Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement using a 19-mm bioprosthesis

View through CrossRef
Abstract   OBJECTIVES Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is known to be associated with improved haemodynamics in patients with aortic stenosis and a small aortic annulus. However, limited benchmark data are available regarding the long-term outcomes in patients treated with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). We investigated the long-term outcomes of SAVR using a 19-mm bioprosthesis. METHODS This study included consecutive patients who underwent SAVR using a 19-mm bioprosthesis at our hospital between 2008 and 2012. RESULTS In a total of 132 patients, moderate and severe prosthesis–patient mismatch occurred in 36 (27.3%) and 7 patients (5.3%), respectively. The median follow-up period was 7.7 years. The overall 5- and 10-year survival rates were 79.4% and 52.9%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year freedom from major adverse valve-related events rates were 89.6% and 74.2%, respectively. Neither moderate nor severe prosthesis–patient mismatch was associated with late mortality, major adverse valve-related events or heart failure. Follow-up echocardiographic data were obtained at a median interval of 4.8 years in 80% of patients who survived ≥6 months postoperatively. Follow-up echocardiographic data showed a significantly increased left ventricular ejection fraction, decreased mean transvalvular/transprosthetic pressure gradients and a decreased mean left ventricular mass. At follow-up, we observed moderate or severe haemodynamic structural valve deterioration in 17 patients; however, structural valve deterioration did not affect late survival or freedom from major adverse valve-related events rates, or heart failure. CONCLUSIONS SAVR using the 19-mm bioprosthesis was associated with satisfactory long-term clinical and haemodynamic outcomes.
Title: Long-term outcomes after aortic valve replacement using a 19-mm bioprosthesis
Description:
Abstract   OBJECTIVES Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is known to be associated with improved haemodynamics in patients with aortic stenosis and a small aortic annulus.
However, limited benchmark data are available regarding the long-term outcomes in patients treated with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR).
We investigated the long-term outcomes of SAVR using a 19-mm bioprosthesis.
METHODS This study included consecutive patients who underwent SAVR using a 19-mm bioprosthesis at our hospital between 2008 and 2012.
RESULTS In a total of 132 patients, moderate and severe prosthesis–patient mismatch occurred in 36 (27.
3%) and 7 patients (5.
3%), respectively.
The median follow-up period was 7.
7 years.
The overall 5- and 10-year survival rates were 79.
4% and 52.
9%, respectively.
The 5- and 10-year freedom from major adverse valve-related events rates were 89.
6% and 74.
2%, respectively.
Neither moderate nor severe prosthesis–patient mismatch was associated with late mortality, major adverse valve-related events or heart failure.
Follow-up echocardiographic data were obtained at a median interval of 4.
8 years in 80% of patients who survived ≥6 months postoperatively.
Follow-up echocardiographic data showed a significantly increased left ventricular ejection fraction, decreased mean transvalvular/transprosthetic pressure gradients and a decreased mean left ventricular mass.
At follow-up, we observed moderate or severe haemodynamic structural valve deterioration in 17 patients; however, structural valve deterioration did not affect late survival or freedom from major adverse valve-related events rates, or heart failure.
CONCLUSIONS SAVR using the 19-mm bioprosthesis was associated with satisfactory long-term clinical and haemodynamic outcomes.

Related Results

Mid-term outcomes of aortic valve replacement using the freedom solo® stentless bioprosthesis at Bach Mai Hospital
Mid-term outcomes of aortic valve replacement using the freedom solo® stentless bioprosthesis at Bach Mai Hospital
Objectives: To evaluate mid-term outcomes of aortic valve replacement using the Freedom Solo® stentless bioprosthesis (Sorin Biomedica Group) at Bach Mai hospital, Hanoi. Subjects ...
Abstract 4369914: Successful Transfemoral TAVR in a Patient with Chronic Aortic Dissection and Severe Aortic Insufficiency
Abstract 4369914: Successful Transfemoral TAVR in a Patient with Chronic Aortic Dissection and Severe Aortic Insufficiency
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is a well-established treatment for high-surgical-risk patients with severe aortic disease, providing a less invasive alternative to traditio...
The mid-term outcomes of aortic root replacement after surgical repair for CHD
The mid-term outcomes of aortic root replacement after surgical repair for CHD
AbstractObjective:The purpose of this study is to assess the mid-term outcomes of aortic root replacement after repair of CHDs.Method:This is a single-institutional retrospective, ...
AORTIC ROOT ANEURYSM OR ECTASIA TREATED WITH AORTIC ROOT WRAPPED PROCEDURE
AORTIC ROOT ANEURYSM OR ECTASIA TREATED WITH AORTIC ROOT WRAPPED PROCEDURE
Objectives To develop a relatively simple and effective and less risk operation, aortic root wrapped procedure, to treat with aortic root aneurysm or ectasia. ...
Bioprosthetic aortic valve degeneration: a review from a basic science perspective
Bioprosthetic aortic valve degeneration: a review from a basic science perspective
Background The increase in the prevalence of aortic stenosis due to an aging population has led to an increasing number of surgical aortic valve replacements. Over the past 20 year...
Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement by Congenital Heart Surgeons: A Single Center Experience.
Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement by Congenital Heart Surgeons: A Single Center Experience.
Background Aortic root dilatation and aortic insufficiency can occur in patients with prior conotruncal defect surgery, the Ross procedure, and connective tissue ...

Back to Top