Search engine for discovering works of Art, research articles, and books related to Art and Culture
ShareThis
Javascript must be enabled to continue!

Multicenter randomized study on comparison between electronic and traditional chest drainage systems

View through CrossRef
Abstract Background In patients submitted to major pulmonary resection, post-operative length of stay is mainly influenced by duration of air leaks and chest tube removal. The measurement of air leaks largely relies on traditional chest drainage systems which are prone to subjective interpretation. Difficulty to differentiate between active air leaks and bubbles due to a pleural space effect may also lead to tentative drain clamping and prolonged time for chest drain removal. New digital systems allow continuous monitoring of air leaks, identifying subtle leakage that may be not visible during daily patient evaluation. Moreover, an objective assessment of air leaks may lead to a reduced interobserver variability and to an optimized timing of chest tube removal. Methods This study is a prospective randomized, interventional, multicenter trial designed to compare the electronic chest drainage system (Drentech™ Palm Evo) with the traditional system (Drentech™ Compact) in a cohort of patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy through a standard 3-ports VATS approach for benign or malignant disease. It will enroll 382 patients in 3 Italian centers. Duration of chest drainage and length of hospital stay will be evaluated in the two groups. Moreover, it will be evaluated if the use of a digital chest system compared with a traditional system reduces the interobserver variability. Finally, it will be evaluated the possible advantages of the digital drain system to distinguish an active air leak from a pleural space effect, by the evaluation of intrapleural differential pressure, and to identify potential predictors of prolonged air leaks. Discussion To date few studies have been performed to evaluate clinical impact of digital drainage systems. The proposed prospective randomized trial will provide new knowledge to this research area by investigating and comparing the difference between digital and traditional chest drain systems. In particular, the objectives of this project are to evaluate the feasibility and usefulness of utilizing the digital chest drain and to provide new tools to identify patients at higher risk of developing prolonged air leaks. Trial registration number NCT03536130, Registered 24 May 2018 - Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=&term=NCT03536130&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=
Title: Multicenter randomized study on comparison between electronic and traditional chest drainage systems
Description:
Abstract Background In patients submitted to major pulmonary resection, post-operative length of stay is mainly influenced by duration of air leaks and chest tube removal.
The measurement of air leaks largely relies on traditional chest drainage systems which are prone to subjective interpretation.
Difficulty to differentiate between active air leaks and bubbles due to a pleural space effect may also lead to tentative drain clamping and prolonged time for chest drain removal.
New digital systems allow continuous monitoring of air leaks, identifying subtle leakage that may be not visible during daily patient evaluation.
Moreover, an objective assessment of air leaks may lead to a reduced interobserver variability and to an optimized timing of chest tube removal.
Methods This study is a prospective randomized, interventional, multicenter trial designed to compare the electronic chest drainage system (Drentech™ Palm Evo) with the traditional system (Drentech™ Compact) in a cohort of patients undergoing pulmonary lobectomy through a standard 3-ports VATS approach for benign or malignant disease.
It will enroll 382 patients in 3 Italian centers.
Duration of chest drainage and length of hospital stay will be evaluated in the two groups.
Moreover, it will be evaluated if the use of a digital chest system compared with a traditional system reduces the interobserver variability.
Finally, it will be evaluated the possible advantages of the digital drain system to distinguish an active air leak from a pleural space effect, by the evaluation of intrapleural differential pressure, and to identify potential predictors of prolonged air leaks.
Discussion To date few studies have been performed to evaluate clinical impact of digital drainage systems.
The proposed prospective randomized trial will provide new knowledge to this research area by investigating and comparing the difference between digital and traditional chest drain systems.
In particular, the objectives of this project are to evaluate the feasibility and usefulness of utilizing the digital chest drain and to provide new tools to identify patients at higher risk of developing prolonged air leaks.
Trial registration number NCT03536130, Registered 24 May 2018 - Retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.
gov/ct2/results?cond=&term=NCT03536130&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=.

Related Results

Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction: Although traumatic chylothorax is predominantly associated with penetrating injuries, instances following blunt trauma, as a rare and challenging condition, ...
Chest Wall Hydatid Cysts: A Systematic Review
Chest Wall Hydatid Cysts: A Systematic Review
Abstract Introduction Given the rarity of chest wall hydatid disease, information on this condition is primarily drawn from case reports. Hence, this study systematically reviews t...
Multicenter randomized study on comparison between electronic and traditional chest drainage systems
Multicenter randomized study on comparison between electronic and traditional chest drainage systems
Abstract Background: In patients submitted to major pulmonary resection, post-operative length of stay is mainly influenced by duration of air leaks and chest tube removal....
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM)
This section provides current contact details and a summary of recent or ongoing clinical trials being coordinated by Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM). Clinical trials...
Procurement of Trash Bins and Drainage Maintenance in Anjatan Baru Village, Indramayu Regency
Procurement of Trash Bins and Drainage Maintenance in Anjatan Baru Village, Indramayu Regency
The work of each head of family in the Anjatan Baru Village community includes farming, entrepreneurship, livestock farming, civil servants, and others. Activities between resident...
Drainage reorganization disrupts scaling between drainage area and valley width
Drainage reorganization disrupts scaling between drainage area and valley width
Valley width is a fundamental morphologic property of rivers that plays a key role in drainage networks' hydrology, ecology, and geomorphology. In many cases, defining and measurin...
Safety and effectiveness of transient ascites drainage in hospitalized patients with large ascites
Safety and effectiveness of transient ascites drainage in hospitalized patients with large ascites
Objectives Single paracentesis is the standard treatment for large ascites. An alternative is the placement of a transient ascites drainage. This study aimed to evaluat...
Using multiple hydrological data sources to reduce uncertainty in soil drainage modeling
Using multiple hydrological data sources to reduce uncertainty in soil drainage modeling
<p>Soil drainage flux is crucial for determining agrochemical loading and groundwater recharge. Because soil drainage is difficult to measure, it is typically predict...

Back to Top