Javascript must be enabled to continue!
Stool-based Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in children at a teaching and referral hospital in Southwest Ethiopia
View through CrossRef
Background
Diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) in children is challenging mainly due to the difficulty of obtaining respiratory specimen and lack of sensitive diagnostic tests. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert here after) for the diagnosis of pulmonary TB (PTB) from stool specimen in children.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted among consecutively recruited children (less than 15 years old) with presumptive PTB at Jimma Medical Center, Ethiopia. One pulmonary specimen (expectorated sputum or gastric aspirate) was collected from each participant and tested for TB by Xpert and Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) culture. In addition, one stool specimen per child was collected and tested by Xpert after a single step, centrifuge-free stool processing method adapted from KNCV TB Foundation. Diagnostic performance of Xpert was calculated with reference to LJ culture and to a composite reference standards (CRS) comprising of confirmed TB (positive by Xpert and/or culture) and unconfirmed TB (clinical diagnosis with improvement after anti-TB treatment).
Results
A total of 178 children were enrolled; 152 of whom had complete microbiological results. Overall, TB was diagnosed in 13.2% (20/152) of the children with presumptive TB. Of these, only ten had microbiologically confirmed TB (positive Xpert and/or culture) and the remaining ten were clinically diagnosed with positive response to anti-TB treatment and were classified as unconfirmed TB. Stool Xpert had sensitivity of 100% (95%CI: 66.4–100) and specificity of 99.3% (95%CI: 96.2–100) compared to culture; however, the sensitivity was decreased to 50% (95%CI: 27.2–72.8) when compared to CRS. The Xpert on gastric aspirate had sensitivity of 77.8% (95%CI: 40–97.2) compared to culture and 40% (95%CI: 19.1–64) compared to CRS.
Conclusions
The sensitivity of Xpert for stool sample is comparable to that for gastric aspirate. Stool sample is a potential alternative to pulmonary specimen in the diagnosis of pulmonary TB in children using Xpert.
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Title: Stool-based Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in children at a teaching and referral hospital in Southwest Ethiopia
Description:
Background
Diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) in children is challenging mainly due to the difficulty of obtaining respiratory specimen and lack of sensitive diagnostic tests.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert here after) for the diagnosis of pulmonary TB (PTB) from stool specimen in children.
Methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted among consecutively recruited children (less than 15 years old) with presumptive PTB at Jimma Medical Center, Ethiopia.
One pulmonary specimen (expectorated sputum or gastric aspirate) was collected from each participant and tested for TB by Xpert and Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) culture.
In addition, one stool specimen per child was collected and tested by Xpert after a single step, centrifuge-free stool processing method adapted from KNCV TB Foundation.
Diagnostic performance of Xpert was calculated with reference to LJ culture and to a composite reference standards (CRS) comprising of confirmed TB (positive by Xpert and/or culture) and unconfirmed TB (clinical diagnosis with improvement after anti-TB treatment).
Results
A total of 178 children were enrolled; 152 of whom had complete microbiological results.
Overall, TB was diagnosed in 13.
2% (20/152) of the children with presumptive TB.
Of these, only ten had microbiologically confirmed TB (positive Xpert and/or culture) and the remaining ten were clinically diagnosed with positive response to anti-TB treatment and were classified as unconfirmed TB.
Stool Xpert had sensitivity of 100% (95%CI: 66.
4–100) and specificity of 99.
3% (95%CI: 96.
2–100) compared to culture; however, the sensitivity was decreased to 50% (95%CI: 27.
2–72.
8) when compared to CRS.
The Xpert on gastric aspirate had sensitivity of 77.
8% (95%CI: 40–97.
2) compared to culture and 40% (95%CI: 19.
1–64) compared to CRS.
Conclusions
The sensitivity of Xpert for stool sample is comparable to that for gastric aspirate.
Stool sample is a potential alternative to pulmonary specimen in the diagnosis of pulmonary TB in children using Xpert.
Related Results
The Value of Lateral Flow Urine Lipoarabinomannan Assay and Empirical Treatment in the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra Era: a Prospective Cohort Study
The Value of Lateral Flow Urine Lipoarabinomannan Assay and Empirical Treatment in the Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra Era: a Prospective Cohort Study
Abstract
Introduction: The value of Lateral Flow urine Lipoarabinomannan (LF-LAM) assay and the role of empiric tuberculosis (TB) treatment in the era of the highly sensiti...
The value of lateral flow urine lipoarabinomannan assay and empirical treatment in Xpert MTB/RIF ultra negative patients with presumptive TB: a prospective cohort study
The value of lateral flow urine lipoarabinomannan assay and empirical treatment in Xpert MTB/RIF ultra negative patients with presumptive TB: a prospective cohort study
AbstractThe value of Lateral Flow urine Lipoarabinomannan (LF-LAM) assay and the role of empiric tuberculosis (TB) treatment in the era of the highly sensitive Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra ...
Quality assurance practices in tuberculosis diagnostic health facilities in Ethiopia
Quality assurance practices in tuberculosis diagnostic health facilities in Ethiopia
Introduction
The quality of tuberculosis laboratory services in health facilities is a mandatory component of detecting active pulmonary TB cases and treatment follow-up. However, ...
Clinical spectrum of admitted patients undergoing Xpert MTB/RIF® testing for tuberculosis evaluation at a tertiary care hospital
Clinical spectrum of admitted patients undergoing Xpert MTB/RIF® testing for tuberculosis evaluation at a tertiary care hospital
Abstract
Background:
The introduction of Xpert MTB/RIF® has revolutionised the diagnosis of tuberculosis (TB) by reducing time to the identificat...
Rapid detection of non-rifampicin drug resistant tuberculosis using Xpert MTB/XDR testing: Findings from a multisite drug-resistant tuberculosis case detection surge in Zambia
Rapid detection of non-rifampicin drug resistant tuberculosis using Xpert MTB/XDR testing: Findings from a multisite drug-resistant tuberculosis case detection surge in Zambia
Abstract
Background
Zambia continues to face a high burden of tuberculosis with rising drug resistance, yet diagnosis of non-ri...
Reflex Xpert MTB/XDR Testing of Residual Rifampicin-Resistant Specimens: A Clinical Laboratory-Based Diagnostic Accuracy and Feasibility Study in South Africa
Reflex Xpert MTB/XDR Testing of Residual Rifampicin-Resistant Specimens: A Clinical Laboratory-Based Diagnostic Accuracy and Feasibility Study in South Africa
Abstract
Background
The World Health Organization–approved Xpert MTB/XDR test detects Mycobacterium tuberculosis and resistance ...
The role of chest radiography in the diagnosis of bacteriologically confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis in hospitalised Xpert MTB/RIF-negative patients
The role of chest radiography in the diagnosis of bacteriologically confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis in hospitalised Xpert MTB/RIF-negative patients
The role of chest radiography to diagnose active tuberculosis in symptomatic patients who have a negative Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert) test result is unclear. This study aimed to assess t...
Evaluation of different methods in diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis infection
Evaluation of different methods in diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis infection
Abstract
Background and purposes:Tuberculosis (TB) is the most lethal infectious disease worldwide. About 24.6% of tuberculosis cases are extrapulmonary TB which commonly a...

