Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Kinematics of side and cross circles on pommel horse

View through CrossRef
AbstractOne of the most fundamental skills on the pommel horse is double leg circles (circles). Circles can be performed on all parts of the pommel horse. It was hypothesized that the different sets of physical constraints of the apparatus require a gymnast to adapt circles technique. The purpose of this study was to quantify how gymnasts modify their technique during circles to accommodate different physical obstacles due to different support surfaces and body orientations. To investigate these adaptations, a comparison of the two most common circles on pommel horse – namely, circles in cross support (cross‐circles) and circles in side support (side‐circles) – was carried out. Seven elite male gymnasts performed three sets of 10 cross‐circles and side‐circles on a pommel horse. Three‐dimensional coordinates were acquired using 12 Qualisys ProReflex motion tracking cameras operating at 120 Hz. Temporal characteristics, the motion of the centre of mass, and the body angles – flexion and lateral flexion – were analysed. We found that cross‐circles took less time to complete a single circle (0.92±0.02 vs. 0.95±0.02 s), had a smaller ratio for the rear support phase (0.15±0.02 vs. 0.18±0.03), a narrower supporting‐hand distance (0.33±0.03 vs. 0.52±0.00 m), greater flexion of the body over the rear support phase (44±12° vs. 27±8°), and less lateral flexion of the body over the single‐hand support phase (entry: 20±5° vs. 35±3°; exit: 26±4° vs. 33±4°) than side‐circles. Our results suggest that gymnasts adapt their technique to the physical constraints imposed by the shape of the pommel horse and the location and orientation of the circles. Cross‐circles were characterized by a high rear support position with a narrower hand‐spacing, which would require excellent shoulder flexibility and strength. Consequently, lack of these traits may explain the need for greater body flexion in cross‐circles than in side‐circles during rear support. Understanding the technical differences will facilitate an effective transfer of the technical similarities among different types of circles.
Title: Kinematics of side and cross circles on pommel horse
Description:
AbstractOne of the most fundamental skills on the pommel horse is double leg circles (circles).
Circles can be performed on all parts of the pommel horse.
It was hypothesized that the different sets of physical constraints of the apparatus require a gymnast to adapt circles technique.
The purpose of this study was to quantify how gymnasts modify their technique during circles to accommodate different physical obstacles due to different support surfaces and body orientations.
To investigate these adaptations, a comparison of the two most common circles on pommel horse – namely, circles in cross support (cross‐circles) and circles in side support (side‐circles) – was carried out.
Seven elite male gymnasts performed three sets of 10 cross‐circles and side‐circles on a pommel horse.
Three‐dimensional coordinates were acquired using 12 Qualisys ProReflex motion tracking cameras operating at 120 Hz.
Temporal characteristics, the motion of the centre of mass, and the body angles – flexion and lateral flexion – were analysed.
We found that cross‐circles took less time to complete a single circle (0.
92±0.
02 vs.
0.
95±0.
02 s), had a smaller ratio for the rear support phase (0.
15±0.
02 vs.
0.
18±0.
03), a narrower supporting‐hand distance (0.
33±0.
03 vs.
0.
52±0.
00 m), greater flexion of the body over the rear support phase (44±12° vs.
27±8°), and less lateral flexion of the body over the single‐hand support phase (entry: 20±5° vs.
35±3°; exit: 26±4° vs.
33±4°) than side‐circles.
Our results suggest that gymnasts adapt their technique to the physical constraints imposed by the shape of the pommel horse and the location and orientation of the circles.
Cross‐circles were characterized by a high rear support position with a narrower hand‐spacing, which would require excellent shoulder flexibility and strength.
Consequently, lack of these traits may explain the need for greater body flexion in cross‐circles than in side‐circles during rear support.
Understanding the technical differences will facilitate an effective transfer of the technical similarities among different types of circles.

Related Results

The Effect of the Accuracy of Various Measuring Devices on Recorded Joint Kinematics
The Effect of the Accuracy of Various Measuring Devices on Recorded Joint Kinematics
Knowledge of joint kinematics contributes to the understanding of the function of soft tissue restraints, injury mechanisms, and can be used to evaluate surgical repair techniques....
Equestrian: Horse sport development and cooperation between horses and humans
Equestrian: Horse sport development and cooperation between horses and humans
One of the most important industries in China’s history has been the horse industry, and the modern horse industry is still in the process of being transformed. When the horse busi...
A Comparison of a Multi-body Model and 3D Kinematics and EMG of Double-leg Circle on Pommel Horse
A Comparison of a Multi-body Model and 3D Kinematics and EMG of Double-leg Circle on Pommel Horse
A Comparison of a Multi-body Model and 3D Kinematics and EMG of Double-leg Circle on Pommel Horse The purpose of this study was to establish a multi-segment dynamic ...
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PROFILE OF THE HORSE OWNERS AND THEIR KNOWLEDGE ABOUT SCIENTIFIC HORSE REARING PRACTICES
RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PROFILE OF THE HORSE OWNERS AND THEIR KNOWLEDGE ABOUT SCIENTIFIC HORSE REARING PRACTICES
The investigation has been carried out in all district of middle Gujarat which falls under jurisdiction of Anand Agricultural University. The study is focus on the socio-economic c...
Discovering optimal flapping wing kinematics using active deep learning
Discovering optimal flapping wing kinematics using active deep learning
This paper focuses on the discovery of optimal flapping wing kinematics using a deep learning surrogate model for unsteady aerodynamics and multi-objective optimisation. First, a s...
HEAD-TOE DISTANCE AS A SIMPLE MEASURE TO EVALUATE AMPLITUDE OF CIRCLES ON POMMEL HORSE
HEAD-TOE DISTANCE AS A SIMPLE MEASURE TO EVALUATE AMPLITUDE OF CIRCLES ON POMMEL HORSE
To develop scientifically-valid tools to monitor performance in practice, a critical question is what to measure. On pommel horse, the importance of fundamental skills called circl...

Back to Top