Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Reporting and Reproducibility of Meta-Analysis in Speech, Language, and Hearing Research

View through CrossRef
Purpose The purposes of this meta-review are to (a) articulate the importance of transparency and reproducibility in meta-analysis, (b) assess the transparency and reproducibility of meta-analyses published in journals of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA), and (c) discuss the implications of our findings and recommendations for future research. Method We conducted a meta-review of all meta-analyses published in ASHA journals through December 31, 2020. Our systematic review yielded 47 meta-analyses for inclusion in this review. We coded all eligible reports on the core elements of transparency and reproducibility in meta-analysis. Results Our findings suggest that though reporting tendencies have improved over time, much work is needed to promote transparency and reproducibility in meta-analytic work. Key areas for future accountability include preregistering study protocol, using Preferred Reporting in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis checklists, providing full data sets, and publishing analytic codes. Conclusions The state of reporting in meta-analysis is improving over time. We conclude with a discussion of specific areas that need further attention, and recommendations for researchers to consider when conducting future meta-analyses. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.14888481
Title: Reporting and Reproducibility of Meta-Analysis in Speech, Language, and Hearing Research
Description:
Purpose The purposes of this meta-review are to (a) articulate the importance of transparency and reproducibility in meta-analysis, (b) assess the transparency and reproducibility of meta-analyses published in journals of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA), and (c) discuss the implications of our findings and recommendations for future research.
Method We conducted a meta-review of all meta-analyses published in ASHA journals through December 31, 2020.
Our systematic review yielded 47 meta-analyses for inclusion in this review.
We coded all eligible reports on the core elements of transparency and reproducibility in meta-analysis.
Results Our findings suggest that though reporting tendencies have improved over time, much work is needed to promote transparency and reproducibility in meta-analytic work.
Key areas for future accountability include preregistering study protocol, using Preferred Reporting in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis checklists, providing full data sets, and publishing analytic codes.
Conclusions The state of reporting in meta-analysis is improving over time.
We conclude with a discussion of specific areas that need further attention, and recommendations for researchers to consider when conducting future meta-analyses.
Supplemental Material https://doi.
org/10.
23641/asha.
14888481.

Related Results

Hubungan Perilaku Pola Makan dengan Kejadian Anak Obesitas
Hubungan Perilaku Pola Makan dengan Kejadian Anak Obesitas
<p><em><span style="font-size: 11.0pt; font-family: 'Times New Roman',serif; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-langua...
Introduction To Hearing And Speech Rehabilitation
Introduction To Hearing And Speech Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation of hearing and speech represents a theory that needs to be confirmed, and also the practice, also a process which is in continuous progress. It is simultaneously a s...
Pattern of hearing loss among patients visiting ENT OPD at Janaki Medical College: A cross sectional study
Pattern of hearing loss among patients visiting ENT OPD at Janaki Medical College: A cross sectional study
Background and Objectives: To study the pattern of hearing loss among patients visiting ENT OPD in Janaki medical college teaching hospital.Material and Methods: The study was cond...
Hearing Loss in Stroke Cases: A Literature Review
Hearing Loss in Stroke Cases: A Literature Review
Stroke is the most common cause of neurological disability (MacDonald, Cockerell, Sander, & Shorvon, 2000) and about 1 in 3 stroke life survivors are functionally reliant on it...
Non-compliance in Elderly Hearing-aid Users
Non-compliance in Elderly Hearing-aid Users
Objective (Background): Despite the scientific advancements, acceptance of hearing-aids remains poor in persons with hearing impairment in the elderly age group. The attitudinal is...

Back to Top