains to be explored in detail.
Addressing this lacuna, this essay considers how Barth's doctrine of the triune God animates Webster's teaching on the same.
In approaching the topic, I show how Webster carries forward Barth's deep sense of God's aseity in relation to the world and follows Barth in his commitment to the singularity of God's triune being.
God's particularity and aseity converge in ‘God's self-correspondence’ (namely, that God ‘in Godself’ corresponds to God ‘for us’), which represents the core of Barth's influence on Webster's theology proper.
The final section responds to Katherine Sonderegger's recent criticism of Webster's ‘relationalism’, which counts God's relation to creatures as an integral aspect of God's eternal life.
I reframe the issue in terms of Webster's late-career retractions of the language of inclusion and divine self-determination, arguing that the difficulties that Sonderegger identifies in earlier writings are overcome in the final decade of Webster's corpus.
Related Results
Finding the Major Questions Doctrine
Finding the Major Questions Doctrine
<p>The major questions doctrine has been invoked primarily in the rulemaking context, where it requires agencies to identify particularly clear statutory au...
Karl Barth and the Purification of Divine Simplicity
Karl Barth and the Purification of Divine Simplicity
AbstractJohnson investigates Karl Barth's critical appropriation of the doctrine of divine simplicity. While Barth is critical of traditional formulations of the doctrine, he under...
Apokatastasisand apostolicity: a response to Oliver Crisp on the question of Barth's universalism
Apokatastasisand apostolicity: a response to Oliver Crisp on the question of Barth's universalism
AbstractOliver Crisp argues that Karl Barth is incoherent on the question of universal salvation. Making use of a modal distinction between contingent and necessary universalism, C...
Barth and Reformation Theology
Barth and Reformation Theology
Karl Barth seeks to restore the Gospel to the centre of Protestant theology by orienting dogmatic theology to the witness of the prophetic and apostolic authors of Scripture and to...
Exploring the Intersection
Exploring the Intersection
This study examines process theology from the perspective of Karl Barth’s theology, aiming to identify the similarities and differences between the two. A literature review was con...
Conclusion: Barth’s Dreams
Conclusion: Barth’s Dreams
This concluding chapter to the collection of experiments with Karl Barth and comparative theology explores the two great moments in Barth’s relationship to religions: critique of a...
Barth and Roman Catholicism
Barth and Roman Catholicism
This chapter provides an interpretative lens for understanding Karl Barth’s dialogue with Roman Catholicism. The central argument is that Barth’s engagement with Roman Catholic the...
Echoes of Paul in the Ethics of Barth: Pauline Themes in Karl Barth's Ethics of Creation
Echoes of Paul in the Ethics of Barth: Pauline Themes in Karl Barth's Ethics of Creation
This article examines the biblical echoes of the apostle Paul in the moral reflection of Karl Barth in his ethics of creation. Specifically, it seeks to demonstrate that Pauline th...

