Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Later Descartes

View through CrossRef
Descartes’s third model of perception is stated in the sixth Replies. This chapter explores the three ‘grades of sensory perception’ and argues that, for the first and only time in his career, Descartes here claims that we must use our awareness of color to judge the common sensibles. Descartes’s final model abandons this claim. Instead, his later works posit a purely causal explanation for the occurrence of sensations and ideas. It is still up to the mind to ‘refer’ these things to objects in the subject’s environment. This chapter concludes with an argument from Nicolas Malebranche that makes all four stages problematic. According to this ‘selection argument,’ there is no way for the mind to know which of its ideas or sensations it should summon (stage one), nor is there any way to know which object should be paired with which idea or sensation (stages two, three, and four).
Oxford University Press
Title: Later Descartes
Description:
Descartes’s third model of perception is stated in the sixth Replies.
This chapter explores the three ‘grades of sensory perception’ and argues that, for the first and only time in his career, Descartes here claims that we must use our awareness of color to judge the common sensibles.
Descartes’s final model abandons this claim.
Instead, his later works posit a purely causal explanation for the occurrence of sensations and ideas.
It is still up to the mind to ‘refer’ these things to objects in the subject’s environment.
This chapter concludes with an argument from Nicolas Malebranche that makes all four stages problematic.
According to this ‘selection argument,’ there is no way for the mind to know which of its ideas or sensations it should summon (stage one), nor is there any way to know which object should be paired with which idea or sensation (stages two, three, and four).

Related Results

Descartes and Spinoza
Descartes and Spinoza
In the 17th century, Descartes and Spinoza each provided interesting and influential approaches to answering the question: what is the relationship between a mind and its body? Des...
Baumgarten, Wolff, Descartes, and the Origins of Psychology
Baumgarten, Wolff, Descartes, and the Origins of Psychology
This chapter moves away from discussion of Baumgarten’s relation to Pietism and the Leibnizian–Wolffian philosophy to examine its place, with particular attention to psychology, wi...
‘I’ve Got a Little List’
‘I’ve Got a Little List’
Although taxonomy is often a dull and dusty business, it thrived among seventeenth-century writers on the passions. Most authors followed earlier taxonomies found in Aristotle, the...
Introduction
Introduction
The Introduction outlines the various chapters. It then situates the question of ‘body’ in the modern Western philosophical tradition following Descartes, and argues that this leav...
Isaac Newton: Philosophical Writings
Isaac Newton: Philosophical Writings
Sir Isaac Newton (1642–1727) left a voluminous legacy of writings. Despite his influence on the early modern period, his correspondence, manuscripts, and publications in natural p...
Gabrielle Suchon’s ‘Neutralist’
Gabrielle Suchon’s ‘Neutralist’
This chapter examines French thinker Gabrielle Suchon’s concept of ‘the neutralist’, a person who commits herself entirely to a life of celibacy and shuns the institutional commitm...
Gilles Deleuze
Gilles Deleuze
Perhaps the best way to approach the relationship between Deleuze and Agamben is to adopt a method from Deleuze and Guattari’s late philosophy: the conceptual persona.1 Here philos...
Nihilism
Nihilism
An examination of the meaning of meaninglessness: why it matters that nothing matters. When someone is labeled a nihilist, it's not usually meant as a compliment. Mo...

Back to Top