Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Does Surface Enamel Composition and Characteristics Vary With Inter Proximal Enamel Reduction ?

View through CrossRef
Abstract Objective :This study aimed to evaluate the chemical composition of the proximal enamel surface and the surface characteristics subjected to different extents of Inter- proximal reduction(IPR) in a clinical setting Materials and methods:Premolars of orthodontic patients which were designated for extraction were subjected to .2mm,.3 mm and .5 mm of IPR. After one month the teeth were extracted and the teeth were subjected to Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and Energy Dispersive X ray Spectroscopy (EDX). Results: Calcium Phosphorous stoichiometric ratios for all the four groups assessed with EDX was compared using Mann Whitney U test (0.86, 0.76, 0.56, 0.64 respectively) and it was statistically insignificant (p=0.163). The SEM images of the three experimental groups (taken at magnification of 500X and 2000X showed that the enamel surfaces were irregular and rough compared to the honey comb appearance of the unstripped group. Small areas of erosion of enamel surface were seen in Group I (0.2mm) under 2000X magnification compared to Group IV (control) which showed typical arrangement of enamel rods in alternating orientation Conclusions:On analyzing the surface characteristics of enamel using SEM between the stripped and unstripped surfaces, there were irregularities and roughness seen in stripped surface whereas honey comb pattern was observed in unstripped enamel surfaces. The elements found in unstripped and stripped enamel surfaces were calcium, phosphorous, carbon, oxygen and nitrogen. Although the calcium and phosphorus were high in the 0.5mm IPR group, the difference between stripped and unstripped enamel surfaces were statistically not significant. Clinical relevance: IPR is a popular method of gaining space particularly in recent times.There have been concerns that IPR can remove the superfical mineral rich layer making the deeper layers more susceptible to carious attack. No study has studied the mineral content in different layers of enamel in response to IPR .The results of this study strengthens the validity of the clinical protocol employed.
Title: Does Surface Enamel Composition and Characteristics Vary With Inter Proximal Enamel Reduction ?
Description:
Abstract Objective :This study aimed to evaluate the chemical composition of the proximal enamel surface and the surface characteristics subjected to different extents of Inter- proximal reduction(IPR) in a clinical setting Materials and methods:Premolars of orthodontic patients which were designated for extraction were subjected to .
2mm,.
3 mm and .
5 mm of IPR.
After one month the teeth were extracted and the teeth were subjected to Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) and Energy Dispersive X ray Spectroscopy (EDX).
Results: Calcium Phosphorous stoichiometric ratios for all the four groups assessed with EDX was compared using Mann Whitney U test (0.
86, 0.
76, 0.
56, 0.
64 respectively) and it was statistically insignificant (p=0.
163).
The SEM images of the three experimental groups (taken at magnification of 500X and 2000X showed that the enamel surfaces were irregular and rough compared to the honey comb appearance of the unstripped group.
Small areas of erosion of enamel surface were seen in Group I (0.
2mm) under 2000X magnification compared to Group IV (control) which showed typical arrangement of enamel rods in alternating orientation Conclusions:On analyzing the surface characteristics of enamel using SEM between the stripped and unstripped surfaces, there were irregularities and roughness seen in stripped surface whereas honey comb pattern was observed in unstripped enamel surfaces.
The elements found in unstripped and stripped enamel surfaces were calcium, phosphorous, carbon, oxygen and nitrogen.
Although the calcium and phosphorus were high in the 0.
5mm IPR group, the difference between stripped and unstripped enamel surfaces were statistically not significant.
Clinical relevance: IPR is a popular method of gaining space particularly in recent times.
There have been concerns that IPR can remove the superfical mineral rich layer making the deeper layers more susceptible to carious attack.
No study has studied the mineral content in different layers of enamel in response to IPR .
The results of this study strengthens the validity of the clinical protocol employed.

Related Results

Posteruptive Loss of Enamel Proteins Concurs with Gain in Enamel Hardness
Posteruptive Loss of Enamel Proteins Concurs with Gain in Enamel Hardness
ABSTRACT Tooth enamel maturation requires the removal of proteins from the mineralizing enamel matrix to allow for crystallite growth until full hardness is reached...
Restoration of human tooth enamel
Restoration of human tooth enamel
AbstractHuman tooth enamel, consisting of hydroxyapatite nanocrystals (∼85–88 vol%), proteins (∼2‐3 vol%), and requisite water (∼10–12 vol%), is 1–3 mm thick at the outer layer of ...
249 Is Stool DNA Test More Specific for Proximal or Distal Neoplasia?
249 Is Stool DNA Test More Specific for Proximal or Distal Neoplasia?
INTRODUCTION: A handful of studies evaluated stool DNA test as a screening method but there is little to no data on the location of the “positive findings” detected on ...
The Amount of Proximal Lumbar Lordosis Is Related to Pelvic Incidence
The Amount of Proximal Lumbar Lordosis Is Related to Pelvic Incidence
Abstract Background Given that the pelvis is the pedestal on which the spine lies, its morphology has been observed to be associated with specifi...
Ectopic Tooth Enamel. An SEM Study of the Structure of Enamel in Enamel Pearls
Ectopic Tooth Enamel. An SEM Study of the Structure of Enamel in Enamel Pearls
Eighteen human molars with enamel pearls ranging in diameter from 0.8 to 2.7 mm were sectioned, acid-etched, and processed for SEM observation. In addition to pearl enamel, the spe...

Back to Top