Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Clinical and genetic features of somatic mosaicism in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy

View through CrossRef
Purpose To analyse the clinical spectrum, genetic features, specific D4Z4 hypomethylation status and genotype–phenotype correlations for somatic mosaicism in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD). Methods This was a prospective, hospital-based, case–control, observational study of 35 participants with FSHD with somatic mosaicism recruited over 10 years, with 17 penetrant patients and 18 non-penetrant mutation carriers. This study also included a univariate comparison of 17 paired mosaic and non-mosaic patients with FSHD. Results Mosaic participants with FSHD varied in age of diagnosis (median 45; range 15–65 years), muscle strength (FSHD clinical score median 0; range 0–10 points), clinical severity (age-corrected clinical severity score (ACSS) median 0; range 0–467 points), D4Z4 repeats (median 3; range 2–5 units), mosaic proportion (median 55%; range 27%–72%) and D4Z4 methylation extent (median 49.82%; range 27.17%–64.51%). The genotypic severity scale and D4Z4 methylation extent were significantly associated with ACSS (p1=0.003; p2=0.002). Among the matched pairs, the 17 mosaic patients had shorter D4Z4 repeats, lower FSHD clinical scores and lower ACSS than non-mosaic patients. Additionally, 34 of 35 (97%) participants carried two mosaic arrays, while a single patient had three mosaic arrays (3%). Two cases also carried four-type non-mosaic arrays on chromosome 10 (translocation configuration). Conclusions Broadly, this large mosaic FSHD cohort exhibited significant clinical heterogeneity and relatively slight disease severity. Both genotypic severity scale and D4Z4 hypomethylation status served as modifiers of clinical phenotypes. Consistent with previous reports, mitotic interchromosomal/intrachromosomal gene conversion without crossover was here identified as a major genetic mechanism underlying mosaic FSHD.
Title: Clinical and genetic features of somatic mosaicism in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy
Description:
Purpose To analyse the clinical spectrum, genetic features, specific D4Z4 hypomethylation status and genotype–phenotype correlations for somatic mosaicism in facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD).
Methods This was a prospective, hospital-based, case–control, observational study of 35 participants with FSHD with somatic mosaicism recruited over 10 years, with 17 penetrant patients and 18 non-penetrant mutation carriers.
This study also included a univariate comparison of 17 paired mosaic and non-mosaic patients with FSHD.
Results Mosaic participants with FSHD varied in age of diagnosis (median 45; range 15–65 years), muscle strength (FSHD clinical score median 0; range 0–10 points), clinical severity (age-corrected clinical severity score (ACSS) median 0; range 0–467 points), D4Z4 repeats (median 3; range 2–5 units), mosaic proportion (median 55%; range 27%–72%) and D4Z4 methylation extent (median 49.
82%; range 27.
17%–64.
51%).
The genotypic severity scale and D4Z4 methylation extent were significantly associated with ACSS (p1=0.
003; p2=0.
002).
Among the matched pairs, the 17 mosaic patients had shorter D4Z4 repeats, lower FSHD clinical scores and lower ACSS than non-mosaic patients.
Additionally, 34 of 35 (97%) participants carried two mosaic arrays, while a single patient had three mosaic arrays (3%).
Two cases also carried four-type non-mosaic arrays on chromosome 10 (translocation configuration).
Conclusions Broadly, this large mosaic FSHD cohort exhibited significant clinical heterogeneity and relatively slight disease severity.
Both genotypic severity scale and D4Z4 hypomethylation status served as modifiers of clinical phenotypes.
Consistent with previous reports, mitotic interchromosomal/intrachromosomal gene conversion without crossover was here identified as a major genetic mechanism underlying mosaic FSHD.

Related Results

Categories of Cutaneous Mosaicism
Categories of Cutaneous Mosaicism
ABSTRACTIn this overview, the following 12 different categories of cutaneous mosaicism are considered: (1) Discrimination between monoallelic and biallelic mosaicism in autosomal d...
Clinico-pathological Diagnosis of Facioscapulohumeral Dystrophy in a 22-year-old Male
Clinico-pathological Diagnosis of Facioscapulohumeral Dystrophy in a 22-year-old Male
Background: Facioscapulohumeral dystrophy (FSHD) is a rare hereditary disease with a prevalence of 2.03–6.8 per 100,000 individuals. FSHD is the third most common type of muscular ...
A KRT6A Mutation p.Ile462Asn In A Chinese Family With Pachyonychia Congenita, And Identification of Maternal Mosaicism
A KRT6A Mutation p.Ile462Asn In A Chinese Family With Pachyonychia Congenita, And Identification of Maternal Mosaicism
Abstract Background: Pachyonychia congenita (PC, OMIM #167200, #167210, #615726, #615728, and #615735) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder caused by keratin gene mutation...
Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy: Genetics and Trials
Facioscapulohumeral Muscular Dystrophy: Genetics and Trials
A complex combination of molecular pathways and cell interactions causes facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD). Several new therapies pose a promising solution to this dise...
A KRT6A mutation p.Ile462Asn in a Chinese family with pachyonychia congenita, and identification of maternal mosaicism: a case report
A KRT6A mutation p.Ile462Asn in a Chinese family with pachyonychia congenita, and identification of maternal mosaicism: a case report
AbstractBackgroundPachyonychia congenita (PC, OMIM #167200, #167210, #615726, #615728, and #615735) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder caused by keratin gene mutations inKRT6A,K...
The adaptive potential of non-heritable somatic mutations
The adaptive potential of non-heritable somatic mutations
Abstract Non-heritable somatic mutations are typically associated with deleterious effects such as in cancer and senescence, so their role in adaptive evolution has...

Back to Top