Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Berkeley and Edwards
View through CrossRef
Abstract
Berkeley’s immaterialism was not the only form of immaterialism on offer in the early modern period. In colonial America, Edwards, the Puritan preacher, theologian, and philosopher, put forward his own version of immaterialism. Edwards’s version of immaterialism, which was arrived at independently of Berkeley’s, is supposed to share many of its advantages. However, the line of thought that led Edwards to immaterialism ultimately also led him to deny the substantiality and causal power of created minds—something Berkeley was determined to avoid, at all costs. Thus, comparing Edwards’s view to Berkeley’s helps us better understand the logic of immaterialism. It also helps emphasize the importance of Berkeley’s claim that we have experience of an ongoing self, in addition to our experience of our ideas and volitions.
Title: Berkeley and Edwards
Description:
Abstract
Berkeley’s immaterialism was not the only form of immaterialism on offer in the early modern period.
In colonial America, Edwards, the Puritan preacher, theologian, and philosopher, put forward his own version of immaterialism.
Edwards’s version of immaterialism, which was arrived at independently of Berkeley’s, is supposed to share many of its advantages.
However, the line of thought that led Edwards to immaterialism ultimately also led him to deny the substantiality and causal power of created minds—something Berkeley was determined to avoid, at all costs.
Thus, comparing Edwards’s view to Berkeley’s helps us better understand the logic of immaterialism.
It also helps emphasize the importance of Berkeley’s claim that we have experience of an ongoing self, in addition to our experience of our ideas and volitions.
Related Results
Born To Die: Lana Del Rey, Beauty Queen or Gothic Princess?
Born To Die: Lana Del Rey, Beauty Queen or Gothic Princess?
Closer examination of contemporary art forms including music videos in addition to the Gothic’s literature legacy is essential, “as it is virtually impossible to ignore the relatio...
A Metaphysics for the Mob
A Metaphysics for the Mob
AbstractGeorge Berkeley notoriously claimed that his immaterialist metaphysics was not only consistent with common sense, but that it was also integral to its defense. This book ar...
Berkeley and Sensible Things
Berkeley and Sensible Things
This paper aims to re-reading Berkeley and reposition his philosophy of knowledge between the claims of adherents of idealism or immaterialism that so far have been labeled by inte...
The Oxford Handbook of Jonathan Edwards
The Oxford Handbook of Jonathan Edwards
Abstract
The Oxford Handbook of Jonathan Edwards offers a state-of-the-art summary of scholarship on Edwards by a diverse, international, and interdisciplinary group...
Berkeley and Reid
Berkeley and Reid
Abstract
Reid reacted strongly to Berkeley’s philosophy. He depicts Berkeley as the exemplar of the theory on which ideas are the immediate objects of mental activit...
Doppler Echocardiographic Assessment of Normally Functioning Starr-Edwards, Carbomedics and Carpentier-Edwards Valves in Aortic Position
Doppler Echocardiographic Assessment of Normally Functioning Starr-Edwards, Carbomedics and Carpentier-Edwards Valves in Aortic Position
Doppler echocardiography was performed in 168 normally functioning aortic prostheses to determine acceptable pressure gradients across the commonly used valves and to establish the...
Berkeley and Kant
Berkeley and Kant
Abstract
This chapter surveys some of the most important issues concerning Kant’s relation to Berkeley. Early critics of the first edition of Critique of Pure Reason...
WHITEHEAD, BERKELEY, AND REALISM
WHITEHEAD, BERKELEY, AND REALISM
This paper examines the shifting interpretations of George Berkeley’s philosophy in early 20th-century British realism, contrasting the Cantabrigian reading of Moore and Russell wi...

