Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Bullshit Ability as an Honest Signal of Intelligence
View through CrossRef
The ability to navigate social systems efficiently is critical to our species. Humans appear endowed with a cognitive system that has at least partially formed to best meet the unique cognitive challenges that emerge in a highly social species. Bullshitting, a style of communication characterised by an intent to be convincing or impressive without concern for the truth, is ubiquitous within human societies. Across two studies (N = 1,017), we assess whether participants’ ability to produce satisfying and seemingly accurate bullshit (i.e., explanations of fake concepts) acts as an honest signal of their intelligence. Consistent with our hypotheses, we find that bullshit ability is predictive of participants’ intelligence and individuals capable of producing more satisfying bullshit are judged by second-hand observers to be higher in intelligence. We interpret these results as adding further evidence for human intelligence being naturally geared towards the efficient navigation of social systems. The ability to produce satisfying bullshit may serve to assist individuals in negotiating their social world, both as an energetically efficient strategy for impressing others and as an honest signal of one’s intelligence.
Center for Open Science
Title: Bullshit Ability as an Honest Signal of Intelligence
Description:
The ability to navigate social systems efficiently is critical to our species.
Humans appear endowed with a cognitive system that has at least partially formed to best meet the unique cognitive challenges that emerge in a highly social species.
Bullshitting, a style of communication characterised by an intent to be convincing or impressive without concern for the truth, is ubiquitous within human societies.
Across two studies (N = 1,017), we assess whether participants’ ability to produce satisfying and seemingly accurate bullshit (i.
e.
, explanations of fake concepts) acts as an honest signal of their intelligence.
Consistent with our hypotheses, we find that bullshit ability is predictive of participants’ intelligence and individuals capable of producing more satisfying bullshit are judged by second-hand observers to be higher in intelligence.
We interpret these results as adding further evidence for human intelligence being naturally geared towards the efficient navigation of social systems.
The ability to produce satisfying bullshit may serve to assist individuals in negotiating their social world, both as an energetically efficient strategy for impressing others and as an honest signal of one’s intelligence.
Related Results
Individual Differences in Receptivity to Scientific Bullshit
Individual Differences in Receptivity to Scientific Bullshit
Pseudo profound bullshit receptivity is the tendency to perceive meaning in important-sounding, nonsense statements. To understand how bullshit receptivity differs across domains, ...
Falling for Bullshit
Falling for Bullshit
Abstract
“Bullshit receptivity” is a newly validated psychological construct defined as the tendency to perceive meaning in statements that sound profound on the sur...
Be Careful! That is Probably Bullshit! Review of <em> Calling Bullshit: The Art of Skepticism in a Data-Driven World </em> by Carl T. Bergstrom and Jevin D. West
Be Careful! That is Probably Bullshit! Review of <em> Calling Bullshit: The Art of Skepticism in a Data-Driven World </em> by Carl T. Bergstrom and Jevin D. West
Bergstrom, C. T., & West, J. D. 2021. Calling Bullshit: The Art of Skepticism in a Data-Driven World. NY: Random House. 336 pp. ISBN 978-0525509189
The authors provide a journe...
The Demand for Bullshit and Its Improbable Legal Solutions
The Demand for Bullshit and Its Improbable Legal Solutions
<p><span>Americans consume a lot of bullshit. Verifiable falsehoods and intentional disinformation are in the mix, but the biggest contributors to the pile are sloppy, ...
The trade-offs of honest and dishonest signals
The trade-offs of honest and dishonest signals
Explaining the evolution of honest versus dishonest signals has long posed a major challenge, but several recent developments should spur renewed interest in this problem. First, t...
The trade-offs of honest and dishonest signals
The trade-offs of honest and dishonest signals
Explaining the evolution of honest versus dishonest signals under conflicts of interest has long posed a major challenge, but several recent developments should spur renewed intere...
"Intelligence, Social and Emotional Intelligence: Correlation of Concepts in Modern Psychology "
"Intelligence, Social and Emotional Intelligence: Correlation of Concepts in Modern Psychology "
The purpose of our article is to carry out an analysis of the author’s research on social intelligence according to Structural and Functional Approach; describe our researches of S...
Antidote Response Network
Antidote Response Network
Introduction:
The Antidote Response Network (ARN) strengthens local preparedness and response to a chemical incident by addressing local antidote availability, ...

