Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Vinaya monasteries in the eyes of early Qing emperors
View through CrossRef
By the first half of the eighteenth century, lineages of the Buddhist Vinaya school (Lüzong) took hold in several monasteries in Beijing. However, when the Yongzheng emperor designed a grand ordination ceremony to be held in 1734 he opted to summon a Vinaya patriarch from a distant Mt Baohua near Nanjing. This article aims to provide an explanation for such a choice by means of exploring the image of relevant Vinaya monasteries in the eyes of early Qing emperors, relying mainly on the evidence in the gazetteers of these monasteries. Our findings show that Vinaya monasteries in Beijing, such as Tanzhe, Guangji, and Minzhong, enjoyed considerable imperial patronage. At the same time, only Minzhong monastery was perceived as a purely Vinaya site, while the image of its counterparts was rather heterogeneous. The main advantage that could have singled out the abbot of Mt Baohua Fuju (1686–1765) was the first full-fledged school genealogy that he compiled in 1733, while other monasteries in question did not possess an identity of sites with strong and stable Vinaya lineages at that time. Accordingly, Yongzheng might have wished to promote a genealogically organized Vinaya school as a check-andbalance against swelling Chan lineages.
Title: Vinaya monasteries in the eyes of early Qing emperors
Description:
By the first half of the eighteenth century, lineages of the Buddhist Vinaya school (Lüzong) took hold in several monasteries in Beijing.
However, when the Yongzheng emperor designed a grand ordination ceremony to be held in 1734 he opted to summon a Vinaya patriarch from a distant Mt Baohua near Nanjing.
This article aims to provide an explanation for such a choice by means of exploring the image of relevant Vinaya monasteries in the eyes of early Qing emperors, relying mainly on the evidence in the gazetteers of these monasteries.
Our findings show that Vinaya monasteries in Beijing, such as Tanzhe, Guangji, and Minzhong, enjoyed considerable imperial patronage.
At the same time, only Minzhong monastery was perceived as a purely Vinaya site, while the image of its counterparts was rather heterogeneous.
The main advantage that could have singled out the abbot of Mt Baohua Fuju (1686–1765) was the first full-fledged school genealogy that he compiled in 1733, while other monasteries in question did not possess an identity of sites with strong and stable Vinaya lineages at that time.
Accordingly, Yongzheng might have wished to promote a genealogically organized Vinaya school as a check-andbalance against swelling Chan lineages.
Related Results
On the Patriarchal Lineages of Vinaya Transmission Starting with Upāli: Narratives and Interpretations in the Vinaya School 律宗 in China and Japan
On the Patriarchal Lineages of Vinaya Transmission Starting with Upāli: Narratives and Interpretations in the Vinaya School 律宗 in China and Japan
In both Pāli and Chinese vinaya literature, there are various patriarchal lineages of vinaya transmission in which Upāli is honored as the first patriarch. These lineages that star...
Human–wildlife coexistence on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau: The correlation between Tibetan Buddhist monasteries and avian community composition
Human–wildlife coexistence on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau: The correlation between Tibetan Buddhist monasteries and avian community composition
Abstract
Tibetan Buddhist monasteries are widely distributed throughout the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau and are significant locations for human–wildlife coexistence. Given the signific...
Diverse Forms of Early Kucha Bhikṣuṇī Vinaya and Its Influence on the Transmission to China: Focusing on Prefaces to Chinese Vinaya Texts Before the Comprehensive Vinayas
Diverse Forms of Early Kucha Bhikṣuṇī Vinaya and Its Influence on the Transmission to China: Focusing on Prefaces to Chinese Vinaya Texts Before the Comprehensive Vinayas
This article examines two key texts preserved in the Chu Sanzang Jiji: the Biqiuni jieben suochu benmo xu and the Guanzhong Jinchu Ni Erzhong Tanwen Xiazuo Za Shi’er Shi Bing Zashi...
Master Shanghong (738?-815 CE) and the Formation of Regional Vinaya Traditions in Tang Buddhism
Master Shanghong (738?-815 CE) and the Formation of Regional Vinaya Traditions in Tang Buddhism
AbstractAfter the An Lushan Rebellion in 755, southern China witnessed the rise of the Vinaya movement. Essential sources on the local southern Vinaya communities include writings ...
The Vinaya
The Vinaya
This chapter focuses on the Vinaya Piṭaka, which is the first of the three traditional components of Buddhist scripture. Following an introduction that contextualizes this literatu...
Offences, Punishment and Rehabilitation in the Vinaya Pitaka
Offences, Punishment and Rehabilitation in the Vinaya Pitaka
Background: The Vinaya Pitaka, a comprehensive Buddhist scripture, contains a rich repository of ethical and moral guidelines.
Objective: This research paper explores the descrip...
Vinaya
Rules for Monks and Nuns
Vinaya
Rules for Monks and Nuns
Abstract
Vinaya rules are stipulations and advice that guide the Buddhist community (saṃgha) of monks and nuns. They are generally considered to be the basis of m...

