Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Folklore

View through CrossRef
Folklore as a scholarly term is used in a broad sense to refer to manifestations of traditional knowledge: that is, cultural practices and expressions learned through word of mouth, imitation and demonstration, and custom. In the narrower sense of popular usage, it often refers to oral expressions such as legends, folktales, songs, and proverbs, while social and material traditions such as architecture, crafts, rituals, and festivals are associated with folklife. One reason for this distinction is that oral expression construed as “verbal art” draws attention to itself because of its imaginative or performative features. Houses and crafts often are presented as tangible or subsistence parts of “everyday life”; further, the suffix of “life” more than “lore” is often attached to rituals, customs, and festivals as part of the “round of life.” Most university programs and public centers devoted to the subject connect the two approaches in a shared concern for vernacular or heritage practices and in North America often use a singular label of folklore studies, folk studies, or folkloristics. In Europe, the commonly used rubrics of ethnology and ethnography typically include studies of folklore and folklife, and give special attention to traditional practices and community studies. The professionals who study folklore are called “folklorists.” The use of “folklore” to signify traditions and their study dates back to 1846, when the British editor William John Thoms inspired by the works of the Brothers Grimm on Volkspoesie (literature of the common people) in the early 19th century suggested the old English term “folklore” for what had previously been referred to as “popular antiquities” or “popular literature” and the reference caught on in the press. In the Victorian period, “folk” represented the common people (often construed as peasants or isolated, uneducated, or lower-class groups), whereas “lore” referred to their inherited wisdom and expressions. In the 20th century, scholars revised this view with a more elastic definition emphasizing the emergence and agency of folklore by pointing to the use of expressive traditions or “artistic communication” by anyone interacting in groups. Another development from folklife studies was to consider repeated human practices, or cultural behavioral processes within a community context, as traditional, or emerging as traditional, and therefore inviting folkloristic analysis in relation to the individualism, commercialism, and novelty of modernity or popular culture. Folk culture was differentiated from popular culture because of the former’s frequent localization, as well as participatory and variable nature. Scholars found folklore active and significant enough in modern life to assign social identity, negotiate collective memory, deal with cultural anxieties, and legislate social behavior. In the 21st century, folklorists further revised pre-digital concepts of folklore as face-to-face communication to represent electronic and visual transmission in light of the rise of vernacular practices and global transmission on the Internet and cyberculture. Scholars, particularly in North America and Europe, investigated ways that technology gave rise to traditions and the means by which these traditions differed from other social contexts. In the sections that follow, the concentration of titles is on English-language scholarship conducted in North America and Europe while drawing attention to notable folkloristic activity outside these continents.
Oxford University Press
Title: Folklore
Description:
Folklore as a scholarly term is used in a broad sense to refer to manifestations of traditional knowledge: that is, cultural practices and expressions learned through word of mouth, imitation and demonstration, and custom.
In the narrower sense of popular usage, it often refers to oral expressions such as legends, folktales, songs, and proverbs, while social and material traditions such as architecture, crafts, rituals, and festivals are associated with folklife.
One reason for this distinction is that oral expression construed as “verbal art” draws attention to itself because of its imaginative or performative features.
Houses and crafts often are presented as tangible or subsistence parts of “everyday life”; further, the suffix of “life” more than “lore” is often attached to rituals, customs, and festivals as part of the “round of life.
” Most university programs and public centers devoted to the subject connect the two approaches in a shared concern for vernacular or heritage practices and in North America often use a singular label of folklore studies, folk studies, or folkloristics.
In Europe, the commonly used rubrics of ethnology and ethnography typically include studies of folklore and folklife, and give special attention to traditional practices and community studies.
The professionals who study folklore are called “folklorists.
” The use of “folklore” to signify traditions and their study dates back to 1846, when the British editor William John Thoms inspired by the works of the Brothers Grimm on Volkspoesie (literature of the common people) in the early 19th century suggested the old English term “folklore” for what had previously been referred to as “popular antiquities” or “popular literature” and the reference caught on in the press.
In the Victorian period, “folk” represented the common people (often construed as peasants or isolated, uneducated, or lower-class groups), whereas “lore” referred to their inherited wisdom and expressions.
In the 20th century, scholars revised this view with a more elastic definition emphasizing the emergence and agency of folklore by pointing to the use of expressive traditions or “artistic communication” by anyone interacting in groups.
Another development from folklife studies was to consider repeated human practices, or cultural behavioral processes within a community context, as traditional, or emerging as traditional, and therefore inviting folkloristic analysis in relation to the individualism, commercialism, and novelty of modernity or popular culture.
Folk culture was differentiated from popular culture because of the former’s frequent localization, as well as participatory and variable nature.
Scholars found folklore active and significant enough in modern life to assign social identity, negotiate collective memory, deal with cultural anxieties, and legislate social behavior.
In the 21st century, folklorists further revised pre-digital concepts of folklore as face-to-face communication to represent electronic and visual transmission in light of the rise of vernacular practices and global transmission on the Internet and cyberculture.
Scholars, particularly in North America and Europe, investigated ways that technology gave rise to traditions and the means by which these traditions differed from other social contexts.
In the sections that follow, the concentration of titles is on English-language scholarship conducted in North America and Europe while drawing attention to notable folkloristic activity outside these continents.

Related Results

Archival Organization of Electronic Field Folklore Materials
Archival Organization of Electronic Field Folklore Materials
Considered such an important element of folklore archiving as the archival organization of electronic field folklore materials (different forms of recording: audio and video record...
Intertextual Study in Comparative Literature: Folklore of Oedipus and Folklore of Sangkuriang
Intertextual Study in Comparative Literature: Folklore of Oedipus and Folklore of Sangkuriang
The purpose of this research is to identify intertextual study in comparative literature of Oedipus folklore and Sangkuriang folklore. The intertextual study of comparative literat...
How Olya Died and Folklore Was Born
How Olya Died and Folklore Was Born
The subject of discussion in this article comprises the ways in which a literary piece becomes folklore. In order to elucidate this, the author discusses a poem by Aleksey Apuchtin...
An attempt to use ontologies in folklore studies
An attempt to use ontologies in folklore studies
The paper examines the method of using ontologies in folklore study by describing it on the example of the electronic portal system “Folklore of the peoples of Siberia”. Ontologica...
Features of collecting Kazakh folklore and methods of collecting folklore of the first half of the XX century
Features of collecting Kazakh folklore and methods of collecting folklore of the first half of the XX century
Relevance. The collection and study of Kazakh folklore are crucial for preserving the rich cultural heritage and ensuring its transmission to future generations. Understanding the ...
Latvian Hillfort Folklore: Historical and Contemporary Insights
Latvian Hillfort Folklore: Historical and Contemporary Insights
The article examines Latvian hillfort folklore using an interdisciplinary approach that combines data from archaeology, folkloristics and ethnological research. Particular attentio...
Folkloristics without Illusions. Some Thoughts on the Contexts of Folklore Research by Donatas Sauka
Folkloristics without Illusions. Some Thoughts on the Contexts of Folklore Research by Donatas Sauka
The 90th anniversary of birth of the famous Lithuanian literary scholar and folklorist, professor of the Vilnius University Donatas Sauka (1929–2015) is celebrated in 2019. The art...
Revitalisasi Cerita Rakyat Masyarakat Timor Sebagai Penguatan Nilai Pendidikan Karakter Pada Era Tatanan Kehidupan Baru
Revitalisasi Cerita Rakyat Masyarakat Timor Sebagai Penguatan Nilai Pendidikan Karakter Pada Era Tatanan Kehidupan Baru
Abstrak   Artikel hasil penelitian ini bertujuan untuk merevitalisasi berbagai bentuk cerita rakyat masyarakat Timor yang penuh dengan nilai kearifan lokal dan muatan p...

Back to Top