Javascript must be enabled to continue!
‘God corresponds to Godself’: John Webster's doctrine of God ‘after’ Karl Barth
View through CrossRef
AbstractThe nature and extent of Karl Barth's significance in John Webster's theological formation is widely recognised but remains to be explored in detail. Addressing this lacuna, this essay considers how Barth's doctrine of the triune God animates Webster's teaching on the same. In approaching the topic, I show how Webster carries forward Barth's deep sense of God's aseity in relation to the world and follows Barth in his commitment to the singularity of God's triune being. God's particularity and aseity converge in ‘God's self-correspondence’ (namely, that God ‘in Godself’ corresponds to God ‘for us’), which represents the core of Barth's influence on Webster's theology proper. The final section responds to Katherine Sonderegger's recent criticism of Webster's ‘relationalism’, which counts God's relation to creatures as an integral aspect of God's eternal life. I reframe the issue in terms of Webster's late-career retractions of the language of inclusion and divine self-determination, arguing that the difficulties that Sonderegger identifies in earlier writings are overcome in the final decade of Webster's corpus.
Title: ‘God corresponds to Godself’: John Webster's doctrine of God ‘after’ Karl Barth
Description:
AbstractThe nature and extent of Karl Barth's significance in John Webster's theological formation is widely recognised but remains to be explored in detail.
Addressing this lacuna, this essay considers how Barth's doctrine of the triune God animates Webster's teaching on the same.
In approaching the topic, I show how Webster carries forward Barth's deep sense of God's aseity in relation to the world and follows Barth in his commitment to the singularity of God's triune being.
God's particularity and aseity converge in ‘God's self-correspondence’ (namely, that God ‘in Godself’ corresponds to God ‘for us’), which represents the core of Barth's influence on Webster's theology proper.
The final section responds to Katherine Sonderegger's recent criticism of Webster's ‘relationalism’, which counts God's relation to creatures as an integral aspect of God's eternal life.
I reframe the issue in terms of Webster's late-career retractions of the language of inclusion and divine self-determination, arguing that the difficulties that Sonderegger identifies in earlier writings are overcome in the final decade of Webster's corpus.
Related Results
Finding the Major Questions Doctrine
Finding the Major Questions Doctrine
<p>The major questions doctrine has been invoked primarily in the rulemaking context, where it requires agencies to identify particularly clear statutory au...
Apokatastasisand apostolicity: a response to Oliver Crisp on the question of Barth's universalism
Apokatastasisand apostolicity: a response to Oliver Crisp on the question of Barth's universalism
AbstractOliver Crisp argues that Karl Barth is incoherent on the question of universal salvation. Making use of a modal distinction between contingent and necessary universalism, C...
Conclusion: Barth’s Dreams
Conclusion: Barth’s Dreams
This concluding chapter to the collection of experiments with Karl Barth and comparative theology explores the two great moments in Barth’s relationship to religions: critique of a...
A Troubled “Ménage à Trois”
A Troubled “Ménage à Trois”
The closeness of the relationship between Barth and Charlotte von Kirschbaum remained publicly unknown for a long time. Only the third volume the Barth-Thurneysen correspondence (p...
Barth and the Evangelicals – Engaging with Barth: Contemporary Evangelical Critiques – Edited by David Gibson and Daniel Strange
Barth and the Evangelicals – Engaging with Barth: Contemporary Evangelical Critiques – Edited by David Gibson and Daniel Strange
AbstractThis review examines twelve conservative evangelical responses to David Gibson and Daniel Strange's Engaging with Barth. Witten in a charitable spirit that gives deference ...
The Impossible Possibility
The Impossible Possibility
AbstractThe word ‘coinherence’ made an early entrance in a lecture that Williams gave on the theologian Karl Barth in 1939. Williams’ fascination with Barth’s phrase ‘impossible po...
Karl Barth's Doctrine of Sanctification
Karl Barth's Doctrine of Sanctification
This book explores Karl Barth’s doctrine of sanctification as set out in “The Sanctification of Man,” §66 of the Church Dogmatics. In his analysis, Michael Bartholomaeus reflects o...

