Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Comparison of midazolam, propofol and fentanyl combinations for sedation and hemodynamic parameters in cataract extraction
View through CrossRef
OBJECTIVE: Midazolam, propofol and fentanyl were compared in terms of sedation during cataract extraction. Hemodynamic parameters, sedation level, postoperative satisfaction, and side effects were investigated. METHODS: The study was carried out in Hacettepe University Hospitals Ophthalmology Operating Theatres in 2005. The patients received only midazolam (0.02 mg kg-1), or midazolam (0.02 mg kg-1) + propofol (0.2 mg kg-1), or midazolam (0.02 mg kg-1) + fentanyl (1 microgram kg-1), or midazolam (0.02 mg kg-1) + propofol (0.2 mg kg-1) + fentanyl (1 microgram kg-1). The sedation level of patients was measured according to a physician questionnaire. Postoperative nausea/vomiting, headache, and patient satisfaction were determined via a patient9s evaluation scale. RESULTS: In the groups receiving fentanyl, the hemodynamic response to peribulbar block insertion was minimal (p<0.05) and the sedation level was best (p<0.05). Respiration rate and O2 saturation of patients receiving midazolam, propofol, and fentanyl decreased after sedation (p<0.01) and postoperative satisfaction was high in this group (p<0.01). Patients in the midazolam group showed a prominent reaction to peribulbar block insertion while movement during the operation was obvious (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The combination of midazolam, propofol, and fentanyl should be preferred to other study groups as the sedation level is suitable for cataract extraction with high postoperative patient satisfaction and without any side effects.
Armed Forces Medical Services
Title: Comparison of midazolam, propofol and fentanyl combinations for sedation and hemodynamic parameters in cataract extraction
Description:
OBJECTIVE: Midazolam, propofol and fentanyl were compared in terms of sedation during cataract extraction.
Hemodynamic parameters, sedation level, postoperative satisfaction, and side effects were investigated.
METHODS: The study was carried out in Hacettepe University Hospitals Ophthalmology Operating Theatres in 2005.
The patients received only midazolam (0.
02 mg kg-1), or midazolam (0.
02 mg kg-1) + propofol (0.
2 mg kg-1), or midazolam (0.
02 mg kg-1) + fentanyl (1 microgram kg-1), or midazolam (0.
02 mg kg-1) + propofol (0.
2 mg kg-1) + fentanyl (1 microgram kg-1).
The sedation level of patients was measured according to a physician questionnaire.
Postoperative nausea/vomiting, headache, and patient satisfaction were determined via a patient9s evaluation scale.
RESULTS: In the groups receiving fentanyl, the hemodynamic response to peribulbar block insertion was minimal (p<0.
05) and the sedation level was best (p<0.
05).
Respiration rate and O2 saturation of patients receiving midazolam, propofol, and fentanyl decreased after sedation (p<0.
01) and postoperative satisfaction was high in this group (p<0.
01).
Patients in the midazolam group showed a prominent reaction to peribulbar block insertion while movement during the operation was obvious (p<0.
05).
CONCLUSION: The combination of midazolam, propofol, and fentanyl should be preferred to other study groups as the sedation level is suitable for cataract extraction with high postoperative patient satisfaction and without any side effects.
Related Results
Midazolam for sedation before procedures in adults and children: a systematic review update
Midazolam for sedation before procedures in adults and children: a systematic review update
Abstract
Background
Midazolam is used for sedation before diagnostic and therapeutic medical procedures by several routes including oral, intravenou...
EVALUATION OF THE SEDATIVE EFFECT OF PROPOFOL IN COMBINATION WITH FENTANYL IN COLONOSCOPY
EVALUATION OF THE SEDATIVE EFFECT OF PROPOFOL IN COMBINATION WITH FENTANYL IN COLONOSCOPY
Background: Colonoscopy is one of the most common procedures. Sedation and analgesia decrease anxiety and discomfort and minimize risks. Therefore, patients prefer to be sedated in...
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF INTRATHECAL MIDAZOLAM(1MG) AND FENTANYL(25 MICROGRAMS) AS ADDITIVES TO INTRATHECAL HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE 0.5%(15MG) IN SPINALANAESTHESIA
A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF INTRATHECAL MIDAZOLAM(1MG) AND FENTANYL(25 MICROGRAMS) AS ADDITIVES TO INTRATHECAL HYPERBARIC BUPIVACAINE 0.5%(15MG) IN SPINALANAESTHESIA
Background: Various intrathecal additives are added to local anesthetics to increase the speed of onset, improve the quality, and prolong the
inuence of spinal anesthesia. Midazol...
Sedation for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) – A comparative study between propofol-fentanyl with Propofol-fentanyl-ketamine Combination
Sedation for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) – A comparative study between propofol-fentanyl with Propofol-fentanyl-ketamine Combination
Background: Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is a painful and long procedure requiring transient deep sedation and analgesia. The purpose of our study was cond...
A comparison of oral midazolam and ketamine with oral midazolam and promethazine in paediatric sedation
A comparison of oral midazolam and ketamine with oral midazolam and promethazine in paediatric sedation
Introduction
Conscious sedation is frequently employed for the management of pre-cooperative or extremely anxious and painful procedures in emergency department...
Low Dose Midazolam versus Propofol for Conscious Sedation During Diagnostic Endoscopy for Day Case Surgery: A randomized clinical trial
Low Dose Midazolam versus Propofol for Conscious Sedation During Diagnostic Endoscopy for Day Case Surgery: A randomized clinical trial
Background: As endoscopy is an invasive and painful procedure, it is necessary to use a suitable sedative in terms of anesthetic efficacy. There is a lack of evidence comparing the...
A STUDY COMPARING CLONIDINE WITH PROPOFOL AND FENTANYL WITH PROPOFOL FOR HEMODYNAMIC AND RESPIRATORY RESPONSES DURING AMBU LMA INSERTION
A STUDY COMPARING CLONIDINE WITH PROPOFOL AND FENTANYL WITH PROPOFOL FOR HEMODYNAMIC AND RESPIRATORY RESPONSES DURING AMBU LMA INSERTION
Background: Insertion of supraglottic airway devices such as AMBU LMA requires adequate anaesthetic depth to suppress airway reflexes while maintaining stable hemodynamics ...
COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY BETWEEN INTRAVENOUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE WITH FENTANYL VERSUS INTRAVENOUS PROPOFOL WITH FENTANYL FOR SEDATION IN DIAGNOSTIC UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS AND SAFETY BETWEEN INTRAVENOUS DEXMEDETOMIDINE WITH FENTANYL VERSUS INTRAVENOUS PROPOFOL WITH FENTANYL FOR SEDATION IN DIAGNOSTIC UPPER GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of intravenous dexmedetomidine with fentanyl versus intravenous propofol with fentanyl for sedation in ...

