Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Micromechanical modeling of the contact stiffness of an osseointegrated bone–implant interface

View through CrossRef
AbstractBackgroundThe surgical success of cementless implants is determined by the evolution of the biomechanical properties of the bone–implant interface (BII). One difficulty to model the biomechanical behavior of the BII comes from the implant surface roughness and from the partial contact between bone tissue and the implant. The determination of the constitutive law of the BII would be of interest in the context of implant finite element (FE) modeling to take into account the imperfect characteristics of the BII. The aim of the present study is to determine an effective contact stiffness$$\left( {K_{c}^{\text{FEM}} } \right)$$KcFEMof an osseointegrated BII accounting for its micromechanical features such as surface roughness, bone–implant contact ratio (BIC) and periprosthetic bone properties. To do so, a 2D FE model of the BII under normal contact conditions was developed and was used to determine the behavior of$$K_{c}^{\text{FEM}}$$KcFEM.ResultsThe model is validated by comparison with three analytical schemes based on micromechanical homogenization including two Lekesiz’s models (considering interacting and non-interacting micro-cracks) and a Kachanov’s model.$$K_{c}^{\text{FEM}}$$KcFEMis found to be comprised between 1013and 1015 N/m3according to the properties of the BII.$$K_{c}^{\text{FEM}}$$KcFEMis shown to increase nonlinearly as a function of the BIC and to decrease as a function of the roughness amplitude for high BIC values (above around 20%). Moreover,$$K_{c}^{\text{FEM}}$$KcFEMdecreases as a function of the roughness wavelength and increases linearly as a function of the Young’s modulus of periprosthetic bone tissue.ConclusionsThese results open new paths in implant biomechanical modeling since this model may be used in future macroscopic finite element models modeling the bone–implant system to replace perfectly rigid BII conditions.
Title: Micromechanical modeling of the contact stiffness of an osseointegrated bone–implant interface
Description:
AbstractBackgroundThe surgical success of cementless implants is determined by the evolution of the biomechanical properties of the bone–implant interface (BII).
One difficulty to model the biomechanical behavior of the BII comes from the implant surface roughness and from the partial contact between bone tissue and the implant.
The determination of the constitutive law of the BII would be of interest in the context of implant finite element (FE) modeling to take into account the imperfect characteristics of the BII.
The aim of the present study is to determine an effective contact stiffness$$\left( {K_{c}^{\text{FEM}} } \right)$$KcFEMof an osseointegrated BII accounting for its micromechanical features such as surface roughness, bone–implant contact ratio (BIC) and periprosthetic bone properties.
To do so, a 2D FE model of the BII under normal contact conditions was developed and was used to determine the behavior of$$K_{c}^{\text{FEM}}$$KcFEM.
ResultsThe model is validated by comparison with three analytical schemes based on micromechanical homogenization including two Lekesiz’s models (considering interacting and non-interacting micro-cracks) and a Kachanov’s model.
$$K_{c}^{\text{FEM}}$$KcFEMis found to be comprised between 1013and 1015 N/m3according to the properties of the BII.
$$K_{c}^{\text{FEM}}$$KcFEMis shown to increase nonlinearly as a function of the BIC and to decrease as a function of the roughness amplitude for high BIC values (above around 20%).
Moreover,$$K_{c}^{\text{FEM}}$$KcFEMdecreases as a function of the roughness wavelength and increases linearly as a function of the Young’s modulus of periprosthetic bone tissue.
ConclusionsThese results open new paths in implant biomechanical modeling since this model may be used in future macroscopic finite element models modeling the bone–implant system to replace perfectly rigid BII conditions.

Related Results

Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Frequency of Common Chromosomal Abnormalities in Patients with Idiopathic Acquired Aplastic Anemia
Objective: To determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population idiopathic determine the frequency of common chromosomal aberrations in local population...
Implant‐Abutment Interface: Biomechanical Study of Flat Top versus Conical
Implant‐Abutment Interface: Biomechanical Study of Flat Top versus Conical
ABSTRACT Background: Overloading has been identified as a primary factor behind dental implant failure. The peak bone stresses normally appear in the marginal bone. The anchorage s...
Soft tissue reconstructive techniques at implant sites
Soft tissue reconstructive techniques at implant sites
Dental implants have shown to be a reliable tool for single, multiple and full-arch rehabilitations 1. Dental implants have a very high success rate in terms of osseointegration, h...
Effect of PTH and corticotomy on implant movement under mechanical force
Effect of PTH and corticotomy on implant movement under mechanical force
Abstract Background Osseointegrated implants are considered as clinically non-movable. Parathyroid hormone (PTH) is known to play a significant role in the regulation of b...
Poster 107: The Use of Coacervate Sustained Release System to Identify the Most Potent BMP for Bone Regeneration
Poster 107: The Use of Coacervate Sustained Release System to Identify the Most Potent BMP for Bone Regeneration
Objectives: Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) belong to the transforming growth factor superfamily that were first discovered by Marshall Urist. There are 14 B...
Influence of Roxolid Implant Material on The Implant Stability of Maxillary Implant Retained Overdenture
Influence of Roxolid Implant Material on The Implant Stability of Maxillary Implant Retained Overdenture
Abstract Background Long-term success of implant restoration depends on many factors one of them is the sufficient implant stability which is lowered in compromised bone d...

Back to Top