Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Prevention of Anastomotic Leak in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: The Role of Anastomotic Technique and Adjuvant Surgical Strategies
View through CrossRef
Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy is followed by a considerable anastomotic leakage rate, which is a potentially fatal complication, followed by increased morbidity and mortality. The emergence of minimally invasive surgery led to a wide variety of anastomotic techniques, three of which are mainly preferred. Hand-sewn anastomoses can be performed in an end-to-end or end-to-side manner, while stapled end-to-end or end-to-side anastomoses are conducted either as circular-stapled anastomoses using a transorally inserted anvil (Orvil™) or as hand-sewn purse-string stapled anastomoses. In addition, side-to-side esophagogastrostomy with a linear stapler is presented as a promising technique. Hybrid techniques are also reported. No consensus has been achieved upon optimal technique and the decision relies on surgeon preference and skills, cost, and length of the available conduit. Furthermore, numerous techniques have been proposed to prevent anastomotic leakage (AL), including appropriate submucosa apposition, omentoplasty of the anastomosis, wide gastric and duodenal mobilization, sufficient esophageal hiatus enlargement, gentle conduit manipulation, reinforcement of staple line, intraoperative fluorescence angiography, as well as preoperative ligation of the left gastric artery. This chapter aims to provide a critical appraisal of the various anastomotic techniques and the tips and tricks described for reducing the anastomotic leak rate during minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.
Title: Prevention of Anastomotic Leak in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: The Role of Anastomotic Technique and Adjuvant Surgical Strategies
Description:
Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy is followed by a considerable anastomotic leakage rate, which is a potentially fatal complication, followed by increased morbidity and mortality.
The emergence of minimally invasive surgery led to a wide variety of anastomotic techniques, three of which are mainly preferred.
Hand-sewn anastomoses can be performed in an end-to-end or end-to-side manner, while stapled end-to-end or end-to-side anastomoses are conducted either as circular-stapled anastomoses using a transorally inserted anvil (Orvil™) or as hand-sewn purse-string stapled anastomoses.
In addition, side-to-side esophagogastrostomy with a linear stapler is presented as a promising technique.
Hybrid techniques are also reported.
No consensus has been achieved upon optimal technique and the decision relies on surgeon preference and skills, cost, and length of the available conduit.
Furthermore, numerous techniques have been proposed to prevent anastomotic leakage (AL), including appropriate submucosa apposition, omentoplasty of the anastomosis, wide gastric and duodenal mobilization, sufficient esophageal hiatus enlargement, gentle conduit manipulation, reinforcement of staple line, intraoperative fluorescence angiography, as well as preoperative ligation of the left gastric artery.
This chapter aims to provide a critical appraisal of the various anastomotic techniques and the tips and tricks described for reducing the anastomotic leak rate during minimally invasive Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.
Related Results
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Hydatid Disease of The Brain Parenchyma: A Systematic Review
Abstarct
Introduction
Isolated brain hydatid disease (BHD) is an extremely rare form of echinococcosis. A prompt and timely diagnosis is a crucial step in disease management. This ...
Tổng quan về cắt thực quản hiện đại
Tổng quan về cắt thực quản hiện đại
Tóm tắt
Mục tiêu: Trình bày tổng quan về cắt thực quản thời hiện đại.
Năm 1913, Franz John Torek (1861-1938) người Đức làm việc tại bệnh viện Lenox Hill, Newyork City, là người ...
063. ROBOTIC ASSISTED MIMINALLY INVASIVE IVOR-LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL MINIMALLY INVASIVE IVOR-LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY
063. ROBOTIC ASSISTED MIMINALLY INVASIVE IVOR-LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY VERSUS CONVENTIONAL MINIMALLY INVASIVE IVOR-LEWIS ESOPHAGECTOMY
Abstract
Background
Minimally invasive technique for esophagectomy has emerged as the standard of care for resectable esophageal...
596. MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR ESOPHAGEAL AND GASTRO-ESOPHAGEAL JUNCTION TUMORS. A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE
596. MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR ESOPHAGEAL AND GASTRO-ESOPHAGEAL JUNCTION TUMORS. A SINGLE CENTER EXPERIENCE
Abstract
Esophagectomy carries high rates of post-operative morbidity and mortality. Minimally invasive esophagectomy was introduced more than 20 years ago offering ...
Non-Gastrointestinal Complications and Short-Term Outcomes in Patients With Anastomotic Leak After Colon Resection: A Propensity Matched Analysis of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database
Non-Gastrointestinal Complications and Short-Term Outcomes in Patients With Anastomotic Leak After Colon Resection: A Propensity Matched Analysis of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database
Introduction: Anastomotic leak is a devastating complication after colorectal surgery. There is paucity of data on non-gastrointestinal complications after anastomotic leak in this...
587. ROLE OF THORACOSCOPIC HAND-SEWN ESOPHAGO-GASTRIC ANASTOMOSIS IN 2-STAGE TOTALLY MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY. REPORT OF 200 CONSECUTIVE CASES
587. ROLE OF THORACOSCOPIC HAND-SEWN ESOPHAGO-GASTRIC ANASTOMOSIS IN 2-STAGE TOTALLY MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY. REPORT OF 200 CONSECUTIVE CASES
Abstract
Esophagectomy is the mainstay of treatment of esophageal and gastro-esophageal junction cancer. Minimally invasive esophagectomy has been introduced in the ...
Treatment of Intrathoracic Anastomotic Leak After Esophagectomy with the Sump Drainage Tube
Treatment of Intrathoracic Anastomotic Leak After Esophagectomy with the Sump Drainage Tube
Abstract
Background: Intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomotic leak is one of the deadliest complications after esophagectomy. In recent years, we have implemented new meth...
Prognostic factors influencing morbidity and mortality in esophageal carcinoma
Prognostic factors influencing morbidity and mortality in esophageal carcinoma
PURPOSE: In 1980, operative mortality for esophageal resection was 29%. Over the last 15 years, technical and critical care improvements contributed to the reduction of postoperati...

