Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

User Trust in BBS Comunities

View through CrossRef
The Bulletin Board System (BBS), when it first appeared in the middle 1970s, was essentially “a personal computer, not necessarily an expensive one, running inexpensive BBS software, plugged into an ordinary telephone line via a small electronic device called modem” (Rheingold, 1993). The networked computers used to create these parallel worlds and facilitate communication between human beings constitute the technical foundations of computer-mediated communication (CMC) (Nancy, 1998). CMC systems link people around the world into public discussions. While CMC can exist solely between two people or between one person and an anonymous group, increasingly, virtual communities of many people are being formed. With advent of the Internet, the World Wide Web (WWW) brought more new technologies to the BBS. Thousands of BBSs sprang up across the world. Many turned out tremendously successful and evolved into lively virtual communities. These communities provided forums with increasing importance for individuals and groups that share a professional interest or share common activities. Online BBS communities now play an important role in information dissemination and knowledge collaboration on the Internet. On one hand, online forums enable people to disseminate information in an extremely efficient way without geographical restriction. On the other hand, the freedom also comes with uncertainty. Any information can be released and the content is almost beyond control, or even unreliable. To understand the content and quality of the information in BBSs, we would split the task into two subjects: one is to assess the information sources; another is to assess the information providers, people themselves in the virtual communities. Most BBSs are anonymous, because people usually use a pseudonym rather than their real name when registering. A user does not need to provide real personal information to the system, either. Thus, how to assess the trust of the users in a BBS community and attract more trustful and worthy users to participate in the activities of the community have become crucial topics to establish a successful community. Two subjects are important for establishing user trust in a BBS community: First, a BBS system must be able to identify a user and provide efficient security protection for each user and his/her privacy. Second, the value and the trustworthiness of a user should be assessed according to that user’s behavior and contribution to the community in comparison to peers.
Title: User Trust in BBS Comunities
Description:
The Bulletin Board System (BBS), when it first appeared in the middle 1970s, was essentially “a personal computer, not necessarily an expensive one, running inexpensive BBS software, plugged into an ordinary telephone line via a small electronic device called modem” (Rheingold, 1993).
The networked computers used to create these parallel worlds and facilitate communication between human beings constitute the technical foundations of computer-mediated communication (CMC) (Nancy, 1998).
CMC systems link people around the world into public discussions.
While CMC can exist solely between two people or between one person and an anonymous group, increasingly, virtual communities of many people are being formed.
With advent of the Internet, the World Wide Web (WWW) brought more new technologies to the BBS.
Thousands of BBSs sprang up across the world.
Many turned out tremendously successful and evolved into lively virtual communities.
These communities provided forums with increasing importance for individuals and groups that share a professional interest or share common activities.
Online BBS communities now play an important role in information dissemination and knowledge collaboration on the Internet.
On one hand, online forums enable people to disseminate information in an extremely efficient way without geographical restriction.
On the other hand, the freedom also comes with uncertainty.
Any information can be released and the content is almost beyond control, or even unreliable.
To understand the content and quality of the information in BBSs, we would split the task into two subjects: one is to assess the information sources; another is to assess the information providers, people themselves in the virtual communities.
Most BBSs are anonymous, because people usually use a pseudonym rather than their real name when registering.
A user does not need to provide real personal information to the system, either.
Thus, how to assess the trust of the users in a BBS community and attract more trustful and worthy users to participate in the activities of the community have become crucial topics to establish a successful community.
Two subjects are important for establishing user trust in a BBS community: First, a BBS system must be able to identify a user and provide efficient security protection for each user and his/her privacy.
Second, the value and the trustworthiness of a user should be assessed according to that user’s behavior and contribution to the community in comparison to peers.

Related Results

Observed high incidence of buried bumper syndrome associated with Freka PEG tubes
Observed high incidence of buried bumper syndrome associated with Freka PEG tubes
Background Buried bumper syndrome (BBS) is an uncommon but significant complication of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG), which occurs due to overgrowth o...
Multimodal Emotion Recognition and Human Computer Interaction for AI-Driven Mental Health Support (Preprint)
Multimodal Emotion Recognition and Human Computer Interaction for AI-Driven Mental Health Support (Preprint)
BACKGROUND Mental health has become one of the most urgent global health issues of the twenty-first century. The World Health Organization (WHO) reports tha...
Autonomy on Trial
Autonomy on Trial
Photo by CHUTTERSNAP on Unsplash Abstract This paper critically examines how US bioethics and health law conceptualize patient autonomy, contrasting the rights-based, individualist...
Banking system trust, bank trust, and bank loyalty
Banking system trust, bank trust, and bank loyalty
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to test a model of banking system trust as an antecedent of bank trust and bank loyalty. Six determinants of trust and loya...
Bardet–Biedl syndrome in a Syrian adolescent: a rare case report
Bardet–Biedl syndrome in a Syrian adolescent: a rare case report
Introduction: Bardet–Biedl Syndrome (BBS) is a rare genetic disorder that affects multiple organs and presents with a variety of characteristics. It was found t...
Measuring trust in supply chain partners' relationships
Measuring trust in supply chain partners' relationships
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to develop a context dependent, multi perspective multilevel trust measurement instrument to measure supply chain members' trust.Design/methodol...
Molecular mechanisms and phenotypic diversity in Bardet-Biedl syndrome
Molecular mechanisms and phenotypic diversity in Bardet-Biedl syndrome
Ciliopathies are a group of rare diseases characterized by a wrong function or structure of the cilia. One of them is Bardet-Biedl syndrome, a multisystemic disease whose main symp...
Developmental appearance of peptide-binding sites in the small intestine of the neonatal piglet
Developmental appearance of peptide-binding sites in the small intestine of the neonatal piglet
The ontogeny of the expression of specific binding sites for bombesin (BBS), vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP), and gastrin in the neonatal pig was examined. Piglets were sac...

Back to Top