Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparison of Enamel Surface Roughness after Orthodontic Brackets Debonding and Surface Polishing with Restorative and Orthodontic Composites

View through CrossRef
Introduction: Emergence of superficial enamel roughness following orthodontic bracket debonding leads to the accumulation of microbial plaque, resulting in the development of dental caries and compromising the aesthetics and health of the tooth enamel. The objective of this current study is to investigate the Enamel Surface Roughness after Orthodontic Brackets Debonding and Surface Polishing with Restorative and Orthodontic Composites. Materials and Methods: In the present study, three types of composites were used for bonding metal orthodontic brackets. The samples were randomly divided into three cure groups: XT, GC, and SHOFU. Subsequently, the brackets were debonded, and the target surfaces were treated using a carbide bur for one minute by an operator to remove adhesive remnants and be prepared for bonding. The superficial enamel roughness was then examined. Furthermore, the samples were evaluated for the Adhesive Remnant Index before and after adhesive removal and enamel surface preparation. The data were analyzed using ANOVA test and SPSS software version 22. Results: The results indicated that there was no significant difference in surface roughness among the tested groups. However, a significant difference was observed between the surface roughness of the experimental groups and the healthy enamel surface (P<0.05). Moreover, among the different experimental groups, there were statistically significant differences in the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) after bracket debonding, before and after enamel surface cleaning. These differences were primarily due to distinctions between the XT and SHOFU groups, as well as between the GC and SHOFU groups. However, there was no significant difference in ARI before and after enamel surface cleaning between the XT and GC groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: The results of the present study indicate a desirable and acceptable performance of the composite material. It is suggested that future studies focus on a comparative investigation of several cleaning and surface preparation systems.
Title: Comparison of Enamel Surface Roughness after Orthodontic Brackets Debonding and Surface Polishing with Restorative and Orthodontic Composites
Description:
Introduction: Emergence of superficial enamel roughness following orthodontic bracket debonding leads to the accumulation of microbial plaque, resulting in the development of dental caries and compromising the aesthetics and health of the tooth enamel.
The objective of this current study is to investigate the Enamel Surface Roughness after Orthodontic Brackets Debonding and Surface Polishing with Restorative and Orthodontic Composites.
Materials and Methods: In the present study, three types of composites were used for bonding metal orthodontic brackets.
The samples were randomly divided into three cure groups: XT, GC, and SHOFU.
Subsequently, the brackets were debonded, and the target surfaces were treated using a carbide bur for one minute by an operator to remove adhesive remnants and be prepared for bonding.
The superficial enamel roughness was then examined.
Furthermore, the samples were evaluated for the Adhesive Remnant Index before and after adhesive removal and enamel surface preparation.
The data were analyzed using ANOVA test and SPSS software version 22.
Results: The results indicated that there was no significant difference in surface roughness among the tested groups.
However, a significant difference was observed between the surface roughness of the experimental groups and the healthy enamel surface (P<0.
05).
Moreover, among the different experimental groups, there were statistically significant differences in the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) after bracket debonding, before and after enamel surface cleaning.
These differences were primarily due to distinctions between the XT and SHOFU groups, as well as between the GC and SHOFU groups.
However, there was no significant difference in ARI before and after enamel surface cleaning between the XT and GC groups (P>0.
05).
Conclusion: The results of the present study indicate a desirable and acceptable performance of the composite material.
It is suggested that future studies focus on a comparative investigation of several cleaning and surface preparation systems.

Related Results

Recent Patents for Optical Component Polishing Technology
Recent Patents for Optical Component Polishing Technology
Background: Fluid jet polishing, Airbag polishing, Magnetorheological polishing, and Ion beam polishing are all emerging polishing technologies commonly used for processing optical...
Enamel surface roughness assessment after debonding, employing three different removal methods.
Enamel surface roughness assessment after debonding, employing three different removal methods.
The search for an efficient and safe resin removal method after debonding has resulted in the introduction of a wide array of instruments and techniques. In the previously, safety ...
Correlation of enamel surface roughness, hardness, and demineralization following the use of orthodontic brackets
Correlation of enamel surface roughness, hardness, and demineralization following the use of orthodontic brackets
Abstract Objective This study aimed to assess the correlation among altered enamel surface roughness, micro-hardness, and demineralization depth follwing the use of orthod...
Comparison of active self-ligating brackets and conventional pre-adjusted brackets
Comparison of active self-ligating brackets and conventional pre-adjusted brackets
Abstract Background Active self-ligating brackets may be more efficient than conventional pre-adjusted brackets. ...
Comparative Study of Shear Bond Strength of Recycled Brackets using different Recycling Techniques – An in vitro study
Comparative Study of Shear Bond Strength of Recycled Brackets using different Recycling Techniques – An in vitro study
Introduction: The debonding of brackets is common in orthodontic practice. It may be due to bond failure or as a need for bracket repositioning. Typically practitioners shall disca...
Posteruptive Loss of Enamel Proteins Concurs with Gain in Enamel Hardness
Posteruptive Loss of Enamel Proteins Concurs with Gain in Enamel Hardness
ABSTRACT Tooth enamel maturation requires the removal of proteins from the mineralizing enamel matrix to allow for crystallite growth until full hardness is reached...
Evaluation of enamel surface integrity after orthodontic bracket debonding: comparison of three different system
Evaluation of enamel surface integrity after orthodontic bracket debonding: comparison of three different system
Abstract Objective This study aimed to evaluate enamel surface integrity and time consumed during residual cement removal after bracket debonding us...
Electrochemical Polishing of Tungsten: An Investigation of Critical Spatial Frequency and Ultimate Roughness
Electrochemical Polishing of Tungsten: An Investigation of Critical Spatial Frequency and Ultimate Roughness
Electrochemical polishing (ECP) offers incomparable advantages and great potential in metal polishing by surface errors correction. This paper systematically investigates the ultim...

Back to Top