Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

INTERPRETATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF NEW YORK CONVENTION IN PAKISTAN: A CRITICAL STUDY

View through CrossRef
Convention on the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards 1958 (New York Convention) aims to promote and regulate the out of the court settlement i.e. Arbitration and other methods of alternative dispute resolution. It regulates the relations between two parties when they are specifically involved in a contractual relationship and working transnationally and across the borders. The convention has undoubtedly created a great opportunity for multinational companies and international bodies including investors and enterprises to go for international agreements with a piece of mind that their rights will be taken care of and an award received by an overseas authority will be honored in all signatory states of the convention. Considering it an international opportunity Pakistan became signatory to the convention in 2005 and hence it became international obligation for the state of Pakistan to give effect the spirit and scope of convention in the legal system. It was initially incorporated through an ordinance in 2005 which after multiple renewals became act of the parliament in 2011. As convention is complete and exhaustive in nature and scope and it clearly states the grounds which can be used by competent authority of signatory states to refuse its implementation in a specific jurisdiction. The grounds provided by the convention have been construed and interpreted since ratification of the convention and this study critically analyzes the instances that how and when provisions of the convention have been interpreted by the courts of the land including apex court of the Land I.e. Supreme Court of Pakistan.
Society for Social Sciences and Research Association
Title: INTERPRETATION AND CONSTRUCTION OF NEW YORK CONVENTION IN PAKISTAN: A CRITICAL STUDY
Description:
Convention on the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards 1958 (New York Convention) aims to promote and regulate the out of the court settlement i.
e.
Arbitration and other methods of alternative dispute resolution.
It regulates the relations between two parties when they are specifically involved in a contractual relationship and working transnationally and across the borders.
The convention has undoubtedly created a great opportunity for multinational companies and international bodies including investors and enterprises to go for international agreements with a piece of mind that their rights will be taken care of and an award received by an overseas authority will be honored in all signatory states of the convention.
Considering it an international opportunity Pakistan became signatory to the convention in 2005 and hence it became international obligation for the state of Pakistan to give effect the spirit and scope of convention in the legal system.
It was initially incorporated through an ordinance in 2005 which after multiple renewals became act of the parliament in 2011.
As convention is complete and exhaustive in nature and scope and it clearly states the grounds which can be used by competent authority of signatory states to refuse its implementation in a specific jurisdiction.
The grounds provided by the convention have been construed and interpreted since ratification of the convention and this study critically analyzes the instances that how and when provisions of the convention have been interpreted by the courts of the land including apex court of the Land I.
e.
Supreme Court of Pakistan.

Related Results

Regina (Keyu) and Others v. Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Another
Regina (Keyu) and Others v. Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and Another
Relationship of international law and municipal law — Treaties — Effect in municipal law — European Convention on Human Rights, 1950 — Article 2 of Convention — Human Rights Act 19...
Why Do Indians Experience Less Happiness Than Pakistanis?
Why Do Indians Experience Less Happiness Than Pakistanis?
This study explores the enigma of happiness inequality between India and Pakistan, despite India’s economic prowess. Employing inequality regression models, the study pinpoints cru...
Guzzardi Case
Guzzardi Case
State responsibility — Nature and kinds of State responsibility — For wrongs unconnected with contractual obligations — Acts and omissions of State organs and officials — Exhaustio...
Revolusi Layanan Hukum: Implementasi Convention Apostille dan Dampaknya Terhadap Proses Legalisasi Dokumen di Indonesia
Revolusi Layanan Hukum: Implementasi Convention Apostille dan Dampaknya Terhadap Proses Legalisasi Dokumen di Indonesia
This research explores the implementation of the Apostille Convention in the Indonesian legal system with a focus on Apostille legalization services. The Convention is intended to ...
Azurix Corporation v. Argentine Republic
Azurix Corporation v. Argentine Republic
528Annulment — Stay of enforcement — ICSID Convention, Article 52(1) — Provision of security — Discretion of ad hoc committee to decide on security — Burden on claimant to show sec...
WTO AGREEMENTS: WAYS OF INTERPRETATION
WTO AGREEMENTS: WAYS OF INTERPRETATION
Background. The most of the world’s trade relations are governed by uniform rules that form the legal basis of the WTO. Member states sometimes have different understanding of the ...
Balancing Trade and Competition in Pakistan
Balancing Trade and Competition in Pakistan
High tariff rates have increased the overall cost of production in Pakistan, and the domestic prices of many products have become much higher than the international market prices. ...

Back to Top