Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Measure semantics and qualitative semantics for epistemic modals

View through CrossRef
In this paper, we explore semantics for comparative epistemic modals that avoid the entailment problems shown by Yalcin (2006, 2009, 2010) to result from Kratzer’s (1991) semantics. In contrast to the alternative semantics presented by Yalcin and Lassiter (2010, 2011) based on finitely additive measures, we introduce semantics based on qualitatively additive measures, as well as semantics based on purely qualitative orderings, including orderings on propositions derived from orderings on worlds in the tradition of Kratzer (1991, 2012). All of these semantics avoid the entailment problems that result from Kratzer’s semantics. Our discussion focuses on methodological issues concerning the choice between different semantics.
Title: Measure semantics and qualitative semantics for epistemic modals
Description:
In this paper, we explore semantics for comparative epistemic modals that avoid the entailment problems shown by Yalcin (2006, 2009, 2010) to result from Kratzer’s (1991) semantics.
In contrast to the alternative semantics presented by Yalcin and Lassiter (2010, 2011) based on finitely additive measures, we introduce semantics based on qualitatively additive measures, as well as semantics based on purely qualitative orderings, including orderings on propositions derived from orderings on worlds in the tradition of Kratzer (1991, 2012).
All of these semantics avoid the entailment problems that result from Kratzer’s semantics.
Our discussion focuses on methodological issues concerning the choice between different semantics.

Related Results

College Students’ Epistemic Cognition, Epistemic Emotion, and Engagement: A Mediation Analysis
College Students’ Epistemic Cognition, Epistemic Emotion, and Engagement: A Mediation Analysis
Abstract Background: The college students' engagement has attracted the attention of scholars from various countries because it can impact student’s learning performance, ...
Epistemic Injustice or Epistemic Oppression?
Epistemic Injustice or Epistemic Oppression?
The concepts of epistemic injustice and epistemic oppression both aim to track obstacles to epistemic agencyーi.e., forms of epistemic exclusionーthat are undue and persistent. Indee...
The interaction between modality and negation in Turkish
The interaction between modality and negation in Turkish
Abstract This paper investigates the scope interaction between modality and negation in Turkish. We observe that modals display a complex picture of scope interacti...
Temas Epistêmicos, não Epistêmicos no Ensino
Temas Epistêmicos, não Epistêmicos no Ensino
Resumo A Epistemologia da Ciência é um campo de estudo que permite analisar o desenvolvimento da ciência em uma postura dialética, que qualifica as questões internas à Ciência, rel...
Epistemic Injustice
Epistemic Injustice
<p>“Epistemic injustice” is a fairly new concept in philosophy, which, loosely speaking, describes a kind of injustice that occurs at the intersection of structures of the so...
The Epistemic Innocence of Irrational Beliefs
The Epistemic Innocence of Irrational Beliefs
Abstract Ideally, we would have beliefs that satisfy norms of truth and rationality, as well as fostering the acquisition, retention and use of other relevant inform...
Stable acceptance for mighty knowledge
Stable acceptance for mighty knowledge
AbstractDrawing on the puzzling behavior of ordinary knowledge ascriptions that embed an epistemic (im)possibility claim, we tentatively conclude that it is untenable to jointly en...

Back to Top