Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparison of Enamel Surface Roughness after Orthodontic Brackets Debonding and Surface Polishing with Restorative and Orthodontic Composites
View through CrossRef
Introduction: Emergence of superficial enamel roughness following orthodontic bracket debonding leads to the accumulation of microbial plaque, resulting in the development of dental caries and compromising the aesthetics and health of the tooth enamel. The objective of this current study is to investigate the Enamel Surface Roughness after Orthodontic Brackets Debonding and Surface Polishing with Restorative and Orthodontic Composites. Materials and Methods: In the present study, three types of composites were used for bonding metal orthodontic brackets. The samples were randomly divided into three cure groups: XT, GC, and SHOFU. Subsequently, the brackets were debonded, and the target surfaces were treated using a carbide bur for one minute by an operator to remove adhesive remnants and be prepared for bonding. The superficial enamel roughness was then examined. Furthermore, the samples were evaluated for the Adhesive Remnant Index before and after adhesive removal and enamel surface preparation. The data were analyzed using ANOVA test and SPSS software version 22. Results: The results indicated that there was no significant difference in surface roughness among the tested groups. However, a significant difference was observed between the surface roughness of the experimental groups and the healthy enamel surface (P<0.05). Moreover, among the different experimental groups, there were statistically significant differences in the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) after bracket debonding, before and after enamel surface cleaning. These differences were primarily due to distinctions between the XT and SHOFU groups, as well as between the GC and SHOFU groups. However, there was no significant difference in ARI before and after enamel surface cleaning between the XT and GC groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: The results of the present study indicate a desirable and acceptable performance of the composite material. It is suggested that future studies focus on a comparative investigation of several cleaning and surface preparation systems.
Title: Comparison of Enamel Surface Roughness after Orthodontic Brackets Debonding and Surface Polishing with Restorative and Orthodontic Composites
Description:
Introduction: Emergence of superficial enamel roughness following orthodontic bracket debonding leads to the accumulation of microbial plaque, resulting in the development of dental caries and compromising the aesthetics and health of the tooth enamel.
The objective of this current study is to investigate the Enamel Surface Roughness after Orthodontic Brackets Debonding and Surface Polishing with Restorative and Orthodontic Composites.
Materials and Methods: In the present study, three types of composites were used for bonding metal orthodontic brackets.
The samples were randomly divided into three cure groups: XT, GC, and SHOFU.
Subsequently, the brackets were debonded, and the target surfaces were treated using a carbide bur for one minute by an operator to remove adhesive remnants and be prepared for bonding.
The superficial enamel roughness was then examined.
Furthermore, the samples were evaluated for the Adhesive Remnant Index before and after adhesive removal and enamel surface preparation.
The data were analyzed using ANOVA test and SPSS software version 22.
Results: The results indicated that there was no significant difference in surface roughness among the tested groups.
However, a significant difference was observed between the surface roughness of the experimental groups and the healthy enamel surface (P<0.
05).
Moreover, among the different experimental groups, there were statistically significant differences in the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI) after bracket debonding, before and after enamel surface cleaning.
These differences were primarily due to distinctions between the XT and SHOFU groups, as well as between the GC and SHOFU groups.
However, there was no significant difference in ARI before and after enamel surface cleaning between the XT and GC groups (P>0.
05).
Conclusion: The results of the present study indicate a desirable and acceptable performance of the composite material.
It is suggested that future studies focus on a comparative investigation of several cleaning and surface preparation systems.
Related Results
Recent Patents for Optical Component Polishing Technology
Recent Patents for Optical Component Polishing Technology
Background:
Fluid jet polishing, Airbag polishing, Magnetorheological polishing, and Ion beam polishing are all emerging polishing technologies commonly used for processing optical...
Enamel surface roughness assessment after debonding, employing three different removal methods.
Enamel surface roughness assessment after debonding, employing three different removal methods.
The search for an efficient and safe resin removal method after debonding has resulted in the introduction of a wide array of instruments and techniques. In the previously, safety ...
Correlation of enamel surface roughness, hardness, and demineralization following the use of orthodontic brackets
Correlation of enamel surface roughness, hardness, and demineralization following the use of orthodontic brackets
Abstract
Objective
This study aimed to assess the correlation among altered enamel surface roughness, micro-hardness, and demineralization depth follwing the use of orthod...
Influence of polishing systems on surface roughness of four resin composites subjected to thermocycling aging
Influence of polishing systems on surface roughness of four resin composites subjected to thermocycling aging
Background:
Surface smoothness considered to be a significant part of the appearance and success of the restorative materials. The aim of this study was to assess the i...
Comparison of active self-ligating brackets and conventional pre-adjusted brackets
Comparison of active self-ligating brackets and conventional pre-adjusted brackets
Abstract
Background
Active self-ligating brackets may be more efficient than conventional pre-adjusted brackets.
...
In Vitro Determination of Genotoxicity and Cytotoxicity Induced by Stainless Steel Brackets with and without Surface Coating in Cultures of Oral Mucosal Cells
In Vitro Determination of Genotoxicity and Cytotoxicity Induced by Stainless Steel Brackets with and without Surface Coating in Cultures of Oral Mucosal Cells
Abstract
PURPOSE: Orthodontics is a specialty of dentistry that uses a plethora of devices made from myriad materials to manage various malocclusions. As these orthodontic ...
Posteruptive Loss of Enamel Proteins Concurs with Gain in Enamel Hardness
Posteruptive Loss of Enamel Proteins Concurs with Gain in Enamel Hardness
ABSTRACT
Tooth enamel maturation requires the removal of proteins from the mineralizing enamel matrix to allow for crystallite growth until full hardness is reached...
Study on Polishing Characteristics of Pyramidal Structured Polishing Pad
Study on Polishing Characteristics of Pyramidal Structured Polishing Pad
We conducted a polishing test to clarify the change in polishing characteristics resulting from the wear of a pyramidal-structured polishing tool, and discuss the polishing mechani...

