Javascript must be enabled to continue!
COMPARISON OF HEMODYNAMIC EFFECT CAUSED BY INTRATHECAL LOW DOSE ADMINISTRATION OF 0.5% AGAINST 0.75% HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LOWER LIMB SURGERY UNDER UNILATERAL SPINAL ANAESTHESIA
View through CrossRef
Background: Spinal anaesthesia has its unique place in modern anaesthetic practice. In past, most of the surgeries, irrespective of the site of surgery, were performed in general anaesthesia but now in the modern anaesthetic field, spinal anaesthesia has markedly replaced general anaesthesia, specifically in obstetrics, lower limbs, and abdominal surgeries. Methods: A total of 100 patients fit to undergo lower limb surgery between the ages of 20 to 70 years were included in the study. 50 patients were in 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (Group A) while 50 patients were in the 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine group (Group B). Patients with a history of allergies to local anaesthetics, ischemic heart disease and contraindications to spinal anaesthesia were excluded. At the end of the injection, the patient was immediately laid down and tilted to 30 degrees lateral on the operative side for unilateral anaesthesia. Mean arterial pressure at baseline, 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes was recorded by trainee anaesthesia. A baseline was taken of mean arterial pressure measured 15 minutes before induction of spinal anaesthesia in a lying position. Results: The mean baseline arterial pressure of patients in group A was 88.72±1.71 mmHg and in group B was 88.94±1.95 mmHg. Mean arterial pressure MAP at 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes in both groups was as follows; 86.22±2.55 vs 81.78±1.52 mmHg, 83.72±3.36 vs 75.84±1.34 mmHg, 80.02±3.40 vs 70.90±0.97 mmHg and 77.14±4.24 vs 66.06±1.62 mmHg respectively (p-value <0.05). Conclusion: This study concluded that the hemodynamic parameters in terms of mean arterial pressure remained more stable by deviating less from the baseline value with the use of a low dose of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine instead of 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing lower limb surgery under unilateral spinal anaesthesia.
Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad Pakistan
Title: COMPARISON OF HEMODYNAMIC EFFECT CAUSED BY INTRATHECAL LOW DOSE ADMINISTRATION OF 0.5% AGAINST 0.75% HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LOWER LIMB SURGERY UNDER UNILATERAL SPINAL ANAESTHESIA
Description:
Background: Spinal anaesthesia has its unique place in modern anaesthetic practice.
In past, most of the surgeries, irrespective of the site of surgery, were performed in general anaesthesia but now in the modern anaesthetic field, spinal anaesthesia has markedly replaced general anaesthesia, specifically in obstetrics, lower limbs, and abdominal surgeries.
Methods: A total of 100 patients fit to undergo lower limb surgery between the ages of 20 to 70 years were included in the study.
50 patients were in 0.
5% hyperbaric bupivacaine (Group A) while 50 patients were in the 0.
75% hyperbaric bupivacaine group (Group B).
Patients with a history of allergies to local anaesthetics, ischemic heart disease and contraindications to spinal anaesthesia were excluded.
At the end of the injection, the patient was immediately laid down and tilted to 30 degrees lateral on the operative side for unilateral anaesthesia.
Mean arterial pressure at baseline, 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes was recorded by trainee anaesthesia.
A baseline was taken of mean arterial pressure measured 15 minutes before induction of spinal anaesthesia in a lying position.
Results: The mean baseline arterial pressure of patients in group A was 88.
72±1.
71 mmHg and in group B was 88.
94±1.
95 mmHg.
Mean arterial pressure MAP at 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes in both groups was as follows; 86.
22±2.
55 vs 81.
78±1.
52 mmHg, 83.
72±3.
36 vs 75.
84±1.
34 mmHg, 80.
02±3.
40 vs 70.
90±0.
97 mmHg and 77.
14±4.
24 vs 66.
06±1.
62 mmHg respectively (p-value <0.
05).
Conclusion: This study concluded that the hemodynamic parameters in terms of mean arterial pressure remained more stable by deviating less from the baseline value with the use of a low dose of 0.
5% hyperbaric bupivacaine instead of 0.
75% hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing lower limb surgery under unilateral spinal anaesthesia.
Related Results
Enhancement of Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Neostigmine and Clonidine on Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia
Enhancement of Analgesic Effect of Intrathecal Neostigmine and Clonidine on Bupivacaine Spinal Anesthesia
Background and Objectives
Intrathecal administration of neostigmine has been shown to produce analgesia in both animals and humans. The concurrent administration ...
To compare the efficacy of intrathecal 0.75% heavy ropivacaine and 0.5% heavy bupivacaine for lower abdominal and lower limb surgery
To compare the efficacy of intrathecal 0.75% heavy ropivacaine and 0.5% heavy bupivacaine for lower abdominal and lower limb surgery
Background: Spinal anesthesia is the most popular regional anesthesia technique for lower limb and lower abdominal surgery. Bupivacaine 0.5% heavy is commonly used for intrathecal ...
To compare the efficacy of intrathecal 0.75% heavy ropivacaine and 0.5% heavy bupivacaine for lower abdominal and lower limb surgery
To compare the efficacy of intrathecal 0.75% heavy ropivacaine and 0.5% heavy bupivacaine for lower abdominal and lower limb surgery
Background: Spinal anesthesia is the most popular regional anesthesia technique for lower limb and lower abdominal surgery. Bupivacaine 0.5% heavy is commonly used for intrathecal ...
Comparison of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and intrathecal fentanyl as an adjuvant to bupivacaine during spinal anaesthesia for lower limb orthopedic surgery
Comparison of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and intrathecal fentanyl as an adjuvant to bupivacaine during spinal anaesthesia for lower limb orthopedic surgery
Background: In this study, we have compared the addition of fentanyl 25 mcg and dexmedetomidine 5 mcg to 15 mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia separately for p...
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF INTRATHECAL MIDAZOLAM(1MG) AND FENTANYL(25 MICROGRAMS) AS ADDITIVES TO INTRATHECAL HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE 0.5%(15MG) IN SPINALANAESTHESIA
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF INTRATHECAL MIDAZOLAM(1MG) AND FENTANYL(25 MICROGRAMS) AS ADDITIVES TO INTRATHECAL HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE 0.5%(15MG) IN SPINALANAESTHESIA
Background: Various intrathecal additives are added to local anesthetics to increase the speed of onset, improve the quality, and prolong the
inuence of spinal anesthesia. Midazol...
Hypotension after unilateral versus bilateral spinal anaesthesia
Hypotension after unilateral versus bilateral spinal anaesthesia
BACKGROUND
Spinal anaesthesia is frequently used in surgical procedures involving the lower abdomen and extremities, however, the occurrence of hypotension remains a co...
Evaluation of low dose hyperbaric bupivacaine with or without fentanyl in perianal surgeries: A prospective randomized double blind trial
Evaluation of low dose hyperbaric bupivacaine with or without fentanyl in perianal surgeries: A prospective randomized double blind trial
Spinal anaesthesia should be ideal for perianal surgeries due to its quick onset, reliable anaesthesia with minimal supplies making it cost-effective technique with rapid turnover ...
Comparison of Mean Onset of Motor and Sensory Block of Isobaric Ropivacaine and Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Elective Caesarean Sections at Tertiary Care Hospital, Karachi.
Comparison of Mean Onset of Motor and Sensory Block of Isobaric Ropivacaine and Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Elective Caesarean Sections at Tertiary Care Hospital, Karachi.
Objective: To compare the mean onset time of motor and sensory block of Isobaric Ropivacaine and Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for elective caesarean sections at Tertiary Care Hospital, K...

