Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Multi-Level Governance and Public Administration

View through CrossRef
The literature on multi-level governance (MLG) and the field of the administrative sciences and public administration (PA) can be fruitfully integrated in order to generate knowledge about “the administrative dimension of MLG.” MLG may be defined by Piattoni as “the simultaneous activation of governmental and non-governmental actors at various jurisdictional levels” and perspectives derived from MLG may be applied to a wide set of issues spanning from political mobilization (politics), to policymaking (policy), to state restructuring (polity). It is along each of these sets of issues that it is possible to delineate the contribution that the field of PA can provide to the development of MLG. To MLG as political mobilization, the PA literature brings insights about participatory approaches and collaborative governance. To MLG as policy in multi-level settings, the PA literature brings insights about the functioning of multi-level administration and the role of a multi-level bureaucracy in policymaking processes occurring in compound political systems; the PA literature also contributes insights on public accountability in systems where decision responsibility is blurred, and issues of legitimacy arise. To MLG as polity restructuring, the PA literature offers insights on the administrative dimension of polity restructuring processes, as well as on the dynamics of systemic change and the change management of public governance arrangements. The study of MLG may benefit from drawing from a range of conceptual tools and models developed in the field of PA. Complementarily, PA as an interdisciplinary field of scholarship may benefit from the perspective of MLG, which provides it with a platform to expand the application of concepts like those of collaborative governance; bureaucratic influence on policymaking; public accountability in multi-actor, multi-level settings; or systemic-level change management. In this sense, the generation of knowledge about the administrative dimension of MLG is an addition to both MLG studies and to the field of PA.
Title: Multi-Level Governance and Public Administration
Description:
The literature on multi-level governance (MLG) and the field of the administrative sciences and public administration (PA) can be fruitfully integrated in order to generate knowledge about “the administrative dimension of MLG.
” MLG may be defined by Piattoni as “the simultaneous activation of governmental and non-governmental actors at various jurisdictional levels” and perspectives derived from MLG may be applied to a wide set of issues spanning from political mobilization (politics), to policymaking (policy), to state restructuring (polity).
It is along each of these sets of issues that it is possible to delineate the contribution that the field of PA can provide to the development of MLG.
To MLG as political mobilization, the PA literature brings insights about participatory approaches and collaborative governance.
To MLG as policy in multi-level settings, the PA literature brings insights about the functioning of multi-level administration and the role of a multi-level bureaucracy in policymaking processes occurring in compound political systems; the PA literature also contributes insights on public accountability in systems where decision responsibility is blurred, and issues of legitimacy arise.
To MLG as polity restructuring, the PA literature offers insights on the administrative dimension of polity restructuring processes, as well as on the dynamics of systemic change and the change management of public governance arrangements.
The study of MLG may benefit from drawing from a range of conceptual tools and models developed in the field of PA.
Complementarily, PA as an interdisciplinary field of scholarship may benefit from the perspective of MLG, which provides it with a platform to expand the application of concepts like those of collaborative governance; bureaucratic influence on policymaking; public accountability in multi-actor, multi-level settings; or systemic-level change management.
In this sense, the generation of knowledge about the administrative dimension of MLG is an addition to both MLG studies and to the field of PA.

Related Results

How Should College Physical Education (CPE) Conduct Collaborative Governance? A Survey Based on Chinese Colleges
How Should College Physical Education (CPE) Conduct Collaborative Governance? A Survey Based on Chinese Colleges
Background and Aim: College physical education (CPE) is a Key Stage in the transition from school physical education to national sports. Collaborative governance is an effective ne...
New Public Management in the Public Administration System
New Public Management in the Public Administration System
The purpose of the article is to study the concept of new management, clarify the essence, goals and tasks of new public management as an approach to organizing the activities of p...
Good Governance in Rural Local Administration
Good Governance in Rural Local Administration
The governance principle is an important aspect of good governance, and its implementation is believed to have a good impact on governance outcomes, such as corruption reduction an...
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Bioethics-CSR Divide
Photo by Sean Pollock on Unsplash ABSTRACT Bioethics and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) were born out of similar concerns, such as the reaction to scandal and the restraint ...
Exploring the Path of Modernization of Urban Community Governance
Exploring the Path of Modernization of Urban Community Governance
China has entered a new journey of building a modern socialist country in an all-round way. As the basic unit of urban grassroots governance and the spatial organisation of social ...
Public participation and ‘good’ urban governance
Public participation and ‘good’ urban governance
In the 21st century, with the development of globalization and urbanization in the whole world, and the economic and social advancement, the managing structure and methods of the u...
Navigating the nexus: Enhancing engagement in New Zealand’s clinical governance landscape
Navigating the nexus: Enhancing engagement in New Zealand’s clinical governance landscape
This study explores the experiences of engagement in clinical governance within New Zealand's rural, primary, and urban health sectors before the July 2022 health sector reform tha...

Back to Top