Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Safety of balanced propofol and midazolam in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for sedation in cirrhotic patients

View through CrossRef
Abstract Objective: Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) in patients with cirrhosis is theoretically associated with high incidence of adverse events due to low levels of binding proteins and decreased hepatic clearance of drugs. The objective of the study was to assess the safety of combined propofol and midazolam sedation in cirrhotic patients undergoing UGIE. Methods: A total of 500 patients undergoing UGIE were divided in to two groups in a prospective observational study from Jan 1st 2018 to June 30th 2018. Group (I) consisted of cirrhotic patients who underwent the procedure with sedation and Group (II) consisted of non-cirrhotic patients who opted for sedation. The main outcome measurements included vitals monitoring before, during and after procedure, total sedation dose, time to initial and deep sedation, recovery time and complications. Results: There was no significant difference between sedation safety and rate of complications for the cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients except for the recovery period during initial 10 minutes. The Modified Aldrete score for the cirrhotic patients was 9.5±0.5 min as compared to 9.8±0.4 min for non-cirrhotic patients (p<0.001) at 10 minutes. Grade 2 hepatic encephalopathy was seen in 0.8% of the cirrhotic patients who required hospitalization for 24 hours. Also balanced sedation was acceptable by the patients and the endoscopists equally with statistically significant scores on endoscopist’s assessment of co-operation and assessment of patient’s satisfaction scores. Continuous...
Title: Safety of balanced propofol and midazolam in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy for sedation in cirrhotic patients
Description:
Abstract Objective: Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGIE) in patients with cirrhosis is theoretically associated with high incidence of adverse events due to low levels of binding proteins and decreased hepatic clearance of drugs.
The objective of the study was to assess the safety of combined propofol and midazolam sedation in cirrhotic patients undergoing UGIE.
Methods: A total of 500 patients undergoing UGIE were divided in to two groups in a prospective observational study from Jan 1st 2018 to June 30th 2018.
Group (I) consisted of cirrhotic patients who underwent the procedure with sedation and Group (II) consisted of non-cirrhotic patients who opted for sedation.
The main outcome measurements included vitals monitoring before, during and after procedure, total sedation dose, time to initial and deep sedation, recovery time and complications.
Results: There was no significant difference between sedation safety and rate of complications for the cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients except for the recovery period during initial 10 minutes.
The Modified Aldrete score for the cirrhotic patients was 9.
5±0.
5 min as compared to 9.
8±0.
4 min for non-cirrhotic patients (p<0.
001) at 10 minutes.
Grade 2 hepatic encephalopathy was seen in 0.
8% of the cirrhotic patients who required hospitalization for 24 hours.
Also balanced sedation was acceptable by the patients and the endoscopists equally with statistically significant scores on endoscopist’s assessment of co-operation and assessment of patient’s satisfaction scores.
Continuous.

Related Results

Midazolam for sedation before procedures in adults and children: a systematic review update
Midazolam for sedation before procedures in adults and children: a systematic review update
Abstract Background Midazolam is used for sedation before diagnostic and therapeutic medical procedures by several routes including oral, intravenou...
Low Dose Midazolam versus Propofol for Conscious Sedation During Diagnostic Endoscopy for Day Case Surgery: A randomized clinical trial
Low Dose Midazolam versus Propofol for Conscious Sedation During Diagnostic Endoscopy for Day Case Surgery: A randomized clinical trial
Background: As endoscopy is an invasive and painful procedure, it is necessary to use a suitable sedative in terms of anesthetic efficacy. There is a lack of evidence comparing the...
Safety of endoscopist-guided sedation in a low-risk collective
Safety of endoscopist-guided sedation in a low-risk collective
Abstract Introduction Worldwide, gastrointestinal endoscopies are predominantly performed under sedation. National and international guidelines and recommendations contai...
Comparison of midazolam, propofol and fentanyl combinations for sedation and hemodynamic parameters in cataract extraction
Comparison of midazolam, propofol and fentanyl combinations for sedation and hemodynamic parameters in cataract extraction
OBJECTIVE: Midazolam, propofol and fentanyl were compared in terms of sedation during cataract extraction. Hemodynamic parameters, sedation level, postoperative satisfaction, and s...
A comparison of oral midazolam and ketamine with oral midazolam and promethazine in paediatric sedation
A comparison of oral midazolam and ketamine with oral midazolam and promethazine in paediatric sedation
Introduction Conscious sedation is frequently employed for the management of pre-cooperative or extremely anxious and painful procedures in emergency department...
EVALUATION OF THE SEDATIVE EFFECT OF PROPOFOL IN COMBINATION WITH FENTANYL IN COLONOSCOPY
EVALUATION OF THE SEDATIVE EFFECT OF PROPOFOL IN COMBINATION WITH FENTANYL IN COLONOSCOPY
Background: Colonoscopy is one of the most common procedures. Sedation and analgesia decrease anxiety and discomfort and minimize risks. Therefore, patients prefer to be sedated in...

Back to Top