Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Comparison of midazolam, propofol and fentanyl combinations for sedation and hemodynamic parameters in cataract extraction

View through CrossRef
OBJECTIVE: Midazolam, propofol and fentanyl were compared in terms of sedation during cataract extraction. Hemodynamic parameters, sedation level, postoperative satisfaction, and side effects were investigated. METHODS: The study was carried out in Hacettepe University Hospitals Ophthalmology Operating Theatres in 2005. The patients received only midazolam (0.02 mg kg-1), or midazolam (0.02 mg kg-1) + propofol (0.2 mg kg-1), or midazolam (0.02 mg kg-1) + fentanyl (1 microgram kg-1), or midazolam (0.02 mg kg-1) + propofol (0.2 mg kg-1) + fentanyl (1 microgram kg-1). The sedation level of patients was measured according to a physician questionnaire. Postoperative nausea/vomiting, headache, and patient satisfaction were determined via a patient9s evaluation scale. RESULTS: In the groups receiving fentanyl, the hemodynamic response to peribulbar block insertion was minimal (p<0.05) and the sedation level was best (p<0.05). Respiration rate and O2 saturation of patients receiving midazolam, propofol, and fentanyl decreased after sedation (p<0.01) and postoperative satisfaction was high in this group (p<0.01). Patients in the midazolam group showed a prominent reaction to peribulbar block insertion while movement during the operation was obvious (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The combination of midazolam, propofol, and fentanyl should be preferred to other study groups as the sedation level is suitable for cataract extraction with high postoperative patient satisfaction and without any side effects.
Title: Comparison of midazolam, propofol and fentanyl combinations for sedation and hemodynamic parameters in cataract extraction
Description:
OBJECTIVE: Midazolam, propofol and fentanyl were compared in terms of sedation during cataract extraction.
Hemodynamic parameters, sedation level, postoperative satisfaction, and side effects were investigated.
METHODS: The study was carried out in Hacettepe University Hospitals Ophthalmology Operating Theatres in 2005.
The patients received only midazolam (0.
02 mg kg-1), or midazolam (0.
02 mg kg-1) + propofol (0.
2 mg kg-1), or midazolam (0.
02 mg kg-1) + fentanyl (1 microgram kg-1), or midazolam (0.
02 mg kg-1) + propofol (0.
2 mg kg-1) + fentanyl (1 microgram kg-1).
The sedation level of patients was measured according to a physician questionnaire.
Postoperative nausea/vomiting, headache, and patient satisfaction were determined via a patient9s evaluation scale.
RESULTS: In the groups receiving fentanyl, the hemodynamic response to peribulbar block insertion was minimal (p<0.
05) and the sedation level was best (p<0.
05).
Respiration rate and O2 saturation of patients receiving midazolam, propofol, and fentanyl decreased after sedation (p<0.
01) and postoperative satisfaction was high in this group (p<0.
01).
Patients in the midazolam group showed a prominent reaction to peribulbar block insertion while movement during the operation was obvious (p<0.
05).
CONCLUSION: The combination of midazolam, propofol, and fentanyl should be preferred to other study groups as the sedation level is suitable for cataract extraction with high postoperative patient satisfaction and without any side effects.

Related Results

Midazolam for sedation before procedures in adults and children: a systematic review update
Midazolam for sedation before procedures in adults and children: a systematic review update
Abstract Background Midazolam is used for sedation before diagnostic and therapeutic medical procedures by several routes including oral, intravenou...
EVALUATION OF THE SEDATIVE EFFECT OF PROPOFOL IN COMBINATION WITH FENTANYL IN COLONOSCOPY
EVALUATION OF THE SEDATIVE EFFECT OF PROPOFOL IN COMBINATION WITH FENTANYL IN COLONOSCOPY
Background: Colonoscopy is one of the most common procedures. Sedation and analgesia decrease anxiety and discomfort and minimize risks. Therefore, patients prefer to be sedated in...
A comparison of oral midazolam and ketamine with oral midazolam and promethazine in paediatric sedation
A comparison of oral midazolam and ketamine with oral midazolam and promethazine in paediatric sedation
Introduction Conscious sedation is frequently employed for the management of pre-cooperative or extremely anxious and painful procedures in emergency department...
Low Dose Midazolam versus Propofol for Conscious Sedation During Diagnostic Endoscopy for Day Case Surgery: A randomized clinical trial
Low Dose Midazolam versus Propofol for Conscious Sedation During Diagnostic Endoscopy for Day Case Surgery: A randomized clinical trial
Background: As endoscopy is an invasive and painful procedure, it is necessary to use a suitable sedative in terms of anesthetic efficacy. There is a lack of evidence comparing the...

Back to Top