Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Berkeley on Perception
View through CrossRef
Abstract
This chapter interprets Berkeley’s theory of visual perception as more similar to contemporary constructivist models of vision than to the representationalist theories dominant among his predecessors. It also interprets Berkeley’s theory as addressing a problem of epistemic luck rather than perceptual error. Berkeley shows that the received representationalist solution to perceptual error—having ideas that are caused by and resemble external primary qualities—is neither necessary nor sufficient for veridically seeing those qualities. Berkeley’s constructivist approach to this problem of visual epistemic luck includes three unique features. First, visual processing has a linguistic structure. Second, visual experiences of the external world include normative contents. Third, natural laws ground both the linguistic structure of visual processing and the normative contents of visual experiences. It is argued that these features allow Berkeley to overcome both perceptual error and visual epistemic luck.
Title: Berkeley on Perception
Description:
Abstract
This chapter interprets Berkeley’s theory of visual perception as more similar to contemporary constructivist models of vision than to the representationalist theories dominant among his predecessors.
It also interprets Berkeley’s theory as addressing a problem of epistemic luck rather than perceptual error.
Berkeley shows that the received representationalist solution to perceptual error—having ideas that are caused by and resemble external primary qualities—is neither necessary nor sufficient for veridically seeing those qualities.
Berkeley’s constructivist approach to this problem of visual epistemic luck includes three unique features.
First, visual processing has a linguistic structure.
Second, visual experiences of the external world include normative contents.
Third, natural laws ground both the linguistic structure of visual processing and the normative contents of visual experiences.
It is argued that these features allow Berkeley to overcome both perceptual error and visual epistemic luck.
Related Results
A Metaphysics for the Mob
A Metaphysics for the Mob
AbstractGeorge Berkeley notoriously claimed that his immaterialist metaphysics was not only consistent with common sense, but that it was also integral to its defense. This book ar...
Berkeley and Sensible Things
Berkeley and Sensible Things
This paper aims to re-reading Berkeley and reposition his philosophy of knowledge between the claims of adherents of idealism or immaterialism that so far have been labeled by inte...
Berkeley and Reid
Berkeley and Reid
Abstract
Reid reacted strongly to Berkeley’s philosophy. He depicts Berkeley as the exemplar of the theory on which ideas are the immediate objects of mental activit...
WHITEHEAD, BERKELEY, AND REALISM
WHITEHEAD, BERKELEY, AND REALISM
This paper examines the shifting interpretations of George Berkeley’s philosophy in early 20th-century British realism, contrasting the Cantabrigian reading of Moore and Russell wi...
Berkeley and Kant
Berkeley and Kant
Abstract
This chapter surveys some of the most important issues concerning Kant’s relation to Berkeley. Early critics of the first edition of Critique of Pure Reason...
Berkeley and Mathematics
Berkeley and Mathematics
Abstract
This chapter investigates Berkeley’s approach to mathematics. The first section connects Berkeley’s philosophical understanding of mathematics to his anti-a...
Berkeley, George (1685–1753)
Berkeley, George (1685–1753)
George Berkeley, who was born in Ireland and who eventually became Bishop of Cloyne, is best known for three works that he published while still very young: An Essay towards a New ...
Relocating Romare Bearden’s Berkeley
Relocating Romare Bearden’s Berkeley
In 1972, the black artist and writer Romare Bearden traveled from his home in New York to spend ten days in the capital of counterculture in Berkeley, California. He visited on an ...

