Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Epistemic Modality in Georgian
View through CrossRef
The epistemic modality consists of epistemic possibility and necessity. Particle “Unda” (must) is the main formative of the epistemic necessity. Originating from a notional verb, it still retains its verbal functions. In the conjugation of an object, “Unda” is the III person form. It means “wish”, “want”. However, in modern Georgian, it is a multifunctional particle, with the epistemic necessity being one of the meanings thereof. “Unda” is associated with a verb in the subjunctive mood and expresses the speaker’s opinion, evaluation and attitude to the reality, the speaker’s assumption, conviction or the lack thereof. The said modality expresses intellectual perception of the speaker. Sentence1.“ის ახლა სახლში უნდა იყოს” [is axla saxlshi unda ix’os] – He must be at home now. “Unda” (must) expresses the speaker’s certainty ensuing from the analytical assessment of reality. The sentence implies his belief that someone must be at home since it is the most logical possibility based on the fact that lights are on. 2. “მას კარგად უნდა გაეკეთებინა ეს საქმე” [mas k’argad unda gaek’etebina es sakme] – He must have done a good job of it. Here “Unda” implies that as far as I know him, his capabilities and sense of responsibility, I believe that he must have got on with the job well enough. So, the epistemic necessity is expressed by “Unda” modal particle and a verb in the subjunctive mood and implies a logical necessity based on the speaker’s belief. In the determination of the epistemic modality, not only the analysis of the modal particle and a verb matters but the definition of the semantic groups of the verbs involved in the pattern. The paper will contain the functional and semantic analysis of the patterns expressing the aepistemic necessity.
Title: Epistemic Modality in Georgian
Description:
The epistemic modality consists of epistemic possibility and necessity.
Particle “Unda” (must) is the main formative of the epistemic necessity.
Originating from a notional verb, it still retains its verbal functions.
In the conjugation of an object, “Unda” is the III person form.
It means “wish”, “want”.
However, in modern Georgian, it is a multifunctional particle, with the epistemic necessity being one of the meanings thereof.
“Unda” is associated with a verb in the subjunctive mood and expresses the speaker’s opinion, evaluation and attitude to the reality, the speaker’s assumption, conviction or the lack thereof.
The said modality expresses intellectual perception of the speaker.
Sentence1.
“ის ახლა სახლში უნდა იყოს” [is axla saxlshi unda ix’os] – He must be at home now.
“Unda” (must) expresses the speaker’s certainty ensuing from the analytical assessment of reality.
The sentence implies his belief that someone must be at home since it is the most logical possibility based on the fact that lights are on.
2.
“მას კარგად უნდა გაეკეთებინა ეს საქმე” [mas k’argad unda gaek’etebina es sakme] – He must have done a good job of it.
Here “Unda” implies that as far as I know him, his capabilities and sense of responsibility, I believe that he must have got on with the job well enough.
So, the epistemic necessity is expressed by “Unda” modal particle and a verb in the subjunctive mood and implies a logical necessity based on the speaker’s belief.
In the determination of the epistemic modality, not only the analysis of the modal particle and a verb matters but the definition of the semantic groups of the verbs involved in the pattern.
The paper will contain the functional and semantic analysis of the patterns expressing the aepistemic necessity.
Related Results
College Students’ Epistemic Cognition, Epistemic Emotion, and Engagement: A Mediation Analysis
College Students’ Epistemic Cognition, Epistemic Emotion, and Engagement: A Mediation Analysis
Abstract
Background:
The college students' engagement has attracted the attention of scholars from various countries because it can impact student’s learning performance, ...
Some Issues of the Economic Aspect of the Georgian National Mentality
Some Issues of the Economic Aspect of the Georgian National Mentality
The national economic mentality, which was formed over the centuries under the influence of various factors, determines the nature of the nation's socio-economic rules and their en...
Epistemic Injustice or Epistemic Oppression?
Epistemic Injustice or Epistemic Oppression?
The concepts of epistemic injustice and epistemic oppression both aim to track obstacles to epistemic agencyーi.e., forms of epistemic exclusionーthat are undue and persistent. Indee...
Temas Epistêmicos, não Epistêmicos no Ensino
Temas Epistêmicos, não Epistêmicos no Ensino
Resumo
A Epistemologia da Ciência é um campo de estudo que permite analisar o desenvolvimento da ciência em uma postura dialética, que qualifica as questões internas à Ciência, rel...
Epistemic Injustice
Epistemic Injustice
<p>“Epistemic injustice” is a fairly new concept in philosophy, which, loosely speaking, describes a kind of injustice that occurs at the intersection of structures of the so...
The Epistemic Innocence of Irrational Beliefs
The Epistemic Innocence of Irrational Beliefs
Abstract
Ideally, we would have beliefs that satisfy norms of truth and rationality, as well as fostering the acquisition, retention and use of other relevant inform...
A Pragmatic Analysis Of The Pedagogical Implications Of The Use Of English Epistemic Modality Written Literary Discourse
A Pragmatic Analysis Of The Pedagogical Implications Of The Use Of English Epistemic Modality Written Literary Discourse
Abstract : This is a pragmatic study of the use of the items of epistemic modality in a literary discourse with the main aims to identify, analyze and describe the ways the items o...
CONTEMPORARY AZERBAIJANI–GEORGIAN LITERARY RELATIONS: LEILA ERADZE AND DILARA ALIYEVA
CONTEMPORARY AZERBAIJANI–GEORGIAN LITERARY RELATIONS: LEILA ERADZE AND DILARA ALIYEVA
Beginning from the mid-twentieth century, the literary friendship between Azerbaijan and Georgia – particularly in the field of poetry – entered a new stage within the framework of...

