Javascript must be enabled to continue!
4. Character of defendant
View through CrossRef
The Concentrate Questions and Answers series offers the best preparation for tackling exam questions. Each book includes typical questions, bullet-pointed answer plans and suggested answers, author commentary and diagrams and flow charts. This chapter concerns a complex question in criminal evidence: situations where defendants may adduce evidence of good character to suggest lack of guilt and support credibility, and those where prosecution counsel or counsel for the co-defendant may cross-examine them on previous ‘reprehensible’ behaviour. The exclusionary rule was fundamental to the English legal system and founded on the principle that the defendant should have a fair trial. The Criminal Justice Act (CJA) 2003 made comprehensive changes to the rules of admissibility of evidence of bad character of the defendant and witnesses providing that ‘the common law rules governing the admissibility of evidence of bad character in criminal proceedings are abolished’. There is now a presumption of admissibility of that evidence.
Title: 4. Character of defendant
Description:
The Concentrate Questions and Answers series offers the best preparation for tackling exam questions.
Each book includes typical questions, bullet-pointed answer plans and suggested answers, author commentary and diagrams and flow charts.
This chapter concerns a complex question in criminal evidence: situations where defendants may adduce evidence of good character to suggest lack of guilt and support credibility, and those where prosecution counsel or counsel for the co-defendant may cross-examine them on previous ‘reprehensible’ behaviour.
The exclusionary rule was fundamental to the English legal system and founded on the principle that the defendant should have a fair trial.
The Criminal Justice Act (CJA) 2003 made comprehensive changes to the rules of admissibility of evidence of bad character of the defendant and witnesses providing that ‘the common law rules governing the admissibility of evidence of bad character in criminal proceedings are abolished’.
There is now a presumption of admissibility of that evidence.
Related Results
2. Medical negligence
2. Medical negligence
Each Concentrate revision guide is packed with essential information, key cases, revision tips, exam Q&As, and more. Concentrates show you what to expect in a law exam, what ex...
20. Additional Claims under Part 20
20. Additional Claims under Part 20
This chapter discusses the rules for additional claims under Part 20 of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 (CPR). An additional claim typically will seek to pass any liability establis...
20. Additional Claims under Part 20
20. Additional Claims under Part 20
This chapter discusses the rules for additional claims under Part 20 of the Civil Procedure Rules 1998 (CPR). An additional claim typically will seek to pass any liability establis...
Intentionalism’s Troubles Begin
Intentionalism’s Troubles Begin
This chapter puzzles over intentionalism’s odd exportation of the phenomenal character of perceptual experience. Evidently, a perceptual state's phenomenal character is intrinsic t...
Evidence Concentrate
Evidence Concentrate
Each Concentrate revision guide is packed with essential information, key cases, revision tips, exam Q&As, and more. Concentrates show you what to expect in a law exam, what ex...
The Project
The Project
This chapter explains what the author is trying to do—to clarify, for any character c, what it is to have a visual experience with character c; and how he tries to do it—by clarify...
Other Characters
Other Characters
In Chapters 2–8 the author considered a particular character, c1, and argued that there is a certain way of looking such that to have a visual experience with character c1 is to ha...

