Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Using multiple hydrological data sources to reduce uncertainty in soil drainage modeling
View through CrossRef
<p>Soil drainage flux is crucial for determining agrochemical loading and groundwater recharge. Because soil drainage is difficult to measure, it is typically predicted using soil moisture models. However, different soil moisture models have been shown to produce different drainage values although they all respected the same soil measurements well, leading to a non-uniqueness problem. To address this issue, this study used groundwater level, stream flow, and tile drainage measurements along with soil moisture data to constraint soil drainage estimation through a coupled soil and groundwater modeling framework in the Cross River watershed in Prince Edward Island, Canada. A 1D Richards equation model, LEACHM, was developed to predict soil drainage and calibrated using soil moisture data. A 3D watershed-scale MODFLOW model was built and calibrated against groundwater level data. The two models were loosely coupled using the soil drainage predicted by LEACHM as recharge. Forward coupled LEACHM and MODFLOW simulations were performed until simulated daily soil moisture, groundwater level, baseflow, and tile drainage values simultaneously matched the 2011&#8211;2014 observed values within prescribed error ranges by fine tuning the hydraulic parameters in coupled models. The coupled models were then verified using 2015&#8211;2016 data. The resulting LEACHM simulations matched the soil moisture data with less than 15% error, and MODFLOW simulations matched the groundwater level and base flow data, except for a few short periods when LEACHM overestimated soil drainage under deep snow cover. Although the timing of simulated soil drainage corresponded with the occurrence of tile drainage, the simulated soil drainage was generally higher than the tile drainage, which is considered reasonable because tiles intercept only a portion of the overall soil drainage. This exercise demonstrates that the coupled modeling respected multiple hydrological data sources instead of soil moisture alone, and thus enhanced soil moisture estimation.</p>
Title: Using multiple hydrological data sources to reduce uncertainty in soil drainage modeling
Description:
<p>Soil drainage flux is crucial for determining agrochemical loading and groundwater recharge.
Because soil drainage is difficult to measure, it is typically predicted using soil moisture models.
However, different soil moisture models have been shown to produce different drainage values although they all respected the same soil measurements well, leading to a non-uniqueness problem.
To address this issue, this study used groundwater level, stream flow, and tile drainage measurements along with soil moisture data to constraint soil drainage estimation through a coupled soil and groundwater modeling framework in the Cross River watershed in Prince Edward Island, Canada.
A 1D Richards equation model, LEACHM, was developed to predict soil drainage and calibrated using soil moisture data.
A 3D watershed-scale MODFLOW model was built and calibrated against groundwater level data.
The two models were loosely coupled using the soil drainage predicted by LEACHM as recharge.
Forward coupled LEACHM and MODFLOW simulations were performed until simulated daily soil moisture, groundwater level, baseflow, and tile drainage values simultaneously matched the 2011&#8211;2014 observed values within prescribed error ranges by fine tuning the hydraulic parameters in coupled models.
The coupled models were then verified using 2015&#8211;2016 data.
The resulting LEACHM simulations matched the soil moisture data with less than 15% error, and MODFLOW simulations matched the groundwater level and base flow data, except for a few short periods when LEACHM overestimated soil drainage under deep snow cover.
Although the timing of simulated soil drainage corresponded with the occurrence of tile drainage, the simulated soil drainage was generally higher than the tile drainage, which is considered reasonable because tiles intercept only a portion of the overall soil drainage.
This exercise demonstrates that the coupled modeling respected multiple hydrological data sources instead of soil moisture alone, and thus enhanced soil moisture estimation.
</p>.
Related Results
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Blunt Chest Trauma and Chylothorax: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Introduction: Although traumatic chylothorax is predominantly associated with penetrating injuries, instances following blunt trauma, as a rare and challenging condition, ...
Constraining simulation uncertainties in a hydrological model of the Congo River Basin including a combined modelling approach for channel-wetland exchanges
Constraining simulation uncertainties in a hydrological model of the Congo River Basin including a combined modelling approach for channel-wetland exchanges
Compared to other large river basins of the world, such as the Amazon, the Congo River Basin appears to be the most ungauged and less studied. This is partly because the basin lack...
Ecological soil physics as section of ecological soil science
Ecological soil physics as section of ecological soil science
Nowadays, there is a general penetration of ecology in other related sciences. Soil science is not an exception. To the evidence of this, the works of soil scientists may serve, th...
New Perspectives for 3D Visualization of Dynamic Reservoir Uncertainty
New Perspectives for 3D Visualization of Dynamic Reservoir Uncertainty
This reference is for an abstract only. A full paper was not submitted for this conference.
Abstract
1 Int...
Reserves Uncertainty Calculation Accounting for Parameter Uncertainty
Reserves Uncertainty Calculation Accounting for Parameter Uncertainty
Abstract
An important goal of geostatistical modeling is to assess output uncertainty after processing realizations through a transfer function, in particular, to...
Evaluation of digital maps of top-soil properties compared to large-scale laboratory soil data and synergies towards a better European soils’ delineation. 
Evaluation of digital maps of top-soil properties compared to large-scale laboratory soil data and synergies towards a better European soils’ delineation. 
Soil maps describe spatial variability by using traditional or predictive soil mapping techniques. Conventional soil maps group soils based on their similar cartographic properties...
The uncertainty–investment relationship: scrutinizing the role of firm size
The uncertainty–investment relationship: scrutinizing the role of firm size
PurposeThe objective of this paper is threefold. First, it aims to empirically study whether firm-specific/idiosyncratic uncertainty, macroeconomic/aggregate uncertainty and politi...
Hydrology models DRAINMOD and SWIM applied to large soil lysimeters with artificial drainage
Hydrology models DRAINMOD and SWIM applied to large soil lysimeters with artificial drainage
Two hydrological models, which used different methods to determine the soil
water distribution in a soil profile, were evaluated against 4 years of data
from large soil lysimeters....

