Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Psychological interpretation of the «special military operation» concept

View through CrossRef
The article is devoted to the psycholinguistic interpretation of the «special military operation» concept, which is rapidly spreading in the Russian informational space. Research methods: theoretical (psycholinguistic scheme of sign structure); empirical (psycholinguistic analysis of the relationship of the «special military operation» concept with other signs. The original psycholinguistic concept of sign structure is presented. The structure of the sign is binary (two-element), which causes its semantic contradiction. This structural and substantive anatomy of the sign provides the inexhaustibility of its definition, the ability to transform, complement. The «special military operation» concept allows us to trace the peculiarities of the formation of a new sign in the mass consciousness. Analysis of the official and media narrative allowed to assume that the structure of the sign under study in the minds of ordinary Russians is as follows: «special military operation»/«revenge». The first is the dominant and articulated element, and the other is the subdominant and is not realized in semantic relation to the dominant element. The connection of the sign elements is provided by the antonymous relations with the elements «peace» and «liberation», which, in turn, belong to other signs. Of interest is the prohibition of articulation of the antonym of the dominant element and the obsessive articulation of the antonym of the subdominant element. This clearly reflects the structural specifics of the sign, the peculiarities of its formation and functioning. It has been established that the concept of «special military operation» in the minds of ordinary Russians is due to the unsuccessfully suppressed desire for revenge on Ukrainians. The category of «liberation» hides this desire and protects the cognitive contradiction of the sign from splitting (disabsurdization) and the formation of new signs.
Pavlo Tychyna Uman State Pedagogical University
Title: Psychological interpretation of the «special military operation» concept
Description:
The article is devoted to the psycholinguistic interpretation of the «special military operation» concept, which is rapidly spreading in the Russian informational space.
Research methods: theoretical (psycholinguistic scheme of sign structure); empirical (psycholinguistic analysis of the relationship of the «special military operation» concept with other signs.
The original psycholinguistic concept of sign structure is presented.
The structure of the sign is binary (two-element), which causes its semantic contradiction.
This structural and substantive anatomy of the sign provides the inexhaustibility of its definition, the ability to transform, complement.
The «special military operation» concept allows us to trace the peculiarities of the formation of a new sign in the mass consciousness.
Analysis of the official and media narrative allowed to assume that the structure of the sign under study in the minds of ordinary Russians is as follows: «special military operation»/«revenge».
The first is the dominant and articulated element, and the other is the subdominant and is not realized in semantic relation to the dominant element.
The connection of the sign elements is provided by the antonymous relations with the elements «peace» and «liberation», which, in turn, belong to other signs.
Of interest is the prohibition of articulation of the antonym of the dominant element and the obsessive articulation of the antonym of the subdominant element.
This clearly reflects the structural specifics of the sign, the peculiarities of its formation and functioning.
It has been established that the concept of «special military operation» in the minds of ordinary Russians is due to the unsuccessfully suppressed desire for revenge on Ukrainians.
The category of «liberation» hides this desire and protects the cognitive contradiction of the sign from splitting (disabsurdization) and the formation of new signs.

Related Results

BASIC CONCEPTS OF PSYCHOLOGICAL SUPPORT - "PSYCHOLOGICAL SUPPORT", "PASTORING", "MENTORING" AMONG THE MILITARY SERVICES
BASIC CONCEPTS OF PSYCHOLOGICAL SUPPORT - "PSYCHOLOGICAL SUPPORT", "PASTORING", "MENTORING" AMONG THE MILITARY SERVICES
The article is devoted to the issue of psychological support of servicemen in professional activities, in particular the issue of psychological support, pastoral care and mentoring...
Integrated defence workforces: Challenges and enablers of military–civilian personnel collaboration
Integrated defence workforces: Challenges and enablers of military–civilian personnel collaboration
Abstract Defence organisations are unique in that they comprise integrated military and civilian personnel working in partnership with each other (e.g., in headquart...
Leaders, Generals, Juntas: The Military in Politics and International Conflict Initiation
Leaders, Generals, Juntas: The Military in Politics and International Conflict Initiation
International conflict—war, crises, international disputes, and rivalries between states—has a clear influence on the military’s role in politics and vice versa. Given that the mil...
Military Intelligence
Military Intelligence
The study of military intelligence lies at the intersection of “military” and “intelligence” history. The first is a rich and ancient field; the second is new, and smaller. The int...
Young Australians’ Attitudes to the Military and Military Service
Young Australians’ Attitudes to the Military and Military Service
What are young Australians’ understandings of, and attitudes to, the military and military service? This article describes a pilot study of 320 young Australian university students...
Politics in Uniforms: Military Influence in Politics and Conflictual State Behavior
Politics in Uniforms: Military Influence in Politics and Conflictual State Behavior
This dissertation examines how the state-building process relates to civil-military relations and how political influence of the military affects state's conflict behavior. By doin...

Back to Top