Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Epistemic Modality in Georgian

View through CrossRef
The epistemic modality consists of epistemic possibility and necessity. Particle “Unda” (must) is the main formative of the epistemic necessity. Originating from a notional verb, it still retains its verbal functions. In the conjugation of an object, “Unda” is the III person form. It means “wish”, “want”. However, in modern Georgian, it is a multifunctional particle, with the epistemic necessity being one of the meanings thereof. “Unda” is associated with a verb in the subjunctive mood and expresses the speaker’s opinion, evaluation and attitude to the reality, the speaker’s assumption, conviction or the lack thereof. The said modality expresses intellectual perception of the speaker. Sentence1.“ის ახლა სახლში უნდა იყოს” [is axla saxlshi unda ix’os] – He must be at home now. “Unda” (must) expresses the speaker’s certainty ensuing from the analytical assessment of reality. The sentence implies his belief that someone must be at home since it is the most logical possibility based on the fact that lights are on. 2. “მას კარგად უნდა გაეკეთებინა ეს საქმე” [mas k’argad unda gaek’etebina es sakme] – He must have done a good job of it. Here “Unda” implies that as far as I know him, his capabilities and sense of responsibility, I believe that he must have got on with the job well enough. So, the epistemic necessity is expressed by “Unda” modal particle and a verb in the subjunctive mood and implies a logical necessity based on the speaker’s belief. In the determination of the epistemic modality, not only the analysis of the modal particle and a verb matters but the definition of the semantic groups of the verbs involved in the pattern. The paper will contain the functional and semantic analysis of the patterns expressing the aepistemic necessity.
Vilnius University Press
Title: Epistemic Modality in Georgian
Description:
The epistemic modality consists of epistemic possibility and necessity.
Particle “Unda” (must) is the main formative of the epistemic necessity.
Originating from a notional verb, it still retains its verbal functions.
In the conjugation of an object, “Unda” is the III person form.
It means “wish”, “want”.
However, in modern Georgian, it is a multifunctional particle, with the epistemic necessity being one of the meanings thereof.
“Unda” is associated with a verb in the subjunctive mood and expresses the speaker’s opinion, evaluation and attitude to the reality, the speaker’s assumption, conviction or the lack thereof.
The said modality expresses intellectual perception of the speaker.
Sentence1.
“ის ახლა სახლში უნდა იყოს” [is axla saxlshi unda ix’os] – He must be at home now.
“Unda” (must) expresses the speaker’s certainty ensuing from the analytical assessment of reality.
The sentence implies his belief that someone must be at home since it is the most logical possibility based on the fact that lights are on.
2.
“მას კარგად უნდა გაეკეთებინა ეს საქმე” [mas k’argad unda gaek’etebina es sakme] – He must have done a good job of it.
Here “Unda” implies that as far as I know him, his capabilities and sense of responsibility, I believe that he must have got on with the job well enough.
So, the epistemic necessity is expressed by “Unda” modal particle and a verb in the subjunctive mood and implies a logical necessity based on the speaker’s belief.
In the determination of the epistemic modality, not only the analysis of the modal particle and a verb matters but the definition of the semantic groups of the verbs involved in the pattern.
The paper will contain the functional and semantic analysis of the patterns expressing the aepistemic necessity.

Related Results

Epistemic Injustice
Epistemic Injustice
The concept of epistemic injustice refers to the injustice that an individual suffers specifically in their capacity as a knower or epistemic agent – that is, as someone who produc...
An epistemic justice account of students’ experiences of feedback
An epistemic justice account of students’ experiences of feedback
I am a storyteller. I believe in the power of stories to share experiences and to elucidate thoughts and ideas and to help us to make sense of complex social practices. This thesis...
Some Issues of the Economic Aspect of the Georgian National Mentality
Some Issues of the Economic Aspect of the Georgian National Mentality
The national economic mentality, which was formed over the centuries under the influence of various factors, determines the nature of the nation's socio-economic rules and their en...
College Students’ Epistemic Cognition, Epistemic Emotion, and Engagement: A Mediation Analysis
College Students’ Epistemic Cognition, Epistemic Emotion, and Engagement: A Mediation Analysis
Abstract Background: The college students' engagement has attracted the attention of scholars from various countries because it can impact student’s learning performance, ...
Epistemic Injustice or Epistemic Oppression?
Epistemic Injustice or Epistemic Oppression?
The concepts of epistemic injustice and epistemic oppression both aim to track obstacles to epistemic agencyーi.e., forms of epistemic exclusionーthat are undue and persistent. Indee...
Epistemic Diversity and Deliberation
Epistemic Diversity and Deliberation
We live in uncertain times. In the midst of polarization, the rise of fake news and disinformation and with expert knowledge and scientific argumentation losing credibility in the ...
Temas Epistêmicos, não Epistêmicos no Ensino
Temas Epistêmicos, não Epistêmicos no Ensino
Resumo A Epistemologia da Ciência é um campo de estudo que permite analisar o desenvolvimento da ciência em uma postura dialética, que qualifica as questões internas à Ciência, rel...
Epistemic Injustice
Epistemic Injustice
<p>“Epistemic injustice” is a fairly new concept in philosophy, which, loosely speaking, describes a kind of injustice that occurs at the intersection of structures of the so...

Back to Top