Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Presidential Threshold Polemic in the 2019 Election and Before the 2024 Election Contest in Indonesia
View through CrossRef
The application of the presidential threshold in the presidential nomination election in Indonesia gave rise to various controversies and became a topic of discussion in the country's political system. This research wants to see the presidential threshold polemic in the 2019 election and before the 2024 election contestation in Indonesia. The type of research used is normative legal research. The findings in the 2019 election of the presidential threshold polemic that occurred were a number of political parties objecting to a high threshold, restrictions on the freedom of the people/the best sons and daughters who wanted to advance in the presidential election, the public were given choices that were not varied, weakened the presidential system and contradicted the 1945 Constitution Then the polemic leading up to the 2024 election, namely: elite candidates dominating, alternative candidates are limited, consideration of the Constitutional Court is problematic, article 222 of the law is contrary to article 6A (2) of the 1945 Constitution and democratic space is now limited.
Title: Presidential Threshold Polemic in the 2019 Election and Before the 2024 Election Contest in Indonesia
Description:
The application of the presidential threshold in the presidential nomination election in Indonesia gave rise to various controversies and became a topic of discussion in the country's political system.
This research wants to see the presidential threshold polemic in the 2019 election and before the 2024 election contestation in Indonesia.
The type of research used is normative legal research.
The findings in the 2019 election of the presidential threshold polemic that occurred were a number of political parties objecting to a high threshold, restrictions on the freedom of the people/the best sons and daughters who wanted to advance in the presidential election, the public were given choices that were not varied, weakened the presidential system and contradicted the 1945 Constitution Then the polemic leading up to the 2024 election, namely: elite candidates dominating, alternative candidates are limited, consideration of the Constitutional Court is problematic, article 222 of the law is contrary to article 6A (2) of the 1945 Constitution and democratic space is now limited.
Related Results
The Implementation of Good Governance In The Presidential Election In Indonesia
The Implementation of Good Governance In The Presidential Election In Indonesia
The 2019 presidential and vice presidential elections in Indonesia had complicated issues, including broken ballots, multiple voter lists, not registered as permanent voters, polit...
Politik Hukum Presidential Threshold 20% Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017
Politik Hukum Presidential Threshold 20% Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017
Presidential threshold 20% pada awalnya hadir sebagai bentuk untuk memperkuat sistem presidensial. Desain konstitusional presidential threshold merupakan ketentuan tambahan mengena...
PROBLEMATIKA KONSTITUSIONALITAS PRESIDENTIAL THRESHOLD DI INDONESIA
PROBLEMATIKA KONSTITUSIONALITAS PRESIDENTIAL THRESHOLD DI INDONESIA
Abstrak
Presidential threshold terus menjadi perdebatan di kalangan masyarakat, aturan yang dinilai merugikan masyarakat dan partai politik ini terus di uji konstitusionalitasnya d...
DAMPAK TEKNOLOGI TERHADAP PROSES BELAJAR MENGAJAR
DAMPAK TEKNOLOGI TERHADAP PROSES BELAJAR MENGAJAR
DAFTAR PUSTAKAAditama, M. H. R., & Selfiardy, S. (2022). Kehidupan Mahasiswa Kuliah Sambil Bekerja di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Kidspedia: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 3(...
Tinjauan Kritis Penerapaan Presidential Threshold Pada Pemilihan Umum Serentak
Tinjauan Kritis Penerapaan Presidential Threshold Pada Pemilihan Umum Serentak
The Presidential Threshold was applied in the election of president and vice president in Indonesia in the 2004 election. The implementation of the Presidential Threshold began dur...
Judicial Restraint Law Politics of the Constitutional Court Against Parliamentary Threshold: A Comparison of Indonesia and Philippines
Judicial Restraint Law Politics of the Constitutional Court Against Parliamentary Threshold: A Comparison of Indonesia and Philippines
ABSTRACT
The Purpose of this Research is to examine 1) Legal construction of the Judicial Review of Parliamentary Threshold No. 44/PUUXV/2017 and No. 62/PUU-XXII/2024 on Judicial R...
The Role of the General Election Commission (KPU) of Karanganyar in Increasing Voter Participation in the 2024 Presidential and Vice Presidential Elections and Legislative Elections
The Role of the General Election Commission (KPU) of Karanganyar in Increasing Voter Participation in the 2024 Presidential and Vice Presidential Elections and Legislative Elections
The General Election Commission (KPU) as one of the organizers of the general election, has strategic and tactical duties. This is in accordance with Article 2 of Law number 7 of 2...
ELECTION CAMPAIGN: DEFINITION AND TEMPORAL BOUNDARIES
ELECTION CAMPAIGN: DEFINITION AND TEMPORAL BOUNDARIES
The subject. Detection of the essence of electoral process, the election campaign and their influence on the temporal component of the electoral process is the subject of this publ...

