Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Optimization of grinding and distillation parameters affecting yield and composition of essential oils from the hybrid Eucalyptus grandis × E. camaldulensis (clone 2414)

View through CrossRef
This study examines how grinding and distillation duration affect the yield and composition of essential oils (EOs) from the natural hybrid Eucalyptus grandis × E. camaldulensis (clone 2414) and its parental species. Hydrodistillation was performed for 2–4 h on ground and whole leaves. Grinding increased yield by 20–25 %, and the optimum extraction time was 3 h. Yields ranged from 1.5 % (E. grandis) to 2.3 % (E. camaldulensis), with 1,8-cineole (42–61 %) as the main constituent. The hybrid exhibited a stable and distinctive chemical profile rich in oxygenated monoterpenes, demonstrating its industrial potential. Leaves were subjected to hydrodistillation using a Clevenger type apparatus under two conditions: ground versus whole leaves, and varying distillation times (2, 3, and 4 hours). EO yields were calculated relative to dry leaf mass, and the chemical profile was determined by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS). Results revealed that grinding significantly enhanced oil recovery, with ground leaves yielding up to 20–25% more oil compared to whole leaves. Distillation time strongly influenced EO output, with an optimal recovery observed at 3 hours; beyond this, additional distillation produced negligible increases. Overall yields ranged from 1.5% (E. grandis) to 2.1% (E. camaldulensis), while clone 2414 consistently displayed intermediate productivity (≈1.8%) that improved under optimized grinding and distillation conditions. GC–MS analysis confirmed 1,8 cineole as the dominant constituent (42–61%), accompanied by α-pinene, p-cymene, and limonene in variable proportions. Notably, the hybrid exhibited a distinctive chemical fingerprint enriched in oxygenated monoterpenes compared with its parents. These findings demonstrate that essential oil yield and composition are strongly influenced by both genetic background and processing variables. Clone 2414 consistently delivered stable and enhanced oil profiles under optimized conditions, highlighting its value as a versatile resource for industrial essential oil production.
Title: Optimization of grinding and distillation parameters affecting yield and composition of essential oils from the hybrid Eucalyptus grandis × E. camaldulensis (clone 2414)
Description:
This study examines how grinding and distillation duration affect the yield and composition of essential oils (EOs) from the natural hybrid Eucalyptus grandis × E.
camaldulensis (clone 2414) and its parental species.
Hydrodistillation was performed for 2–4 h on ground and whole leaves.
Grinding increased yield by 20–25 %, and the optimum extraction time was 3 h.
Yields ranged from 1.
5 % (E.
grandis) to 2.
3 % (E.
camaldulensis), with 1,8-cineole (42–61 %) as the main constituent.
The hybrid exhibited a stable and distinctive chemical profile rich in oxygenated monoterpenes, demonstrating its industrial potential.
Leaves were subjected to hydrodistillation using a Clevenger type apparatus under two conditions: ground versus whole leaves, and varying distillation times (2, 3, and 4 hours).
EO yields were calculated relative to dry leaf mass, and the chemical profile was determined by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS).
Results revealed that grinding significantly enhanced oil recovery, with ground leaves yielding up to 20–25% more oil compared to whole leaves.
Distillation time strongly influenced EO output, with an optimal recovery observed at 3 hours; beyond this, additional distillation produced negligible increases.
Overall yields ranged from 1.
5% (E.
grandis) to 2.
1% (E.
camaldulensis), while clone 2414 consistently displayed intermediate productivity (≈1.
8%) that improved under optimized grinding and distillation conditions.
GC–MS analysis confirmed 1,8 cineole as the dominant constituent (42–61%), accompanied by α-pinene, p-cymene, and limonene in variable proportions.
Notably, the hybrid exhibited a distinctive chemical fingerprint enriched in oxygenated monoterpenes compared with its parents.
These findings demonstrate that essential oil yield and composition are strongly influenced by both genetic background and processing variables.
Clone 2414 consistently delivered stable and enhanced oil profiles under optimized conditions, highlighting its value as a versatile resource for industrial essential oil production.

Related Results

Growth and Yield of Maize in Eucalyptus Tree Alley Cropping Agroforestry Practice in Kafa Zone, Ethiopia
Growth and Yield of Maize in Eucalyptus Tree Alley Cropping Agroforestry Practice in Kafa Zone, Ethiopia
Abstract Background and Objective: Recently, the agenda of Eucalyptus has been debatable because of its both positive and negative arguments. And different research results...
Towards a Better Understanding of the Rail Grinding Mechanism
Towards a Better Understanding of the Rail Grinding Mechanism
Rail grinding continues to be one of the most effective techniques for extending rail life, improving wheel/rail contact behavior, and reducing the overall cost of track maintenanc...
Theoretical modeling and experimental study on grinding force of straight groove structured grinding wheel
Theoretical modeling and experimental study on grinding force of straight groove structured grinding wheel
Abstract Structured grinding wheel has obvious advantages in reducing grinding force, and the structural parameters of grinding wheel have important influence on the reduct...
Antifungal, Antibacterial and Phytotoxic Activity of Essential Oil from Leaves of Eucalyptus camaldulensis
Antifungal, Antibacterial and Phytotoxic Activity of Essential Oil from Leaves of Eucalyptus camaldulensis
The objective of our study is to use the essential oil from the leaves of the plant Eucalyptus camaldulensis, which has been extracted by the hydrodistillation method as pathogenic...

Back to Top